← Regulations / Armenia / Operating Models / Self-custodial wallet

Self-custodial wallet / non-custodial software in Armenia

Publisher of software where users hold their own private keys. The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Self-custodial wallet is conditionally permitted in Armenia without local incorporation, subject to AML obligations and none licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
No
Licensing burden
None
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • No AML obligations attach to a pure non-custodial software publisher — such an entity never holds, controls, or has access to user funds or private keys, and therefore does not qualify as a VASP under the Armenian AML/CFT Law (am.licensing.anti-money-laundering-and-counter-terrorist-financing).
  • If the publisher were deemed a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) — which the facts indicate is unlikely for a self-custodial wallet — AML obligations would include: customer identification and verification (am.aml.identification-and-verification-of-identity), beneficial ownership identification (am.aml.beneficial-ownership-identify-and-take), suspicious transaction reporting to the Financial Monitoring Center (am.aml.reporting-obligation-if-a-vasp), record-keeping for a minimum of 5 years (am.aml.period-records-related-to-customer), and sanctions screening (am.aml.sanctions-screening-screen-customers-and).
  • The 2022 amendments to the AML/CFT Law brought VASPs within scope of obligated entities (am.aml.specifics-this-law-originally-adopted), but a non-custodial wallet publisher is not a VASP under FATF standards or Armenian law, since it never engages in virtual-asset transfer, exchange, or custody on behalf of users.
  • FATF guidance (Recommendation 15) clarifies that software publishers of non-custodial wallets are generally not VASPs, and Armenia aligns with FATF recommendations (am.aml.impact-these-amendments-align-armenia).

Key Restrictions

  • The publisher must not hold, control, or have access to users' private keys or funds — any deviation from pure non-custodial architecture risks reclassification as a VASP (am.custody.no-specific-crypto-custody-license).
  • No dedicated crypto-asset licensing framework exists for non-custodial software; there is no license to apply for (am.licensing.lack-of-specific-legislation-there, am.custody.no-specific-crypto-custody-license).
  • If the software includes any fiat on-ramp/off-ramp or payment processing that touches Armenian dram (AMD), the publisher may inadvertently trigger the Law on Payment and Settlement Systems and require a payment organization license (am.licensing.payment-system-regulations-if-a).
  • The May 2025 Law on Crypto-Assets appears to regulate licensed crypto-asset service providers (including custodians) but does not appear to extend to pure non-custodial software publishers (am.custody.no-specific-regulations-there-are).

Key Risks

  • Criminal enforcement risk: Armenia has active criminal enforcement against crypto fraud schemes under Articles 188 and 190 of the RA Criminal Code (am.licensing.note-this-article-details-the). While enforcement targets fraudulent investment schemes, a self-custodial wallet publisher operating in a legal grey area could face investigative scrutiny.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: The Central Bank of Armenia maintains a cautious stance and has not issued clear guidance on non-custodial software (am.licensing.central-banks-stance-the-central). Operators face uncertainty about whether future rulemaking could retroactively classify wallet software as a regulated service.
  • Travel Rule exposure: If the publisher integrates transaction broadcasting or other ancillary services (e.g., IPFS gateways, custom RPC endpoints), it may inadvertently cross into VASP territory, triggering AML Travel Rule obligations under FATF-aligned Armenian law.
  • Seizure risk: Armenian authorities have a demonstrated willingness to freeze and seize crypto-related assets in ongoing criminal investigations, including multi-million-dollar seizures (am.licensing.examples-of-seized-assets-reports).

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 90% confidence

Lack of Specific Legislation: There is no dedicated law in Armenia regulating virtual assets or stipulating licensing requirements for crypto businesses. This creates a significant degree of legal uncertainty for operators.

licensing 90% confidence

Central Bank's Stance: The Central Bank of Armenia (CBA) has consistently maintained a cautious and conservative stance on cryptocurrencies. It has issued warnings to the public about the high risks associated with virtual assets, emphasizing that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Armenia and are not regulated or supervised by the CBA. They do not recognize cryptocurrencies as a form of electronic money, payment instrument, or security.

licensing 80% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) Law: This is the most significant piece of legislation relevant to virtual asset activities. Armenia, as a member of international bodies, adheres to FATF recommendations. The Law on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (Հայաստանի Հանրապետության օրենքը «Փողերի լվացման և ահաբեկչության ֆինանսավորման դեմ պայքարի մասին») likely applies to entities dealing with virtual assets, even if not explicitly named as "VASPs" in the law. This means any entity facilitating the transfer, exchange, or custody of virtual assets would be expected to implement robust AML/KYC procedures.

aml 40% confidence

Specifics: This law, originally adopted in 2004, has undergone several amendments. Crucially, amendments in 2022 specifically brought virtual asset service providers (VASPs) within the scope of obligated entities. This means VASPs are now subject to the same AML/CFT obligations as traditional financial institutions.

aml 85% confidence

These amendments align Armenia with FATF Recommendation 15 on new technologies, which requires countries to regulate and supervise VASPs for AML/CFT purposes. The Travel Rule application to VASPs has been clarified as distinct from the core Recommendation 15 VASP regulatory requirements.

aml 90% confidence

Identification and Verification of Identity:

aml 95% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer, especially for legal entities and complex structures. This includes understanding the ownership and control structure.

aml 95% confidence

Reporting Obligation: If a VASP knows, suspects, or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds, virtual assets, or other assets are the proceeds of a criminal activity, or are related to terrorist financing, it must immediately file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) with the Financial Monitoring Center (FMC) of the CBA.

aml 90% confidence

Period: Records related to customer identification data, beneficial ownership information, transaction data (including virtual asset addresses, transaction hashes, amounts, and timestamps), and any STRs filed must be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after the date of the transaction.

aml 90% confidence

Sanctions Screening: Screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists.

custody 60% confidence

No specific "crypto custody license" exists. Armenia does not currently have a dedicated licensing regime for cryptocurrency custodians.

custody 90% confidence

Armenia has specific laws and regulations, including the Law on Crypto-Assets (adopted May 29, 2025), that regulate crypto-asset service providers (including custodians) licensed by the Central Bank, with requirements for AML, transaction monitoring, record retention, and client protections, though explicit client asset segregation mandates are not detailed in the provided evidence.

licensing 85% confidence

Payment System Regulations: If a crypto-related service involves the processing of fiat currency (e.g., converting AMD to crypto or vice versa), it may inadvertently trigger requirements under the Law on Payment and Settlement Systems and Payment Organizations, potentially requiring a license for a payment organization or payment system operator from the CBA.

Evidence fact am.licensing.exchanges-crypto-to-crypto-generally-unregulated-operators-function not found (may have been renamed).

licensing 85% confidence

A criminal case under Articles 188 and 190 of the RA Criminal Code related to a crypto company was initiated, but the subsequent Armenian Court of Appeal ruling declaring the detention of businessman Samvel Karapetyan illegal indicates that the legal basis or enforcement of such detentions is not consistently upheld, undermining the characterization of a sustained proactive approach.

licensing 85% confidence

Examples of Seized Assets: Reports mention seizures of large sums in fiat currency, cryptocurrency, real estate, and luxury vehicles. For instance, some cases involved alleged damages amounting to tens or hundreds of millions of USD.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a pure non-custodial wallet publisher (no control over user keys or funds) is not classified as a VASP under Armenian law and faces no licensing or AML obligations, but operates in a legal grey area with criminal enforcement risk, no clear regulatory guidance from the Central Bank, and potential exposure if ancillary services touch fiat or transaction broadcasting.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • Does software publishing trigger VASP / MSB classification?
  • Do AML obligations attach when no custody exists?
  • What disclosure or consumer-protection rules apply?