Crypto ATM / kiosk operator in Bangladesh
Physical kiosks that exchange cash for crypto (and sometimes vice versa). High-cash AML risk profile.
Crypto ATM is not permitted in Bangladesh.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- no
- Local entity required
- No
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- No specific AML/CFT licensing or registration framework exists for virtual assets — none is available to comply with.
- Bangladesh Bank has declared all cryptocurrency transactions illegal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 and Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012
- Engaging in crypto transactions exposes operators to criminal prosecution for money laundering (4–12 years imprisonment under MLPA Section 4) and asset forfeiture
- Financial institutions are instructed by Bangladesh Bank to block all crypto-related transactions
- Law enforcement (CID, RAB) actively investigates and arrests individuals for crypto-related activities including fraud, illegal remittance (hundi), and MLM schemes
Key Restrictions
- Outright prohibition — no licensing or registration regime exists for virtual assets; all crypto activities are banned
- FE Circular No. 15 of 2017 and Circular No. 34 of 2021 explicitly prohibit dealing in, transacting, or exchanging virtual assets/cryptocurrencies
- Bangladesh Bank has directed all banks and financial institutions to block any crypto-related transactions
- No legal pathway exists to operate a crypto ATM/kiosk in Bangladesh
Key Risks
- Criminal prosecution risk — operators face charges under the Money Laundering Prevention Act (4–12 years imprisonment) and Foreign Exchange Regulation Act
- Asset forfeiture risk — authorities can seize assets linked to crypto activity
- Enforcement precedent exists — multiple arrests of individuals for crypto-based MLM, digital hundi, and exchange operations
- Bangladesh is on the FATF grey list, increasing regulatory pressure and enforcement against financial crimes
- No regulatory sandbox or temporary relief mechanism exists
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
In Bangladesh, cross‑border foreign exchange transactions are governed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (as amended), which remains in force and is administered by Bangladesh Bank. Bangladesh Bank has stated via circulars that cryptocurrencies/virtual currencies are not legal tender in Bangladesh and has warned against their use, but there is no explicit, publicly available provision in the Act itself or authoritative judicial ruling that categorically deems every cryptocurrency transaction—especially solely by virtue of being a “currency”—to be a violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. Rather, potential violations would arise where such transactions fall within regulated foreign exchange or cross‑border payment activities without required Bangladesh Bank permission.
Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012 (MLPA): The BB has highlighted the significant risks of money laundering and terrorist financing associated with the anonymity and unregulated nature of cryptocurrencies. While not specifically mentioning "virtual assets," engaging in transactions that facilitate money laundering through any means would fall under this act.
FE Circular No. 15 of 2017 (December 24, 2017): This was one of the earliest and most direct prohibitions. The BB warned against dealing in virtual currencies like Bitcoin, stating they are not legal tender, are not approved by the BB, and carrying out transactions with them could lead to violations of FERA and MLPA.
Circular No. 34 (of 2021) on Foreign Exchange Transactions (October 14, 2021): This circular reiterated the ban, explicitly stating that "virtual assets" (including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin) are not legal tender and are not permitted for transaction or exchange within Bangladesh. It also warned about associated risks and legal consequences.
Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Operating an exchange for buying, selling, or trading cryptocurrencies is prohibited.
Custody Providers: Providing custody services for virtual assets is not permitted.
Payment Processors: Engaging in payment processing or facilitating transactions involving cryptocurrencies is prohibited.
Neither a registration nor a licensing regime exists for virtual assets in Bangladesh.
The current approach is one of outright prohibition and warning against engaging in any activities related to cryptocurrencies.
There is no application process for virtual asset licenses in Bangladesh because such licenses are not issued.
Warnings to Financial Institutions: Bangladesh Bank has repeatedly issued warnings to all banks and financial institutions against dealing in, facilitating, or promoting cryptocurrencies. These warnings serve as an instruction to financial institutions to block transactions related to crypto.
Under Bangladesh’s Money Laundering Prevention Act (MLPA), Section 4, individuals convicted of money laundering are subject to a statutory imprisonment range of 4 to 12 years, with the precise term within that range determined by the court based on the nature, severity, and value of the offense.
Asset forfeiture is a legal process in which authorities confiscate property connected to alleged criminal activity, including assets used in, derived from, or otherwise linked to crime, sometimes through in rem proceedings that do not require a criminal conviction and can extend beyond only the assets directly involved in specific illegal transactions.
Regulator Name: Bangladesh Bank (BB)
Violation Type: Engaging in cryptocurrency transactions, which is considered illegal under existing foreign exchange regulations (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947) and anti-money laundering laws (Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012). BB states crypto carries high risks of money laundering, terror financing, and capital flight.
Criminal investigations into cryptocurrency-related fraud and illegal remittance schemes are active in Bangladesh, but there is insufficient recent evidence to confirm significant arrests of individuals involved.
Entity Targeted: General public, financial institutions, and implicitly, anyone involved in cryptocurrency. Violation Type: Engaging in cryptocurrency transactions, which is considered illegal under existing foreign exchange regulations (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947) and anti-money laundering laws (Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012). BB states crypto carries high risks of money laundering, terror financing, and capital flight. Penalty Amount: N/A (for a warning), but the underlying laws carry severe penalties (fines, imprisonment, asset forfeiture) for non-compliance. Outcome: Public awareness campaigns, continued illegal status of crypto, discouragement of financial institutions from dealing with crypto. This forms the basis for criminal prosecutions.
Public awareness campaigns exist in Bangladesh, but the illegal status of cryptocurrencies is evolving toward regulatory consideration, reducing outright discouragement of financial institutions and altering the prosecutorial landscape.
Outcome: Arrests, ongoing investigations, disruption of illegal schemes, seizure of assets.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Not permitted — Bangladesh imposes an outright prohibition on all cryptocurrency-related activities including ATM/kiosk operations, with no licensing or registration mechanism available, and criminal enforcement (including imprisonment of 4–12 years) applies under the Money Laundering Prevention Act and Foreign Exchange Regulation Act.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What money-transmitter / kiosk-specific license is required?
- What cash-transaction reporting thresholds apply?
- What enhanced-KYC obligations attach to cash-in / cash-out?