← Regulations / Chile / Operating Models / Remote VASP

Remote VASP serving residents in Chile

Foreign-incorporated entity that offers exchange, custody, or transfer services to residents of a jurisdiction without establishing a local entity or office.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Remote VASP is conditionally permitted in Chile with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Register with the CMF (Financial Market Commission) under the Fintech Law (Ley N° 21.521) as a VASP, which is a formal licensing process requiring authorization and registration.
  • Designate a compliance officer and implement AML/CFT policies per UAF Circular N° 49 (risk management) and Circular N° 57 (VASP designation as obligated entities under Law N° 19.913).
  • Conduct Customer Due Diligence (CDD) including identity verification (individuals and legal entities), beneficial ownership identification, and purpose-of-business assessment.
  • Apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) per UAF Circular N° 50.
  • Perform ongoing transaction monitoring and risk-based CDD measures per UAF Circular N° 52.
  • Report suspicious transactions (ROS) to the UAF (Financial Analysis Unit) per UAF Circular N° 58 — any unusual or suspicious activity must be reported regardless of amount.
  • Comply with FATF Travel Rule per UAF Circular N° 79: obtain, verify, store, and transmit originator and beneficiary information for transfers ≥ USD/EUR 1,000 (VASP-to-VASP), and apply EDD for unhosted wallet transactions.
  • Screen against sanctions lists and report terrorism-financing concerns per UAF Circular N° 51.
  • Meet minimum capital and guarantee requirements (to be specified in CMF secondary regulations).
  • Maintain and preserve CDD and transaction records for the period required by Law N° 19.913 and UAF regulations.

Key Restrictions

  • Must be incorporated and registered as a VASP with the CMF in Chile (local entity required); remote, unregistered cross-border service to residents is not permitted.
  • Client assets must be segregated from the VASP's own assets (prohibition of commingling) per Ley N° 21.521, Article 19.
  • Must comply with UAF Circular N° 79 Travel Rule requirements — requires technical capability to transmit originator/beneficiary data to counterparty VASPs for transfers ≥ USD/EUR 1,000.
  • Secondary regulations from the CMF may impose additional operational, cybersecurity, and capital requirements still in development.
  • The Fintech Law applies to exchange, custody, transfer, and payment initiation services — any remote operator engaging in these activities with Chilean residents must register.

Key Risks

  • Criminal enforcement risk: Operating without registration under the Fintech Law may expose individuals/entities to fraud (estafa) charges under Article 161-A of the Chilean Penal Code, carrying imprisonment (reclusión menor) and fines of 50–500 UTM.
  • Precedent of aggressive prosecution: Chilean authorities (Fiscalía) have pursued criminal cases against unlicensed crypto operators (Mind Capital, Generación Zoe, IM Forex) with arrests, formal charges, and ongoing proceedings since 2020–2021.
  • Regulatory ambiguity in secondary rules: Some CMF secondary regulations are still being developed, creating compliance uncertainty for capital/guarantee requirements and operational details.
  • Tax and reputational risk: Unregistered operators may face tax evasion investigations via the SII and CMF anti-avoidance rules under Resolution 79/2025.
  • The CMF has issued public warnings naming specific unregistered platforms and continues dynamic enforcement, increasing visibility and scrutiny of unlicensed operators.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 100% confidence

Ley N° 21.521 (Fintech Law):

licensing 100% confidence

Comisión para el Mercado Financiero (CMF):

licensing 100% confidence

The CMF has issued multiple specific updated alerts in 2026 naming particular unregulated entities and platforms, indicating dynamic enforcement rather than static general warnings.

licensing 90% confidence

Chile’s 2023 Fintech Law and General Rule No. 502 now directly regulate all crypto service providers through a formal licensing and registration regime, replacing earlier implicit warnings. The entity targeted is no longer just the general public and unregistered platforms, but all market participants subject to enforceable obligations under the Securities Market Law.

licensing 90% confidence

Chile's regulatory framework under Resolution 79/2025 imposes strict oversight and reporting obligations on digital marketplaces and payment facilitators, with punitive enforcement measures (e.g., anti-avoidance rules) to combat non-compliance, tax evasion, and fraud—not merely preventative warnings.

licensing 76% confidence

For the relevant Chilean offense, Article 161-A of the Chilean Penal Code establishes a fixed statutory penalty range: imprisonment of reclusión menor in any of its degrees plus a fine of 50 to 500 UTM, increased to reclusión menor in its maximum degree plus a fine of 100 to 500 UTM if the same person both obtains and discloses the material; penalties are therefore not left open-ended to generic criminal charges, asset freezes, and restitution alone but are set by law within these ranges.

aml 60% confidence

UAF Circular N° 57 (Circular N°57 de la UAF): This is the most crucial piece of regulation for VASPs. Issued by the UAF, Circular N° 57 (published in October 2020) explicitly designates "Providers of Virtual Asset Services" (PSAV) as obligated entities under Law N° 19.913. This means VASPs must comply with all AML/CFT obligations applicable to other financial institutions.

aml 100% confidence

Ley N° 19.913, que Crea la Unidad de Análisis Financiero y Modifica Diversas Disposiciones en Materia de Lavado y Blanqueo de Activos (Law N° 19.913, which Creates the Financial Analysis Unit and Modifies Various Provisions Regarding Asset Laundering and Blanqueo de Activos): This is the main AML/CFT law in Chile, establishing the UAF and defining the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering and terrorist financing.

aml 95% confidence

Circular N° 49 de la UAF: Establishes general instructions on risk management and prevention of ML/FT for obligated entities, including policies, procedures, internal controls, and designated compliance officers.

aml 90% confidence

Circular N° 50 de la UAF: Provides instructions for identifying Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs).

aml 80% confidence

Circular N° 51 de la UAF: Establishes instructions regarding the detection and reporting of transactions related to terrorism financing and compliance with international sanctions lists.

aml 80% confidence

Circular N° 52 de la UAF: Details instructions for conducting risk assessments for ML/FT.

aml 80% confidence

Circular N° 58 de la UAF: Modifies and updates the instructions for reporting suspicious activities (ROS) and other information to the UAF.

aml 60% confidence

Obligation to Report: VASPs are required to report any operation, transaction, business, or activity that they identify as unusual or suspicious, as well as any attempts to carry out such activities, regardless of the amount.

aml 95% confidence

Identification and Verification:

aml 90% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and verify the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the customer, or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.

aml 90% confidence

Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitor the business relationship and transactions to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including the source of funds.

aml 90% confidence

Risk-Based Approach: Apply CDD measures according to the level of risk associated with the customer, product, service, or geographic area. Higher risk scenarios require Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD).

aml 90% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): Implement enhanced due diligence (EDD) measures for PEPs, including obtaining senior management approval for establishing business relationships and taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and source of funds.

travel-rule 95% confidence

UAF Circular N° 79 was issued and became effective on July 11, 2022. This circular brought PSAVs under the scope of AML/CFT obligations in Chile, including the principles of the Travel Rule.

travel-rule 90% confidence

For transfers between VASPs (VASP-to-VASP), the originating VASP must obtain and transmit required originator and beneficiary information for transactions equal to or exceeding USD/EUR 1,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies or virtual assets).

travel-rule 90% confidence

For transfers from an unhosted wallet to a VASP, or from a VASP to an unhosted wallet, VASPs are expected to obtain the necessary originator or beneficiary information as appropriate, often through enhanced due diligence.

travel-rule 95% confidence

Regarding the Travel Rule specifically, PSAVs must be able to collect, verify, store, and transmit the required originator and beneficiary information to counterparty VASPs.

travel-rule 90% confidence

Technical Implementation Requirements for short-range devices in Chile have been updated by SUBTEL Resolution 737, introducing a new self-declaration system, mandatory QR codes, updated test report procedures, and new rules for implantable medical devices.

custody 85% confidence

Any entity intending to provide virtual asset custody services in Chile must register with the Financial Market Commission (CMF) via the Financial Services Register, as established by the Fintech Law.

custody 90% confidence

Authorization and Registration: Providers of virtual asset services, including custody, must obtain authorization and be registered with the CMF.

custody 95% confidence

Prohibition of Commingling: Entities providing custody services for virtual assets are prohibited from mixing client assets with their own proprietary assets.

custody 95% confidence

Capital and Guarantees: Regulated entities, including VASPs offering custody, must maintain adequate own capital and provide guarantees to back their operations and cover potential liabilities. These requirements are intended to protect clients and ensure the stability of the service provider.

enforcement 50% confidence

Entity Targeted: General public, and implicitly, unregulated entities operating in the crypto space. Specific warnings target individual unregistered platforms. Violation Type: Operating outside regulatory oversight, potential for fraud or financial instability. The warnings themselves are preventative, not punitive. Penalty Amount: No direct penalties attached to a warning. Penalties would come from future enforcement actions under the new FinTech Law, once fully implemented.

enforcement 100% confidence

Entity Targeted: Individuals associated with "Mind Capital" in Chile, notably promoters and recruiters of the scheme. Violation Type: Alleged multi-level marketing scheme, fraud (estafa), swindling, and illegal banking activities, using cryptocurrencies as a facade. Outcome: Criminal proceedings are ongoing against several individuals involved in promoting and operating the scheme within Chile. The goal is to prosecute those responsible and recover funds for victims.

enforcement 100% confidence

Entity Targeted: Chilean individuals and entities linked to the international "Generación Zoe" and "IM Forex" schemes. Violation Type: Alleged pyramid scheme, fraud (estafa), swindling, and illegal financial operations, misleading investors with promises of high, guaranteed returns using crypto as an investment vehicle. Penalty Amount: Criminal charges have been filed, leading to arrests and asset seizures. Specific penalties (prison sentences, restitution) are pending final judicial decisions. Outcome: Several individuals have been arrested and charged in Chile for their roles in promoting and operating the scheme. The primary operator of Generación Zoe, Leonardo Cositorto, was arrested in Argentina and is facing charges there. Chilean authorities continue to investigate and prosecute local affiliates. Penalty Amount: No direct penalties attached to a warning. Penalties would come from future enforcement actions under the new FinTech Law, once fully implemented. Outcome: Increased public awareness about crypto risks. The FinTech Law now requires Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) to register with the CMF and comply with various regulations (e.g., AML/CFT, consumer protection). This will enable direct regulatory enforcement actions in the future against non-compliant entities.

enforcement 50% confidence

Outcome: Criminal proceedings are ongoing against several individuals involved in promoting and operating the scheme within Chile. The goal is to prosecute those responsible and recover funds for victims.

enforcement 50% confidence

Outcome: Several individuals have been arrested and charged in Chile for their roles in promoting and operating the scheme. The primary operator of Generación Zoe, Leonardo Cositorto, was arrested in Argentina and is facing charges there. Chilean authorities continue to investigate and prosecute local affiliates.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a remote VASP serving Chilean residents must establish a local entity, register with the CMF under the Fintech Law (Ley N° 21.521), comply with comprehensive AML/CFT obligations under UAF Circular N° 57 (including FATF Travel Rule via Circular N° 79), and face potential criminal prosecution for unlicensed operation.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • May a non-resident provider serve residents from abroad?
  • Does cross-border service trigger licensing, registration, or AML obligations?
  • What enforcement risk exists for unlicensed remote operators?