← Regulations / Bolivia / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in Bolivia

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Not permitted AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is not permitted in Bolivia.

Verdict Details

Permitted
no
Local entity required
No
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • BCB Resolution No. 044/2014 prohibits the use and commercialization of any currency not issued by the national monetary authority within the national financial system, effectively banning crypto — so no lawful AML framework for custodial wallet services currently exists.
  • ASFI periodically issues warnings that the use of cryptoassets is not authorized in Bolivia (ASFI Nota de Prensa N° 004/2023).

Key Restrictions

  • BCB Resolution No. 044/2014 (May 6, 2014) explicitly prohibits the use and commercialization of cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, etc. within the financial system.
  • ASFI and BCB have consistently reiterated this prohibition since 2014 — there is no licensed pathway for custodial wallet / SaaS operators.
  • Enforcement actions (e.g. G7 Inversiones, Omega Pro) target fraud/pyramid schemes using crypto; a custodial wallet provider would fall under the general prohibition.

Key Risks

  • No legal framework exists for custodial wallet services — operating would be per se illegal under BCB Resolution 044/2014.
  • Enforcement risk from Policía Boliviana, Ministerio Público, and ASFI; individuals/groups involved with crypto intermediation have faced arrests and asset freezes.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: while Bolivia has begun shifting toward controlled regulation of crypto (from a complete ban), no implementing regulations for custodial services have been issued.
  • Asset recovery risk: decentralized nature of crypto complicates recovery if assets are frozen/seized.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 100% confidence

Regulatory Reference: Resolución del Directorio del BCB No. 044/2014 (Resolution of the BCB Board No. 044/2014), issued on May 6, 2014.

licensing 100% confidence

Key Provision: This resolution explicitly prohibits the use and commercialization of any currency or coin that is not issued and controlled by the national monetary authority within the national financial system. This effectively bans cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and others from being used as means of payment or stored value within the formal financial system.

licensing 100% confidence

Reasoning: The BCB cited concerns about the lack of regulation, security, and stability, as well as the potential for illicit activities like money laundering and fraud.

licensing 90% confidence

Since 2014, the BCB and the Autoridad de Supervisión del Sistema Financiero (ASFI) (Authority for the Supervision of the Financial System) have periodically reiterated this prohibition and issued warnings against the use of cryptocurrencies.

enforcement 85% confidence

Violation Type: Primarily fraud, pyramid scheme (estafa con promesa de rendimientos extraordinarios), illicit financial intermediation, and sometimes money laundering. Cryptocurrencies are often a tool used in these schemes to obscure transactions or give an appearance of legitimacy/innovation. Penalty Amount: Not applicable as a direct "penalty for crypto violation." Penalties are sought under existing criminal laws for fraud, which can include imprisonment and restitution to victims. Specific fines for the crypto aspect are not typically levied. Outcome: Arrests of perpetrators, freezing of assets (where possible), public warnings against these types of investments, and ongoing legal proceedings for fraud. The use of cryptocurrencies in these schemes often complicates asset recovery due to their decentralized nature.

enforcement 70% confidence

Outcome: Arrests of perpetrators, freezing of assets (where possible), public warnings against these types of investments, and ongoing legal proceedings for fraud. The use of cryptocurrencies in these schemes often complicates asset recovery due to their decentralized nature.

licensing 95% confidence

Investigations and arrests related to fraud or pyramid schemes that utilize cryptocurrencies: These are often led by the police and public prosecutor's office, with the primary violation being fraud or illicit financial schemes, rather than simply possessing or trading crypto.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Not permitted — Bolivia maintains a general prohibition on cryptocurrency use and commercialization under BCB Resolution No. 044/2014, with no licensing pathway for custodial wallet / SaaS operators; although Bolivia has signaled a shift toward controlled regulation, no implementing framework for such services exists yet.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?