← Regulations / Colombia / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Colombia

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Colombia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with UIAF as an obliged entity under Resolution 314 of 2021 (SARLAFT)
  • Implement customer due diligence (CDD) including identification via Cédula de Ciudadanía (national ID) or NIT for entities, verification of beneficial owners (≥25% ownership), and PEP screening
  • Risk-based approach: apply enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers (PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex structures, high-value transactions)
  • Register and report suspicious transactions (SARs) to UIAF
  • Maintain and implement AML/CFT policies, procedures, and internal controls
  • Train personnel on AML/CFT obligations
  • Screen against UN Security Council sanctions (mandated via UIAF Resolution 314/2021, incorporating UN sanctions into domestic legal system)
  • Ongoing transaction monitoring for consistency with customer risk profile and source of funds/wealth
  • If interacting with the traditional financial system (fiat on/off-ramps), additional obligations from Circular Externa 026 de 2020 (SFC) apply to partner financial institutions

Key Restrictions

  • No specific 'VASP license' exists; operators interact with the financial system either through the 'La Arenera' regulatory sandbox (Decree 1234 of 2020, Circular Externa 021 de 2023) with a regulated partner bank, or remain unlicensed in a grey area if no fiat on/off-ramps are offered
  • Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender and are not regulated by the SFC as financial products or securities (unless they exhibit security-like characteristics)
  • No specific crypto custody license exists; custody services fall under sandbox participation if client assets/fiat are involved, or general principles of financial/trust law if SFC-supervised
  • No specific regulations for segregation of client crypto assets or cold storage mandates (only general cybersecurity and data protection laws apply under Ley 1581 de 2012)
  • No mandatory insurance or bonding requirements for unregulated crypto service providers
  • Must file annual income tax returns declaring crypto income and holdings; VAT (19%) applies to services related to crypto (e.g., platform fees) but not to the crypto transactions themselves
  • Businesses must account for crypto as intangible assets on the balance sheet per DIAN guidance

Key Risks

  • Enforcement precedent: SIC has imposed fines of COP 500M+ and ordered cessation of operations against unregistered crypto-related financial intermediation (OmegaPro, Daily Cop) — risk of being classified as illegal financial intermediation if structure is unclear
  • Criminal enforcement risk: Fiscalía General de la Nación has pursued criminal charges for illegal mass capture of money, aggravated fraud, and money laundering, leading to arrests and asset seizures
  • Regulatory ambiguity: no comprehensive licensing regime exists yet (Ley 2143 of 2021 mandated SFC to propose a framework — still ongoing), creating legal uncertainty for standalone VASPs
  • Grey-area risk: operating without sandbox participation means no SFC supervision but also no clear legal shield against enforcement actions
  • Tax complexity: progressive income tax up to 39% for individuals, 35% corporate rate, 15% capital gains (held ≥2 years), wealth tax exposure for companies in 2026 — complex calculation and reporting obligations

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 20% confidence

Exchanges (Virtual Asset Service Providers - VASPs):

licensing 20% confidence

General Operation: VASPs operating without direct interaction with the traditional financial system (e.g., direct fiat on/off-ramps via banks) are primarily subject to AML/CFT obligations but are not licensed by the SFC. They operate in a somewhat "grey area" from a licensing perspective, though the UIAF views them as obliged entities for AML purposes.

licensing 20% confidence

Interaction with Financial System: If an exchange seeks to offer fiat currency on/off-ramps through Colombian banks, it generally needs to participate in the SFC's Regulatory Sandbox ("La Arenera") in partnership with a regulated financial institution. This sandbox allows for supervised pilot programs.

licensing 20% confidence

Registration Regime (AML/CFT): Colombia primarily operates a registration regime for AML/CFT purposes. All VASPs, regardless of whether they are licensed or participating in the sandbox, are considered "obliged entities" by the Unidad de Información y Análisis Financiero (UIAF) and must:

licensing 95% confidence

Regulatory Sandbox (La Arenera): The closest mechanism for innovation is the SFC's La Arenera, a regulatory sandbox established under Circular Externa 021 de 2023. This allows financial entities (and in certain cases, non-supervised entities in partnership with supervised ones) to test innovative financial services, including those involving crypto assets, under a controlled environment with temporary waivers or specific authorizations. However, participating in La Arenera does not exempt a token from being classified as a security; rather, it allows for a structured dialogue and potential adaptation of regulations if a security token is being tested.

licensing 20% confidence

Ongoing Development: Ley 2143 of 2021 mandated the SFC to propose a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets, indicating a future move towards a more formal licensing system.

aml 100% confidence

Resolución 314 de 2021 de la UIAF: Por la cual se imparten instrucciones relacionadas con el SARLAFT a los proveedores de servicios de activos virtuales.

aml 20% confidence

Decree 1068 of 2015 (as modified by Decree 169 of 2020): This crucial decree explicitly incorporates "virtual assets" into the scope of assets and operations that the UIAF must analyze to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing. It empowers the UIAF to establish reporting requirements for entities involved in operations with virtual assets.

aml 20% confidence

Law 526 of 1999: This law created the Financial Information and Analysis Unit (UIAF) and established its functions as Colombia's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). It is the foundational law for AML/CFT in the country.

aml 20% confidence

FATF Recommendations: As a country committed to international AML/CFT standards, Colombia aligns its regulations with the FATF Recommendations. Recommendation 15 specifically targets new technologies, including virtual assets and VASPs, requiring them to be regulated for AML/CFT purposes, licensed or registered, and subject to effective systems for monitoring and ensuring compliance.

aml 20% confidence

Identification and Verification of Customers:

aml 20% confidence

Identification and verification of beneficial owners (typically individuals holding 25% or more of the company's shares or voting rights, or exercising control through other means).

aml 20% confidence

Risk-Based Approach: VASPs must implement a risk-based approach to CDD. This means applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons - PEPs, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, complex corporate structures, high-value transactions, or unusual transaction patterns) and simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower-risk customers.

aml 100% confidence

UN Sanctions: As a member state of the United Nations, Colombia is legally obligated to implement sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council. UIAF Resolution 314/2021 directly references adherence to UN Security Council resolutions as a core component of ML/TF risk management. This includes asset freezes and other restrictions against listed individuals and entities.

custody 100% confidence

The "La Arenera" Regulatory Sandbox: This is the closest Colombia has to a structured approach for crypto firms.

tax 85% confidence

Virtual assets are intangible assets/goods: For tax purposes, they are considered assets that are part of the taxpayer's patrimony (wealth).

tax 60% confidence

Short-term Trading: If cryptocurrencies are acquired and sold within a short period (generally considered less than two years in Colombia for capital gains distinction), the profit is considered ordinary income. The profit is calculated as the selling price minus the acquisition cost.

tax 80% confidence

Individuals: Subject to the progressive income tax rates in the Colombian Tax Statute (Articles 241, 330, and 336). These rates range from 0% to 39% depending on the taxable income bracket.

tax 100% confidence

Businesses (Legal Entities): Generally subject to the corporate income tax rate, which is 35% (as of 2023-2024).

tax 95% confidence

Services Related to Cryptocurrency: Services provided by third parties related to cryptocurrency operations, such as exchange fees, platform commissions, or transaction fees charged by crypto platforms, are generally subject to the standard VAT rate of 19%. This is because these are services rendered for a fee.

enforcement 100% confidence

Entity Targeted: OmegaPro Group (an international alleged Ponzi scheme), its local promoters, influencers, and related entities operating in Colombia (e.g., Bux Corp, Smart Business Corp). Violation Type: Unregistered and unauthorized financial intermediation, operating a multi-level marketing scheme that promised high returns without proper backing, misleading advertising, consumer fraud, and alleged pyramid scheme. Outcome: SIC ordered the cessation of all promotion and operations of OmegaPro-related schemes in Colombia, imposed significant fines, and mandated restitution to affected consumers. The Fiscalía has pursued criminal charges, leading to arrests of key promoters and the freezing of assets. Many victims have lost significant sums, and the full extent of recovery is uncertain.

enforcement 100% confidence

Entity Targeted: Daily Cop S.A.S. and its founders/promoters (e.g., Camilo Andrés Suárez Aldana, David Mateo Suárez Aldana). Violation Type: Alleged pyramid scheme, unauthorized and illegal financial intermediation using cryptocurrencies as a front, offering unrealistic returns, consumer fraud. Outcome: SIC issued a definitive resolution ordering the immediate cessation of Daily Cop's activities, imposing fines, and requiring restitution. The Fiscalía subsequently arrested key figures behind the scheme and initiated criminal proceedings, uncovering millions of dollars in alleged fraud.

enforcement 96% confidence

Entity Targeted: Local promoters and affiliates of the international Generación Zoe scheme operating in Colombia. Violation Type: Alleged illegal financial intermediation, fraud, and operating a Ponzi/pyramid scheme under the guise of coaching and crypto investments. Penalty Amount: Arrests and criminal charges against Colombian operators. Assets linked to the scheme were seized. Outcome: Colombian authorities, working with international counterparts, arrested individuals linked to Generación Zoe's operations in the country. Criminal proceedings are ongoing for charges related to aggravated fraud and illegal financial intermediation. Outcome: Provided valuable insights for future regulation, demonstrating a willingness by the SFC to study and understand crypto operations under controlled conditions.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP may operate locally by registering with the UIAF as an AML/CFT obliged entity (Resolution 314 of 2021), but to offer fiat on/off-ramps it must enter the La Arenera regulatory sandbox with a regulated financial partner; no comprehensive VASP licensing regime exists yet (pending Ley 2143 of 2021 implementation), creating regulatory grey-area risk and heavy reliance on enforcement precedent from SIC/Fiscalía actions against unregistered crypto financial intermediation.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?