← Regulations / Belarus / Operating Models / Self-custodial wallet

Self-custodial wallet / non-custodial software in Belarus

Publisher of software where users hold their own private keys. The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Self-custodial wallet is conditionally permitted in Belarus with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and none licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
None
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • No AML obligations attach to the publisher of self-custodial/non-custodial software, because the publisher never holds, controls, or accesses user funds, and does not engage in 'storage of tokens on their own accounts' as defined in Art. 4.2 of Decree No. 8. The AML framework under Law No. 165-Z and HTP rules applies to VASPs that provide custody, exchange, or transfer services — not to software publishers.
  • However, if the software is distributed as part of a broader VASP service (e.g., integrated fiat on-ramp or swap functionality controlled by the publisher), AML obligations would attach at the VASP level.

Key Restrictions

  • No local license or registration is required solely for publishing self-custodial wallet software in Belarus, as the publisher does not engage in regulated activities (custody, exchange, transfer of tokens) under Decree No. 8.
  • If the publisher provides any ancillary services that involve holding, storing, or transferring tokens on behalf of users, HTP residency and full compliance with Decree No. 8 would be required.
  • The software publisher must not hold user private keys, access user funds, or offer custodial services — doing so would trigger HTP licensing requirements.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: Belarusian authorities may reinterpret 'storage of tokens' broadly, potentially attempting to classify wallet publishers as regulated entities even where no custody occurs.
  • Enforcement risk: If the wallet contains integrated features (e.g., swap aggregators, fiat on-ramps) that route through a Belarusian entity, authorities may view the publisher as operating an unregistered crypto exchange.
  • Risk of HTP scrutiny: Even non-custodial software publishers with Belarusian ties could be investigated if authorities suspect that the software facilitates unlicensed exchange or transfer activity.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 85% confidence

Presidential Decree No. 8 (2017) initially legalized cryptocurrencies and set a framework for activities like mining, exchange, and token creation in Belarus, but subsequent regulatory actions by Belarusian authorities have narrowed its scope by preapproving only 26 specific cryptocurrencies for processing by cryptobanks, imposing restrictions not present in the original decree.

licensing 100% confidence

Relevant Provisions in Decree No. 8: Article 4.2 of Decree No. 8 defines "cryptocurrency exchange operator" and "other operator" as entities engaging in activities like storage, transfer, and exchange of digital signs (tokens). It explicitly states that "storage of tokens on their own accounts for their clients" is an activity permitted for HTP residents.

licensing 60% confidence

No standalone "custodial license": Belarus does not issue a specific "digital asset custodial license" in the traditional sense, separate from a broader digital asset service provider license.

licensing 100% confidence

HTP residency grants the right to engage in activities related to digital tokens, including their storage and transfer.

aml 95% confidence

Decree of the President of the Republic of Belarus No. 8 "On the Development of the Digital Economy" dated December 21, 2017 (as amended): This foundational decree legalizes and regulates activities involving digital tokens (cryptocurrencies) for Hi-Tech Park residents, including exchanges, initial coin offerings (ICOs), and other related services. It explicitly mandates that HTP residents engaged in these activities must comply with AML/CFT legislation.

aml 60% confidence

Law of the Republic of Belarus No. 165-Z "On Measures for Preventing the Legalization of Proceeds from Crime, Financing of Terrorist Activities and Financing the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction" dated June 30, 2014 (as amended): This is the overarching national AML/CFT law that applies to all financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) in Belarus, including those operating under Decree No. 8 when conducting financial operations involving virtual assets. It outlines the general principles and specific obligations for AML/CFT compliance.

enforcement 95% confidence

Entity Targeted: WhiteBird LLC (the Belarusian legal entity associated with the WhiteBIT crypto exchange). Violation Type: Failure to comply with the requirements for Hi-Tech Park residency and the norms of Decree No. 8. While specific details are often not fully disclosed by HTP, such exclusions typically stem from operational deficiencies, non-compliance with AML/CFT standards, or failure to meet the requirements of the special legal regime. Penalty Amount: Loss of HTP residency (effectively, revocation of its operating license in Belarus). No specific monetary fine for the exclusion itself is usually reported. Outcome: WhiteBird LLC was excluded from the HTP. This led to WhiteBIT announcing the cessation of services for residents of Belarus as of March 2024.

enforcement 90% confidence

Entity Targeted: Individuals and organized criminal groups operating unregistered crypto exchanges, engaging in investment fraud schemes involving crypto, or using crypto for money laundering. Violation Type: Illegal entrepreneurial activity (operating a crypto exchange without HTP registration), fraud, money laundering, theft of crypto assets. Penalty Amount: Varies greatly. These are criminal cases, leading to arrests, investigations, and potential imprisonment, confiscation of assets, and restitution orders. The "penalty amount" is not a fixed fine but relates to the scale of the illicit activity (e.g., millions of dollars laundered or stolen) and subsequent asset seizures. Outcome: Arrests, initiation of criminal proceedings, asset seizures (including crypto and traditional assets), and potential convictions with prison sentences.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — Publishing self-custodial wallet software in Belarus does not trigger VASP classification or AML obligations because the publisher never holds or controls user funds; however, adding any custody, exchange, or transfer service would require HTP residency and full compliance with Decree No. 8 and Belarusian AML law.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • Does software publishing trigger VASP / MSB classification?
  • Do AML obligations attach when no custody exists?
  • What disclosure or consumer-protection rules apply?