Centralized exchange in Cameroon
Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.
CEX is not permitted in Cameroon.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- no
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Customer identification and verification (full name, date of birth, nationality, address, unique ID, source of funds/wealth) before establishing a business relationship or conducting transactions above EUR 1,000 (or equivalent) — per CEMAC Regulation No. 02/CEMAC/UMAC/CM/22 and Law No. 2016/007.
- Beneficial ownership identification: identify natural persons with ≥25% ownership or effective control, verify their identity.
- Ongoing transaction monitoring and regular updating of customer information and documentation.
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for high-risk situations: PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions (FATF-listed), complex/unusually large transactions, non-face-to-face customers.
- Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) filing: report any suspected or reasonably grounded suspicion of ML/TF to ANIF (Cameroon's FIU) without delay, regardless of amount.
- Record-keeping of customer data and transaction records for the period required by CEMAC/national AML laws.
Key Restrictions
- CEMAC-wide ban on all virtual asset activities by BEAC Communiqué No. 003/GR/2022 (May 2022) — operating a centralized exchange is illegal in the CEMAC zone, including Cameroon.
- Financial institutions (banks, microfinance, payment institutions) are prohibited from holding, facilitating, or dealing in virtual assets.
- No legal framework to license or regulate cryptocurrency exchanges exists — no registration or licensing pathway for VASPs.
- Entities attempting to operate face severe challenges accessing banking services and may be deemed to be operating outside the established financial regulatory framework.
- A local corporate entity and physical presence would be mandatory if any future licensing regime is created.
Key Risks
- Criminal enforcement risk: operating a centralized exchange violates the BEAC crypto ban, punishable by imprisonment (under general financial crime laws), confiscation of assets, and freezing of accounts.
- Enforcement precedent: the Global Investment Trading (GIT) case (2022–2023) resulted in arrests, asset seizures, and ongoing legal proceedings — demonstrates active enforcement against crypto-related financial schemes.
- FATF grey-listing: Cameroon remains under FATF enhanced follow-up, creating additional compliance and reputational pressure on any financial activities.
- Regulatory ambiguity: despite the ban, crypto adoption is significant, creating uncertainty about selective enforcement and potential future regulatory shifts.
- No access to regulated banking services: inability to obtain banking relationships makes fiat on/off-ramps and operational solvency effectively impossible.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Cryptocurrency Exchanges: There is no legal framework to license or regulate cryptocurrency exchanges. Any entity attempting to operate an exchange would face severe challenges in accessing banking services and could be deemed to be operating outside the established financial regulatory framework.
Custody Providers: Similar to exchanges, no specific license exists. Financial institutions are prohibited from holding or facilitating virtual assets, making traditional custody services for crypto impossible within the regulated sector.
Neither a specific registration nor a licensing regime for VASPs exists in Cameroon. The current environment is effectively one of prohibition for regulated financial entities, without a corresponding framework for independent crypto businesses.
Entities seeking to operate in the crypto space would likely face a lack of legal recognition and significant operational hurdles, particularly concerning banking relationships.
BEAC Communiqué on Cryptocurrencies (December 10, 2021):
Lack of Legal Tender Status: Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender within the CEMAC zone.
Local Presence: For most regulated financial activities in Cameroon, a local corporate entity and physical presence are mandatory. This would likely extend to any future crypto licensing.
CEMAC Regulation No. 02/CEMAC/UMAC/CM/22 on the Fight Against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism in the CEMAC Zone, with Specific Provisions for Virtual Assets: This is the most critical piece of legislation. Adopted in 2022, it explicitly defines "virtual assets" and "virtual asset service providers" and subjects VASPs to the same AML/CFT obligations as traditional financial institutions. It transposes the FATF Recommendations concerning virtual assets.
Law No. 2016/007 of July 12, 2016, on the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing in Cameroon: This national law provides the general framework for AML/CFT in Cameroon, defining obliged entities, establishing the Financial Intelligence Unit (ANIF), and outlining sanctions. While it predates explicit VASP definitions, the CEMAC regulation extends its principles to VASPs.
Identification and Verification of Customers:
Identification of Beneficial Owners:
Continuously monitoring business relationships and transactions to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and their risk profile, including, where necessary, the source of funds.
Applying EDD measures for high-risk situations, including:
Reporting Obligation: VASPs must report any transaction (or attempted transaction) that they suspect, or have reasonable grounds to suspect, is related to money laundering or terrorist financing, regardless of the amount.
No, the FATF Travel Rule has not been adopted for legally operating Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in Cameroon, because virtual asset activities and VASPs are currently prohibited.
In May 2022, the Banque des États de l'Afrique Centrale (BEAC), the central bank for the CEMAC region (Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon), issued a Communiqué (No. 003/GR/2022) that formally banned all cryptocurrency activities in the zone. This communiqué prohibits the holding, buying, selling, and facilitation of transactions involving cryptocurrencies, effectively precluding the legal operation of VASPs.
Not applicable for legal VASP operations. Since virtual asset activities are banned, there are no legally recognized VASPs for whom the Travel Rule would apply or have an effective date.
Violation of the BEAC Cryptocurrency Ban: Operating any virtual asset service provider or engaging in virtual asset transactions in the CEMAC region, including Cameroon, is a violation of the BEAC communiqué. While the communiqué itself might not detail specific penalties, it refers to existing monetary and financial regulations. This could lead to:
Imprisonment (under general financial crime laws).
Confiscation of assets.
Freezing of accounts.
The CEMAC-wide Ban on Crypto-Assets by BEAC: This is a foundational regulatory action that makes all crypto-related activities illegal and provides the basis for enforcement.
Enforcement against crypto-related Ponzi schemes/fraudulent operations.
Outcome: Established a clear and comprehensive prohibition on all crypto-asset related activities across the CEMAC region. This makes any operation of a cryptocurrency exchange, mining operation, or widespread trading highly illegal and subject to enforcement by national authorities (police, judiciary, financial intelligence units) in each CEMAC member state, including Cameroon.
Entity Targeted: Global Investment Trading (GIT) and its founder, Emile Parfait Mbori, along with several associates. Violation Type: Operating an illegal financial scheme (Ponzi scheme), fraud, illegal public offering of financial products, money laundering. Although often marketed as "crypto" (sometimes involving Mofor Coin), the core violation was operating an unregistered and fraudulent investment scheme. Penalty Amount: Not a final judicial penalty yet, as legal proceedings are ongoing. However, significant actions include:.
Outcome: The founder, Emile Parfait Mbori, and several accomplices were arrested and detained. The company's operations were shut down. Legal proceedings are continuing in Cameroonian courts, aiming for convictions and potentially restitution for victims. This case sent a strong signal against unregulated investment schemes, particularly those leveraging the allure of cryptocurrency.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Not permitted — a centralized exchange operating in Cameroon would violate the CEMAC-wide ban on all virtual asset activities (BEAC Communiqué No. 003/GR/2022), with no licensing or registration pathway available, and carries risk of criminal prosecution including imprisonment, asset confiscation, and account freezing.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What exchange / VASP license applies?
- What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
- What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
- What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?