← Regulations / Bhutan / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Bhutan

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Bhutan with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Collect and verify customer identity (name, DOB, nationality, citizenship ID, address) under the AMLCFT Act 2018 and RMA AML/CFT Guidelines.
  • Beneficial Ownership identification: Identify and verify natural persons who ultimately own/control the customer.
  • Ongoing Due Diligence: Monitor business relationships and transactions to ensure consistency with customer knowledge and risk profile.
  • Risk-Based Approach: Apply Simplified CDD (low risk), Standard CDD (normal), or Enhanced CDD/EDD (high risk, PEPs, complex transactions).
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Report any transaction (no minimum threshold) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing to the FIU (housed within the RMA).
  • No Tipping-Off: Prohibition on disclosing STR filings to customers or third parties.
  • Record-keeping: Retain customer identification data, transaction records, and business correspondence for a minimum of 5 years after relationship/transaction end.
  • FATF Travel Rule compliance expected (Recommendation 16) — obtain/transmit originator and beneficiary info for virtual asset transfers, though not explicitly codified in Bhutanese law for VASPs.

Key Restrictions

  • On-shore VASP must be incorporated in Bhutan and obtain a specific Digital Asset Trading and Custody Services License under the RMA's April 30, 2025 regulatory framework.
  • The Gelephu Mindfulness City (GMC) offers a fast-track licensing pathway for crypto firms, including custodial services — operators may need to operate through GMC for regulatory clarity.
  • No specific digital asset custody license previously existed; framework is evolving — the RMA has moved from a prohibitive stance to a phased regulatory approach.
  • Client asset segregation rules for digital assets are not specifically codified; reliance on general fiduciary principles from existing financial institution licenses.
  • No mandated cold storage requirements, no qualified custodian definitions, and no specific insurance/bonding requirements for digital asset custodians exist.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: The RMA only issued its formal regulatory framework on April 30, 2025 — the regime is new and untested, with limited operational precedent.
  • Enforcement precedent: The government has conducted large bitcoin transactions (e.g., 90 BTC transfers, $237M+ outflows) but stated it does not recall selling any bitcoin, suggesting poor record-keeping and potential governance risks.
  • Tax uncertainty: No explicit crypto tax guidance from the Department of Revenue and Customs; capital gains treatment is ambiguous and contradictory across sources.
  • Dual-track regime: The GMC special administrative region offers different rules (zero capital gains tax) vs. the rest of Bhutan, creating structural complexity and potential arbitrage risks.
  • Prohibitive public stance: The RMA has historically warned the public against crypto and effectively prohibited licensed financial institutions from processing crypto transactions — the new framework may face slow adoption and limited banking access.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

For the Public and Licensed Financial Institutions: The Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan (RMA) has adopted a cautious and prohibitive stance. There is no legal framework to permit or regulate private crypto trading, exchanges, or virtual asset service providers (VASPs) for the general public. Licensed financial institutions (banks, non-bank financial institutions) are generally prohibited from dealing with virtual assets, processing transactions related to them, or providing services to crypto businesses. This effectively acts as a de facto ban on public participation in the unregulated crypto market.

licensing 85% confidence

For State-Owned Entities: In contrast, Bhutan has strategically engaged with cryptocurrency through Druk Holdings & Investments (DHI), the sovereign wealth fund. DHI has been involved in Bitcoin mining and holds significant crypto assets, indicating a state-controlled, strategic adoption rather than an open market approach.

licensing 95% confidence

Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan (RMA):

licensing 85% confidence

RMA Circulars and Public Notices: The RMA has issued warnings and advisories to the public and financial institutions concerning the risks of cryptocurrencies, highlighting their unregulated nature, volatility, and potential for fraud and money laundering. These directives effectively prohibit licensed financial institutions from facilitating crypto-related transactions. Specific circular numbers and dates are often for internal circulation or specific institutions, but the general public advisories are consistent.

licensing 85% confidence

Crypto Trading: For the general public in Bhutan, crypto trading is heavily restricted and effectively prohibited through the formal financial system. The RMA's stance discourages and prevents licensed financial institutions from processing transactions related to virtual assets. This means individuals cannot easily buy or sell cryptocurrencies via traditional banking channels within Bhutan.

licensing 80% confidence

Crypto Exchanges: There are no licensed or regulated cryptocurrency exchanges operating for the public within Bhutan. The regulatory environment does not support their establishment or operation for public access. Any involvement would be considered operating outside the formal financial system and could carry significant risks for participants.

custody 90% confidence

Bhutan’s Gelephu Mindfulness City has introduced a fast-track licensing pathway for crypto firms, including custodial services, which streamlines approval and banking access.

custody 90% confidence

No specific "digital asset custody license" currently exists.

custody 85% confidence

The Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan (RMA) issued a formal communication on April 30, 2025, establishing a focused and phased regulatory position on cryptocurrencies, which means digital asset activities are now subject to a specific regulatory framework rather than solely existing financial services licenses such as banking or payments licenses.

custody 75% confidence

Entities providing virtual asset services in Bhutan, including custody, are subject to a specific Digital Asset Trading and Custody Services License regime, not merely AML/CFT registration. This licensing framework inherently includes AML/CFT obligations such as customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and suspicious transaction reporting, but the primary regulatory obligation is the specialized license, not just AML/CFT requirements alone.

custody 100% confidence

Pending Custody Legislation:

custody 80% confidence

Segregation of Client Assets Rules:

custody 90% confidence

Cold Storage Mandates:

custody 100% confidence

Qualified Custodian Definitions:

aml 60% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act of Bhutan (AMLCFT Act) 2018: This is the cornerstone legislation for AML/CFT in Bhutan. While it may not explicitly name "cryptocurrency" or "virtual assets" in all its provisions, its broad definitions and regulatory scope are intended to cover evolving financial instruments and services that fall under the FATF's purview.

aml 60% confidence

AML/CFT Guidelines for Financial Institutions (2018): Issued by the RMA, these guidelines provide detailed instructions and requirements for financial institutions to implement the provisions of the AML/CFT Act. While not specifically named for VASPs, these guidelines generally apply to any entity falling under the scope of "financial institutions" or "reporting entities" for AML/CFT purposes.

aml 90% confidence

Identification and Verification:

aml 90% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identifying and verifying the natural persons who ultimately own or control the customer, or the natural person on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.

aml 90% confidence

Ongoing Due Diligence: Conducting ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions to ensure they are consistent with the entity's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including the source of funds.

aml 90% confidence

Risk-Based Approach: Applying CDD measures based on the risk associated with the customer, product, service, or jurisdiction. This means:

aml 95% confidence

Obligation to Report: Any transaction (regardless of amount) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that it may be linked to money laundering, terrorist financing, or other criminal activity must be reported.

aml 60% confidence

No Tipping-Off: Reporting entities and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR has been or will be filed.

aml 80% confidence

Duration: Records must generally be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after the date of the transaction.

aml 70% confidence

FATF "Travel Rule": The FATF's Interpretive Note 15 (Recommendation 16) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. While not explicitly codified in Bhutanese law for VASPs, the RMA would likely expect VASPs to comply with this as part of their broader AML/CFT obligations, consistent with international standards.

aml 90% confidence

Licensing: As of current public information, Bhutan does not have a distinct licensing framework specifically for VASPs. However, depending on the nature of their activities (e.g., if they provide services similar to traditional financial institutions), they may be required to obtain a license under the Financial Institutions Act or operate under specific regulatory guidance from the RMA.

tax 85% confidence

Cryptocurrencies are not explicitly illegal in Bhutan, and while they are not recognized as legal tender or regulated financial assets by the Royal Monetary Authority, certain digital assets are now formally recognized and regulated under the Gelephu Mindfulness City (GMC) special administrative region, which issues licenses for digital asset trading and custody services.

tax 95% confidence

The RMA issued warnings about virtual asset risks prior to April 30, 2025, but on that date it updated its position to permit cryptocurrency trading under a regulatory framework, meaning the RMA now both warns and permits such activities.

tax 80% confidence

Capital gains from the sale of cryptocurrencies are generally subject to the 10% capital gains tax under Bhutan's existing tax code for 'property and other assets,' but Gelephu Mindfulness City (a special administrative region) offers a zero capital gains tax framework for regulated crypto firms operating under its fast-track licensing system.

tax 76% confidence

Bhutan currently has no generally applicable 10% capital gains tax on gains from the sale of shares, land, or buildings; recent Bhutanese sources state that Bhutan has no specific capital gains tax and that, under the Income Tax Act 2025 effective 1 January 2026, there will be no capital gains tax for individuals selling personal assets outside business use, so any remaining capital‑gains‑type taxation is limited and the earlier description of standard 10% rates is no longer accurate.

tax 90% confidence

No Crypto-Specific Reporting: Currently, there are no specific reporting requirements for individuals or businesses regarding their cryptocurrency holdings or transactions in Bhutan.

tax 100% confidence

Department of Revenue and Customs (DRC):

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — On-shore VASPs are permitted in Bhutan but only under a newly issued (April 2025) Digital Asset Trading and Custody Services License from the RMA, with high licensing burden, local incorporation required, and a developing regulatory framework that remains ambiguous on tax treatment and operational specifics.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?