Crypto-funded debit card in Benin

For BJ AML purposes, institutions must identify customers and (where required) beneficial owners and verify their identities on a risk‑based basis, which may be satisfied by customer certifications or existing reliable information; independent source documents such as national ID cards, passports, driver’s licenses, or proof of address are no longer mandatorily required in every case but are expected where the risk profile or inconsistencies warrant stronger verification.

For legal entities, obtain and record basic information such as the company name, proof of incorporation, legal form, registered office address, and the identity of directors; beneficial ownership information should also be identified and verified under applicable AML/KYC rules, but it is not generally available through ordinary public company-search tools.

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer.

Purpose and Intended Nature of Business: Understand the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship.

Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct ongoing due diligence on the business relationship and scrutinize transactions to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile.

Risk-Based Approach: Apply a risk-based approach, meaning enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk situations (e.g., customers from high-risk jurisdictions, politically exposed persons - PEPs, complex transactions) and simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower-risk situations.

"Travel Rule" (FATF Recommendation 16): While implementation varies, VASPs are expected to obtain and transmit required originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers (above a certain threshold), similar to traditional wire transfers.

Obligation to Report: Any VASP that suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of a criminal activity, or are related to terrorist financing, must report promptly to the FIU.

No Tipping-Off: VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or third parties that an STR is being or has been filed.

Duration: Records of transactions and customer identification data must generally be kept for at least five (5) years after the business relationship is terminated or after the date of the transaction.

Type of Records: This includes all customer identification data (e.g., copies of identification documents), account files, business correspondence, and transaction data (e.g., amounts, dates, types of transactions, involved parties).

Availability: Records must be sufficient to permit the reconstruction of individual transactions and be made available to competent authorities upon request.

Benin’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) is the Cellule Nationale de Traitement des Informations Financières (CENTIF). CENTIF is an administrative financial intelligence unit under the Minister of Finance, with financial and decision-making autonomy, responsible for receiving, analyzing, enriching and transmitting suspicious transaction reports and other relevant financial information to competent authorities for the purposes of combating money laundering and terrorist financing, and for coordinating and supporting national AML/CFT policy and strategy.

To date, there is no specific legislation or regulatory framework in Benin or by the BCEAO that explicitly classifies stablecoins as e-money, payment tokens, or securities.

The BCEAO has consistently stated that these assets are not legal tender in the UEMOA zone and are not regulated by the central bank.

The most significant regulatory pronouncement is the BCEAO Communiqué N° 004/2020/RB du 29 janvier 2020 sur les monnaies virtuelles et crypto-actifs.

Any entity wishing to operate as an electronic money issuer must be licensed by the BCEAO under the aforementioned Instruction N° 002/2018/RB. This is a rigorous process, and it's highly unlikely that a decentralized, privately issued stablecoin would meet these criteria without significant structural changes to fit the e-money definition.

No specific licensing regime for stablecoin issuers. As with reserve requirements, there is no framework for licensing an entity whose primary business is the issuance of stablecoins.

Evidence fact bj.enforcement.developing-frameworks not found (may have been renamed).

Evidence fact bj.enforcement.focus-on-fraud not found (may have been renamed).

Evidence fact bj.enforcement.limited-public-reporting not found (may have been renamed).

As of March 2026, the BCEAO has authorized only two structures for payment services in Benin, per its official publication.

No Crypto-Specific Rate: There are no specific capital gains tax rates for cryptocurrencies in Benin.

Potential Interpretation: If the DGI were to view cryptocurrencies as a "movable asset" or a "financial instrument," any profits derived from their sale or exchange could theoretically be subject to general capital gains provisions.