← Regulations / Belgium / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Belgium

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Belgium with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with FSMA as a VASP (AML/CFT registration — not a full prudential license).
  • Apply AML/CFT controls per the Law of 18 September 2017 (as amended, including transposition of 5AMLD).
  • Conduct customer due diligence (CDD) on all clients.
  • Appoint a money laundering reporting officer and maintain internal AML/CFT procedures.
  • Report suspicious transactions to the Belgian Financial Intelligence Processing Unit (CTIF-CFI).
  • Comply with the EU Travel Rule (Regulation (EU) 2023/1113) effective 30 December 2024: collect and transmit originator and beneficiary information for all crypto-asset transfers; full identity data required for transfers ≥€1,000; no de minimis threshold for CASP-to-CASP transfers.
  • Maintain records and establish accounts segregating client crypto-assets from own assets (MiCA Article 67(2) requirements).
  • Comply with EU Transfer of Funds Regulation (2023/1113) with penalties under the Law of 18 September 2017 enforced by FSMA.

Key Restrictions

  • Must be incorporated locally and registered with the FSMA before offering services.
  • Services limited to exchange between virtual and fiat currencies and/or custodian wallet services under current regime (pre-MiCA). Broader activities permitted post-MiCA under CASP authorization.
  • Under current regime, FSMA registration is AML/CTF-focused and does not constitute full prudential licensing; a more comprehensive CASP authorization will be required under MiCA (Titles III & IV from 30 June 2024; other provisions from 30 December 2024).
  • No explicit segregation rules for crypto under current AML law, but MiCA Article 67(2) will mandate client asset segregation for safekeeping service providers.
  • No explicit national mandates for insurance/bonding or cold storage percentages under current framework, though prudent risk management expected.

Key Risks

  • Transition risk: Belgium is moving from a national AML registration regime (FSMA registration) to full MiCA CASP authorization. Operators must navigate both regimes and re-authorize under MiCA.
  • Regulatory ambiguity in current regime: the FSMA's assessment process for registration involves review of governance, shareholders, and AML policies but lacks detailed published criteria.
  • No explicit crypto-specific custody rules (segregation, insurance, cold storage) under current AML Law — legal certainty will only arrive with MiCA.
  • Tax complexity for incorporated entities: corporate income tax at 25% (standard); speculative gains on crypto by individuals taxed at 33% as miscellaneous income; professional activity taxed at progressive rates up to 50%+.
  • Enforcement risk: FSMA can impose substantial administrative sanctions, including fines, public reprimands, and withdrawal of registration; criminal penalties for serious/repeated AML breaches.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 20% confidence

Required: Registration with the FSMA.

licensing 20% confidence

Scope: This includes services for the exchange between virtual currencies and fiat currencies, as well as exchange services between one or more virtual currencies.

licensing 20% confidence

Scope: This covers services that provide the safekeeping and management of virtual currencies on behalf of clients, including holding private cryptographic keys.

licensing 20% confidence

Current Regime (Belgium): It is a registration regime, primarily focused on AML/CTF compliance. It does not imply a full prudential licensing similar to banks, traditional investment firms, or e-money institutions. The FSMA grants "registration" but does not "license" in the broader financial sense that implies comprehensive prudential oversight of capital, risk management beyond AML, consumer protection, etc.

licensing 20% confidence

Future Regime (EU MiCA): The upcoming EU Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation will introduce a comprehensive, harmonized licensing regime across the EU for a much broader range of crypto-asset services. This will supersede the current national AML-driven registration frameworks for many activities.

licensing 86% confidence

The primary Belgian transposition of AMLD5 is the Act of 5 August 2020 implementing the fifth Anti‑Money Laundering Directive, which amends the Act of 18 September 2017 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and on the restriction of the use of cash; it can be found on the official Belgian legislative database (e.g., https://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/loi/loi.htm) by searching by date and title.

custody 100% confidence

Requirement: Providers of "custodian wallet services" are required to register with the FSMA. This is not a full financial services license but an AML registration.

custody 95% confidence

Legal Basis: The Law of 18 September 2017 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and on the restriction of the use of cash. Specifically, Article 5, §1, 37° designates "providers of custodian wallets" as entities subject to AML/CFT obligations.

custody 70% confidence

In Belgium’s twin‑peaks model, virtual asset service providers and similar intermediaries that fall under the FSMA’s remit must register and provide information on the company, its governance and internal organization, shareholders, and their AML/CFT policies and procedures. The FSMA assesses these elements in line with its conduct‑of‑business and AML supervisory role, while key prudential and certain fit‑and‑proper/AML responsibilities for many institutions lie with the National Bank of Belgium (NBB).

custody 95% confidence

Authorization: Providers of "safekeeping and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients" will need to obtain authorization as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) from their national competent authority (the FSMA in Belgium). This is a more comprehensive authorization than the current AML registration.

custody 90% confidence

Details (Article 67(2)): Providers of safekeeping and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients must:

travel-rule 85% confidence

EU Level: Yes, the FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16) has been adopted at the EU level through the recast Transfer of Funds Regulation (TFR). This is Regulation (EU) 2023/1113, which specifically extends the rules on information accompanying transfers of funds to transfers of crypto-assets.

travel-rule 95% confidence

Belgian Level: As an EU Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 is directly applicable in Belgium without the need for national transposition into Belgian law. Belgium's existing AML/CFT framework (primarily the Law of 18 September 2017) provides the national enforcement and supervisory structure, and will be supplemented by the TFR.

travel-rule 100% confidence

The recast Transfer of Funds Regulation (EU) 2023/1113 will apply from 30 December 2024.

travel-rule 95% confidence

The Travel Rule applies to all crypto-asset transfers involving a CASP, but with differentiated requirements based on transaction value: transfers below €1,000 require only wallet addresses (originator and beneficiary distributed ledger addresses), while transfers of €1,000 or more require full identifying information including names, addresses, and IDs. For self-hosted wallets, ownership verification is only required for amounts exceeding €1,000.

travel-rule 95% confidence

Unlike traditional wire transfers where there might be a threshold for full data collection, for crypto-asset transfers handled by CASPs, there is no de minimis threshold. Information must be collected and transmitted for every transaction.

travel-rule 80% confidence

Penalties for non-compliance with AML/CFT obligations in Belgium are primarily established in the Law of 18 September 2017 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing and on the limitation of the use of cash (as amended), which remains the core AML/CFT framework but has since been supplemented and strengthened by additional measures and supervisory powers, including enhanced sanctions and public-naming powers introduced following Belgium’s recent FATF evaluation.

travel-rule 86% confidence

In the Belgian context, FSMA refers to the Financial Services and Markets Authority, a financial regulator that can impose substantial administrative sanctions (including high monetary fines, public warnings/reprimands, and withdrawal of authorisation) under Belgian financial legislation. This is distinct from the U.S. Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), which is a U.S. food safety law enforced by the FDA and does not act as a Belgian supervisory authority or impose euro‑denominated travel‑rule fines.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Criminal Penalties: Serious or repeated breaches can also lead to criminal sanctions, including imprisonment for natural persons and substantially higher criminal fines for both natural and legal persons.

aml 100% confidence

Impact: Extended the scope of AML/CFT rules to include providers engaged in exchange services between virtual currencies and fiat currencies, and custodian wallet providers. This mandated registration requirements at the national level.

aml 75% confidence

The NBB shares AML/CFT supervision of crypto-asset service providers with the ECB under the AMLA framework (2025), with the ECB now holding primary prudential oversight of significant crypto firms, while the NBB retains registration and AML/CFT responsibilities for smaller/non-significant providers.

aml 90% confidence

Impact: MiCA provides a harmonized regulatory framework across the EU for crypto-assets not covered by existing financial services legislation. It covers the issuance, public offering, and admission to trading of various crypto-assets, as well as the authorization and supervision of crypto-asset service providers (CASPs). This is the most significant piece of legislation for the future of crypto regulation in Belgium.

enforcement 70% confidence

Legal Basis: The Law of 18 September 2017 on the prevention of money laundering and terrorist financing and on the restriction of the use of cash. Specifically, Article 5, §1, 37° designates "providers of custodian wallets" as entities subject to AML/CFT obligations.

tax 95% confidence

Rate: Taxed as "professional income" at progressive personal income tax rates (which can go up to 50% for the highest brackets, plus municipal surcharges).

tax 95% confidence

Rate: Taxed under corporate income tax rules. The standard corporate tax rate in Belgium is currently 25% (for large companies; reduced rates may apply for small and medium-sized enterprises on the first €100,000 of profit under certain conditions).

tax 95% confidence

Professional Income: Progressive personal income tax rates (up to 50%+) for professional activity.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP is permitted in Belgium but must incorporate locally and register with the FSMA under the current AML/CFT registration regime (Law of 18 September 2017, transposing 5AMLD), with a transition to full MiCA CASP authorization from 30 December 2024, bringing comprehensive prudential, custody, and Travel Rule obligations.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?