← Regulations / Costa Rica / Operating Models / CEX

Centralized exchange in Costa Rica

Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

CEX is conditionally permitted in Costa Rica with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration as an 'obligated subject' with SUGEF (or potentially the UIF) under Law 7786 as amended by Law No. 10.363 — registration framework governed by SUGEF Circular 001-2022 and SUGEF 2-2024 (the implementing regulation for VASPs).
  • Full AML/CFT program implementation: KYC, CDD, EDD, transaction monitoring policies and procedures.
  • Appointment of a designated AML Compliance Officer.
  • Obligation to report suspicious transactions (SARs/STRs) to the Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas (UIAD) — Costa Rica's FIU.
  • Ongoing due diligence: regular transaction monitoring, keeping customer data up-to-date, periodic risk categorization reviews.
  • Risk-based approach (RBA): must apply enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers (e.g., PEPs, cross-border relationships).
  • Travel-rule compliance under SUGEF Circular 001-2022 Art. 24-25: collect, transmit, and store originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers of USD $1,000 or more.
  • Record-keeping: maintain transaction and client records per electronic invoicing and monthly reporting obligations to the General Directorate of Taxation.
  • Conduct a comprehensive money laundering risk assessment.
  • Employee training on AML/CFT policies and procedures.

Key Restrictions

  • Virtual assets are not legal tender in Costa Rica (BCCR position) and are not regulated as financial products by SUGEF unless they fall under existing regulated activities.
  • No specific VASP license exists — operators must operate under the 'obligated subject' AML/CFT registration framework; the proposed Expediente 22.837 (which would codify VASP classification) remains pending with procedural setbacks.
  • If processing fiat currency payments, operator would fall under existing payment service provider regulations and potentially require additional SUGEF licenses.
  • Local incorporation and local registered office/legal representative are required as a matter of general Costa Rican corporate law.
  • Capital requirements are ambiguous: no specific minimum capital for crypto operators, but if activities are interpreted as financial institution activities (e.g., holding client fiat), traditional capital requirements may apply.
  • No-tipping-off prohibition: VASPs cannot disclose to customers that an STR has been filed.
  • For transfers to/from unhosted wallets, VASP can collect/retain originator info from its own customer but cannot transmit information to an unhosted wallet directly.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: VASPs are not yet explicitly classified as 'obligated subjects' under Law 7786 — the pending Expediente 22.837 faces procedural setbacks, creating legal uncertainty.
  • Enforcement risk: SUGEF and BCCR have issued multiple warnings (Circular SGF-0036-2021, January 2022 communiques) that virtual assets are unregulated, and SUGEF may take action against unregistered entities.
  • Capital requirement uncertainty: no prescribed minimum capital for crypto-only operators, but existing financial institution capital thresholds could apply if fiat is involved — creates structuring risk.
  • Criminal exposure: OIJ investigates crypto-related money laundering and fraud; assets including cryptocurrencies may be seized in criminal proceedings.
  • Tax/PR exposure: monthly electronic invoicing and reporting to the General Directorate of Taxation creates disclosure obligations that could increase scrutiny.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 85% confidence

Virtual asset service providers in Costa Rica are not yet explicitly classified as 'obligated subjects' under Law 7786; the proposed amendment (Expediente 22.837) that would explicitly include them remains pending and has faced procedural setbacks.

licensing 90% confidence

Registration: With SUGEF as an "obligated subject" (if the activity falls under their scope) or potentially with the Financial Intelligence Unit (Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera - UIF) depending on the exact classification.

licensing 90% confidence

Full AML/KYC Program: Implementation of robust Know Your Customer (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), and Transaction Monitoring policies and procedures.

licensing 100% confidence

Reporting: Obligation to report suspicious transactions (SARs/STRs) to the UIF.

licensing 90% confidence

Maintenance of transaction and client records for a specified period is now predominantly governed by electronic invoicing systems and specific monthly reporting obligations to the General Directorate of Taxation, fundamentally altering the methods and specific requirements for record-keeping in Costa Rica.

licensing 70% confidence

Capital Requirements: There are no specific capital requirements for crypto-specific licenses as such licenses don't exist. However:

licensing 60% confidence

If an entity's operations are interpreted as falling under the scope of existing financial institution activities (e.g., holding client funds, providing certain payment services in fiat), then the capital requirements applicable to traditional financial institutions or payment service providers regulated by SUGEF would apply. These can vary significantly depending on the type of financial service.

licensing 80% confidence

Local Presence: Generally, any company operating and generating income in Costa Rica needs to be incorporated locally and have a local registered office and local representation (e.g., a local legal representative). This is standard corporate law, not crypto-specific. For AML purposes, having a local AML officer is also typical.

aml 100% confidence

Law No. 10.363, "Law on the Regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers" (Ley de Regulación de Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales). This law established the legal framework for VASPs, bringing them under Law 7786's AML/CFT scope. However, the operational AML/CFT obligations and registration mandate became enforceable only after SUGEF's implementing regulation (SUGEF 2-2024) came into effect on November 16, 2024.

aml 100% confidence

Regulations issued by SUGEF: While Law 10.363 sets the legal framework, the Superintendent General of Financial Entities (SUGEF) is responsible for developing specific regulations. The key implementing regulation, SUGEF 2-2024 ("Reglamento para la Inscripción y Supervisión de los Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales"), was issued and became effective on November 16, 2024. It details registration, CDD, transaction monitoring, STR, and record-keeping requirements for VASPs.

aml 100% confidence

Identification and Verification of Customer Identity:

aml 100% confidence

Ongoing Due Diligence:

aml 100% confidence

Risk-Based Approach (RBA): VASPs must apply CDD measures on a risk-sensitive basis. This means applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers, transactions, or business relationships (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), cross-border correspondent relationships, complex/unusual transactions). Simplified due diligence (SDD) may be applied in specific lower-risk scenarios.

aml 100% confidence

Trigger: Any transaction, attempted transaction, or activity where the VASP suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that the funds or assets are proceeds of criminal activity (including money laundering) or are related to terrorist financing.

aml 100% confidence

Reporting Body: The report must be submitted to the Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas (UIAD), which is Costa Rica's FIU.

aml 40% confidence

No Tipping Off: VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR has been, or will be, filed.

travel-rule 60% confidence

SUGEF Circular 001-2022 "Reglamento para la Inscripción y Supervisión de los Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales" (Regulation for the Registration and Supervision of Virtual Asset Service Providers). This circular directly addresses the registration and AML/CFT obligations of VASPs, including requirements for information sharing consistent with the Travel Rule. It was published in La Gaceta, the official Costa Rican government gazette.

travel-rule 95% confidence

Collection of Information (Art. 24): VASPs must obtain and maintain information on the originator and beneficiary for all virtual asset transfers equal to or greater than USD $1,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies or virtual assets), regardless of whether the other party is another VASP or an unhosted wallet. For transfers below this amount, only basic information (e.g., name of the client) is typically required.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Transmission of Information (Art. 25): For virtual asset transfers equal to or greater than USD $1,000 (or its equivalent in other currencies or virtual assets) to another regulated VASP, the sending VASP must securely transmit the required originator and beneficiary information to the receiving VASP.

travel-rule 60% confidence

For transfers to or from unhosted wallets, the VASP is responsible for collecting and retaining the information from its own customer, but cannot transmit information to an unhosted wallet directly.

travel-rule 90% confidence

Monetary fines: Proportional to the severity of the infringement and the VASP's size and revenue.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Revocation of registration: Permanent loss of authorization to operate as a PSAV.

enforcement 100% confidence

Regulator Name: Superintendencia General de Entidades Financieras (SUGEF)

enforcement 90% confidence

September 2021: SUGEF Circular SGF-0036-2021 reiterates that virtual assets are not legal tender and are not regulated by SUGEF unless they fall under existing regulated activities.

enforcement 80% confidence

January 2022: SUGEF continues to issue warnings regarding the risks of virtual assets.

enforcement 100% confidence

Outcome: SUGEF maintains that virtual assets are not regulated financial products or services under its supervision. Financial institutions are advised to exercise extreme caution when dealing with virtual assets and to ensure compliance with existing AML/CFT regulations if handling any related transactions. This means that if a bank facilitates transactions involving crypto, it must still comply with its existing AML obligations.

enforcement 100% confidence

Regulator Name: Banco Central de Costa Rica (BCCR)

enforcement 90% confidence

November 2021: BCCR reiterates that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Costa Rica and highlights risks associated with their use.

enforcement 90% confidence

Example (illustrative, not specific to last 3 years due to public data scarcity): News reports over the years have documented OIJ investigations into cybercrime and fraud where victims sent crypto to scammers, or where crypto was used to move illicit funds.

enforcement 90% confidence

Outcome: Arrests, ongoing investigations, legal proceedings, and potential convictions for individuals involved in criminal activities. Assets, including cryptocurrencies, may be seized.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a centralized exchange (custodial VASP) may operate in Costa Rica only by registering as an 'obligated subject' under Law 7786 (as amended by Law 10.363) with SUGEF, implementing a full AML/CFT program, and complying with the travel rule for transfers ≥ USD $1,000, but faces regulatory ambiguity because VASPs are not yet explicitly classified under Law 7786 and the dedicated VASP bill (Expediente 22.837) remains pending.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What exchange / VASP license applies?
  • What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
  • What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
  • What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?