On-shore VASP in Bangladesh
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is not permitted in Bangladesh.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- no
- Local entity required
- No
- Licensing burden
- None
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Engaging in cryptocurrency transactions is illegal under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, and the Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012 (MLPA).
- Bangladesh Bank has issued multiple circulars (e.g., FE Circular No. 15 of 2017, Circular No. 34 of 2021) stating that virtual assets are not legal tender and prohibited for transaction or exchange.
- Bangladesh has committed to implementing robust AML/KYC procedures in line with FATF recommendations for VASPs but remains on the FATF grey list; however, no VASP licensing regime exists.
- Money Laundering Prevention Act (MLPA), Section 4 provides imprisonment of 4–12 years and asset forfeiture for money laundering offenses connected to crypto activities.
- There is no registration or licensing regime for VASPs — the current approach is outright prohibition.
Key Restrictions
- Operating a cryptocurrency exchange is prohibited.
- Providing custody services for virtual assets is prohibited.
- Engaging in payment processing or facilitating crypto transactions is prohibited.
- Bangladesh Bank has issued warnings to all banks and financial institutions against dealing in, facilitating, or promoting cryptocurrencies — effectively blocking the banking infrastructure needed to operate.
- No application process exists for virtual asset licenses because such licenses are not issued.
- The FATF Travel Rule has not been adopted because the underlying activity itself is illegal.
Key Risks
- Criminal prosecution risk: individuals and operators face arrest, imprisonment (4–12 years under MLPA), and asset forfeiture for crypto-related activities.
- Active enforcement: law enforcement (CID, RAB, Bangladesh Police) has made arrests for crypto-based MLM schemes, digital hundi, and illegal exchanges.
- No legal pathway exists to comply — operating as a VASP is categorically prohibited, not merely unlicensed.
- Tax treatment is adverse: any crypto-derived income would be treated as undeclared income from an illegal source, subject to highest marginal rates and penalties.
- Bangladesh is on the FATF grey list — ongoing strategic AML/CFT deficiencies create additional regulatory uncertainty.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
In Bangladesh, cross‑border foreign exchange transactions are governed by the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947 (as amended), which remains in force and is administered by Bangladesh Bank. Bangladesh Bank has stated via circulars that cryptocurrencies/virtual currencies are not legal tender in Bangladesh and has warned against their use, but there is no explicit, publicly available provision in the Act itself or authoritative judicial ruling that categorically deems every cryptocurrency transaction—especially solely by virtue of being a “currency”—to be a violation of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947. Rather, potential violations would arise where such transactions fall within regulated foreign exchange or cross‑border payment activities without required Bangladesh Bank permission.
Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012 (MLPA): The BB has highlighted the significant risks of money laundering and terrorist financing associated with the anonymity and unregulated nature of cryptocurrencies. While not specifically mentioning "virtual assets," engaging in transactions that facilitate money laundering through any means would fall under this act.
FE Circular No. 15 of 2017 (December 24, 2017): This was one of the earliest and most direct prohibitions. The BB warned against dealing in virtual currencies like Bitcoin, stating they are not legal tender, are not approved by the BB, and carrying out transactions with them could lead to violations of FERA and MLPA.
Circular No. 34 (of 2021) on Foreign Exchange Transactions (October 14, 2021): This circular reiterated the ban, explicitly stating that "virtual assets" (including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Litecoin) are not legal tender and are not permitted for transaction or exchange within Bangladesh. It also warned about associated risks and legal consequences.
Cryptocurrency Exchanges: Operating an exchange for buying, selling, or trading cryptocurrencies is prohibited.
Custody Providers: Providing custody services for virtual assets is not permitted.
Payment Processors: Engaging in payment processing or facilitating transactions involving cryptocurrencies is prohibited.
Neither a registration nor a licensing regime exists for virtual assets in Bangladesh.
The current approach is one of outright prohibition and warning against engaging in any activities related to cryptocurrencies.
There is no application process for virtual asset licenses in Bangladesh because such licenses are not issued.
Warnings to Financial Institutions: Bangladesh Bank has repeatedly issued warnings to all banks and financial institutions against dealing in, facilitating, or promoting cryptocurrencies. These warnings serve as an instruction to financial institutions to block transactions related to crypto.
Bangladesh has committed to implementing robust AML/KYC procedures in line with FATF recommendations for VASPs, but remains on the FATF grey list due to ongoing strategic AML/CFT deficiencies.
Under Bangladesh’s Money Laundering Prevention Act (MLPA), Section 4, individuals convicted of money laundering are subject to a statutory imprisonment range of 4 to 12 years, with the precise term within that range determined by the court based on the nature, severity, and value of the offense.
Regulator Name: Bangladesh Bank (BB)
Violation Type: Engaging in cryptocurrency transactions, which is considered illegal under existing foreign exchange regulations (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947) and anti-money laundering laws (Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012). BB states crypto carries high risks of money laundering, terror financing, and capital flight.
No, the FATF Travel Rule has not been adopted in Bangladesh. This is because the underlying activity of dealing in virtual assets itself is considered illegal and unauthorized by the central bank and the government.
N/A. Since the Travel Rule has not been adopted, there is no effective date.
FATF Mutual Evaluation Report (MER) for Bangladesh:
Entity Targeted: General public, financial institutions, and implicitly, anyone involved in cryptocurrency. Violation Type: Engaging in cryptocurrency transactions, which is considered illegal under existing foreign exchange regulations (Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947) and anti-money laundering laws (Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012). BB states crypto carries high risks of money laundering, terror financing, and capital flight. Penalty Amount: N/A (for a warning), but the underlying laws carry severe penalties (fines, imprisonment, asset forfeiture) for non-compliance. Outcome: Public awareness campaigns, continued illegal status of crypto, discouragement of financial institutions from dealing with crypto. This forms the basis for criminal prosecutions.
Entity Targeted: Individuals running illegal multi-level marketing (MLM) schemes using crypto, conducting "digital hundi" (informal remittance) via crypto, or engaging in crypto-related scams. Violation Type: Fraud, money laundering, operating illegal financial schemes, breach of Digital Security Act. Penalty Amount: Varies upon conviction (fines and imprisonment). Asset seizures occur during arrest. Specific penalty amounts are not publicly available at the time of arrest or often even immediately after conviction. Outcome: Arrests, ongoing investigations, disruption of illegal schemes, seizure of assets. Violation Type: Money laundering, violation of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, illegal hundi operations. Penalty Amount: Varies upon conviction. Outcome: Arrests, disruption of illegal remittance networks.
Outcome: Arrests, ongoing investigations, disruption of illegal schemes, seizure of assets.
No Specific Rates for Crypto: There are no specific capital gains tax rates for cryptocurrency in Bangladesh because it is not recognized as a legal asset for investment.
Hypothetical (Illegal Context): If an individual were to somehow declare "gains" from crypto, the NBR would not treat it as capital gains from a recognized asset. It would likely be treated as undeclared income from an illegal source, subject to general income tax laws at the highest marginal rates, along with penalties, and potentially triggering actions under other laws (e.g., anti-money laundering).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
No — On-shore VASP operation is not permitted in Bangladesh; all virtual asset activities (exchange, custody, payment processing) are categorically prohibited under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, and Money Laundering Prevention Act, 2012, with no licensing or registration regime available, and active criminal enforcement against participants.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?