Remote VASP serving residents in Colombia
Foreign-incorporated entity that offers exchange, custody, or transfer services to residents of a jurisdiction without establishing a local entity or office.
Remote VASP is conditionally permitted in Colombia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Medium
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Registration with UIAF as an 'obliged entity' (all VASPs must register for AML/CFT purposes).
- Implement a risk-based AML/CFT program (SARLAFT) per UIAF Resolución 314 de 2021.
- Conduct comprehensive Customer Due Diligence (CDD) including identification of beneficial owners (≥25% shareholding) and PEPs.
- Ongoing transaction monitoring and suspicious transaction reporting (SARs) to the UIAF.
- Maintain policies, procedures, and internal controls for ML/TF prevention.
- Train personnel on AML/CFT obligations.
- Adhere to UN Security Council sanctions as incorporated into Colombian law.
- If interacting with the traditional financial system (fiat on/off-ramps via banks), must enter SFC's La Arenera regulatory sandbox in partnership with a regulated financial institution (per Decree 1234/2020 and Circular Externa 021 de 2023).
Key Restrictions
- Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender and are not regulated by the SFC as financial products or securities (unless they exhibit security-like characteristics).
- No specific license exists for VASPs; operators operate in a regulatory 'grey area' unless they enter the sandbox.
- No specific crypto custody license exists; segregation of client assets is required under general financial law principles if operating under SFC oversight.
- No mandatory insurance or bonding requirements for unregulated crypto service providers.
- No specific legal mandates for cold storage of crypto assets.
Key Risks
- High enforcement risk for unlicensed remote operators: SIC and Fiscalía have aggressively pursued unregistered crypto-related financial intermediation schemes (e.g., OmegaPro, Daily Cop, Generación Zoe) with fines in the hundreds of millions of COP, orders to cease operations, asset seizures, and criminal charges including illegal mass capture of money, aggravated fraud, and money laundering.
- Regulatory ambiguity: The SFC has not yet issued a comprehensive licensing framework despite Ley 2143 of 2021 mandating one, leaving remote VASPs in a grey area with significant interpretation risk.
- Tax exposure: Foreign entities serving Colombian residents without a local entity may face tax withholding agent obligations and related criminal investigations.
- Reputational and operational risk: Being lumped by authorities into the same category as unregistered Ponzi/pyramid schemes, given enforcement patterns.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Exchanges (Virtual Asset Service Providers - VASPs):
General Operation: VASPs operating without direct interaction with the traditional financial system (e.g., direct fiat on/off-ramps via banks) are primarily subject to AML/CFT obligations but are not licensed by the SFC. They operate in a somewhat "grey area" from a licensing perspective, though the UIAF views them as obliged entities for AML purposes.
Interaction with Financial System: If an exchange seeks to offer fiat currency on/off-ramps through Colombian banks, it generally needs to participate in the SFC's Regulatory Sandbox ("La Arenera") in partnership with a regulated financial institution. This sandbox allows for supervised pilot programs.
Registration Regime (AML/CFT): Colombia primarily operates a registration regime for AML/CFT purposes. All VASPs, regardless of whether they are licensed or participating in the sandbox, are considered "obliged entities" by the Unidad de Información y Análisis Financiero (UIAF) and must:
AML/CFT Obligations: All VASPs are subject to Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) requirements, regardless of whether they are licensed or not.
Law 526 of 1999: This law created the Financial Information and Analysis Unit (UIAF) and established its functions as Colombia's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). It is the foundational law for AML/CFT in the country.
Decree 1068 of 2015 (as modified by Decree 169 of 2020): This crucial decree explicitly incorporates "virtual assets" into the scope of assets and operations that the UIAF must analyze to prevent money laundering and terrorism financing. It empowers the UIAF to establish reporting requirements for entities involved in operations with virtual assets.
Resolución 314 de 2021 de la UIAF: Por la cual se imparten instrucciones relacionadas con el SARLAFT a los proveedores de servicios de activos virtuales.
Risk-Based Approach: VASPs must implement a risk-based approach to CDD. This means applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons - PEPs, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, complex corporate structures, high-value transactions, or unusual transaction patterns) and simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower-risk customers.
Identification and Verification of Customers:
Identification and verification of beneficial owners (typically individuals holding 25% or more of the company's shares or voting rights, or exercising control through other means).
Report suspicious transactions (SARs) to the UIAF.
UN Sanctions: As a member state of the United Nations, Colombia is legally obligated to implement sanctions imposed by the UN Security Council. UIAF Resolution 314/2021 directly references adherence to UN Security Council resolutions as a core component of ML/TF risk management. This includes asset freezes and other restrictions against listed individuals and entities.
Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Colombia.
They are not regulated by the SFC as financial products or securities, unless they exhibit characteristics that make them fall under existing definitions (e.g., a security token).
No specific "crypto custody license" currently exists in Colombia.
The "La Arenera" Regulatory Sandbox: This is the closest Colombia has to a structured approach for crypto firms.
Decree 1234 of 2020 established the framework for innovative projects in financial technologies (FinTech) within a regulatory sandbox (known as "La Arenera").
Decreto 1234 de 2020 (Ministerio de Hacienda y Crédito Público): https://www.funcionpublica.gov.co/eva/gestornormativo/norma.php?i=141870
Separation: Client assets must be clearly segregated from the firm's own assets to protect clients in case of firm insolvency.
No specific insurance or bonding requirements for crypto custody.
No specific legal mandates for cold storage of crypto assets.
Entity Targeted: OmegaPro Group (an international alleged Ponzi scheme), its local promoters, influencers, and related entities operating in Colombia (e.g., Bux Corp, Smart Business Corp). Violation Type: Unregistered and unauthorized financial intermediation, operating a multi-level marketing scheme that promised high returns without proper backing, misleading advertising, consumer fraud, and alleged pyramid scheme. Outcome: SIC ordered the cessation of all promotion and operations of OmegaPro-related schemes in Colombia, imposed significant fines, and mandated restitution to affected consumers. The Fiscalía has pursued criminal charges, leading to arrests of key promoters and the freezing of assets. Many victims have lost significant sums, and the full extent of recovery is uncertain.
Entity Targeted: Daily Cop S.A.S. and its founders/promoters (e.g., Camilo Andrés Suárez Aldana, David Mateo Suárez Aldana). Violation Type: Alleged pyramid scheme, unauthorized and illegal financial intermediation using cryptocurrencies as a front, offering unrealistic returns, consumer fraud. Outcome: SIC issued a definitive resolution ordering the immediate cessation of Daily Cop's activities, imposing fines, and requiring restitution. The Fiscalía subsequently arrested key figures behind the scheme and initiated criminal proceedings, uncovering millions of dollars in alleged fraud.
Entity Targeted: Local promoters and affiliates of the international Generación Zoe scheme operating in Colombia. Violation Type: Alleged illegal financial intermediation, fraud, and operating a Ponzi/pyramid scheme under the guise of coaching and crypto investments. Penalty Amount: Arrests and criminal charges against Colombian operators. Assets linked to the scheme were seized. Outcome: Colombian authorities, working with international counterparts, arrested individuals linked to Generación Zoe's operations in the country. Criminal proceedings are ongoing for charges related to aggravated fraud and illegal financial intermediation. Outcome: Provided valuable insights for future regulation, demonstrating a willingness by the SFC to study and understand crypto operations under controlled conditions.
Outcome: SIC ordered the cessation of all promotion and operations of OmegaPro-related schemes in Colombia, imposed significant fines, and mandated restitution to affected consumers. The Fiscalía has pursued criminal charges, leading to arrests of key promoters and the freezing of assets. Many victims have lost significant sums, and the full extent of recovery is uncertain.
Outcome: SIC issued a definitive resolution ordering the immediate cessation of Daily Cop's activities, imposing fines, and requiring restitution. The Fiscalía subsequently arrested key figures behind the scheme and initiated criminal proceedings, uncovering millions of dollars in alleged fraud.
Outcome: Colombian authorities, working with international counterparts, arrested individuals linked to Generación Zoe's operations in the country. Criminal proceedings are ongoing for charges related to aggravated fraud and illegal financial intermediation.
SIC: Imposed fines of over COP $500 million (approx. USD $125,000 at the time) against the company and its managers, ordered the immediate cessation of its operations, and mandated the return of funds to investors.
SIC: Fines in the hundreds of millions of Colombian Pesos (COP) against promoters and entities. For instance, in August 2022, the SIC sanctioned "Smart Business Corp SAS," "Bux Corp SAS," and several individuals involved with OmegaPro, imposing fines totaling over COP $2.400 million (approx. USD $600,000 at the time) and ordering the immediate cessation of activities and restitution to affected consumers. Further fines and orders against other promoters followed.
Ongoing Development: Ley 2143 of 2021 mandated the SFC to propose a comprehensive regulatory framework for crypto assets, indicating a future move towards a more formal licensing system.
Regulatory Sandbox (La Arenera): The closest mechanism for innovation is the SFC's La Arenera, a regulatory sandbox established under Circular Externa 021 de 2023. This allows financial entities (and in certain cases, non-supervised entities in partnership with supervised ones) to test innovative financial services, including those involving crypto assets, under a controlled environment with temporary waivers or specific authorizations. However, participating in La Arenera does not exempt a token from being classified as a security; rather, it allows for a structured dialogue and potential adaptation of regulations if a security token is being tested.
FATF Recommendations: As a country committed to international AML/CFT standards, Colombia aligns its regulations with the FATF Recommendations. Recommendation 15 specifically targets new technologies, including virtual assets and VASPs, requiring them to be regulated for AML/CFT purposes, licensed or registered, and subject to effective systems for monitoring and ensuring compliance.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a non-resident VASP may serve Colombian residents from abroad only if it registers with the UIAF for AML/CFT obligations (mandatory for all VASPs); if it seeks fiat on/off-ramps through Colombian banks, it must enter the SFC's La Arenera sandbox with a regulated partner; operating without any registration or sandbox participation carries high enforcement risk as demonstrated by SIC fines and Fiscalía criminal prosecutions against unregistered operators.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- May a non-resident provider serve residents from abroad?
- Does cross-border service trigger licensing, registration, or AML obligations?
- What enforcement risk exists for unlicensed remote operators?