← Regulations / Costa Rica / Operating Models / Stablecoin issuer

Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Costa Rica

Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Costa Rica with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Law No. 7786 (Narcotics, Psychotropic Substances, Drugs of Unauthorized Use, Related Activities, Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism) applies — VASPs including stablecoin issuers are obligated subjects under Law 10.363 but operational AML rules under SUGEF 2-2024 have faced procedural setbacks and are not fully in force.
  • Full AML/KYC program required: customer identification and verification (KYC), ongoing monitoring, risk assessment and management, internal controls, employee training, designation of a compliance officer.
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for high-risk clients including PEPs; source of funds/wealth verification required as part of EDD.
  • Identification of Beneficial Owners (BOs) — VASPs must identify all natural persons owning 25% or more of shares/voting rights or otherwise controlling the entity.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) must be filed with the Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas (UIAD - Costa Rica's FIU) for any transaction or attempted transaction where funds are suspected to be proceeds of crime.
  • No tipping-off prohibition — VASPs and employees cannot disclose to customers or third parties that an STR has been or will be filed.
  • Records of transactions and client data must be maintained; reporting obligations to the General Directorate of Taxation apply via electronic invoicing systems.
  • Risk-based approach (RBA) required — CDD measures applied on a risk-sensitive basis with enhanced due diligence for higher-risk relationships.

Key Restrictions

  • No specific e-money or banking license framework exists for stablecoin issuance in Costa Rica — this operating model falls into a regulatory gap as 'virtual asset service provider' under Law 10.363, but the implementing regulation (SUGEF 2-2024) has faced procedural setbacks and is not fully operational.
  • Local incorporation and a local registered office and legal representative are required for any company operating and generating income in Costa Rica (general corporate law).
  • If the stablecoin issuer handles fiat currency payments (e.g., accepting fiat for issuance, redeeming to fiat), they fall under existing payment service provider regulations in addition to AML/CFT obligations.
  • No specific reserve composition, segregation, or audit rules exist for stablecoin issuers in Costa Rica — there is no bespoke stablecoin regulatory framework.
  • If the issuer's operations are interpreted as falling under existing financial institution activities (e.g., holding client funds), traditional financial institution capital requirements from SUGEF may apply.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: Law 10.363 classifies VASPs as obligated subjects but the operational AML registration and supervision framework (SUGEF 2-2024) is not yet in force; operators face uncertainty on how to register and what specifically is required.
  • Enforcement risk: Operating without clear licensing could attract regulatory scrutiny from SUGEF if the activity is re-interpreted as unlicensed financial intermediation.
  • No specific reserve, audit, or redemption framework for stablecoins — no legal clarity on segregation of reserve assets, composition requirements (e.g., 1:1 backing), or holder redemption rights.
  • Foreign-issued stablecoins (e.g., USDC, USDT) have no explicit prohibition but also no permissive framework; their legal status for use in Costa Rica is ambiguous.
  • Tax treatment uncertainty: capital gains (15%), income tax (progressive up to 25% individuals, 10-30% businesses), and VAT on related services apply, but no crypto-specific tax reporting guidelines exist — proper record-keeping is essential.
  • If the stablecoin issuer is deemed to conduct financial intermediation without proper authorization, significant penalties under Law 7786 and SUGEF regulations could apply.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 90% confidence

Superintendencia General de Entidades Financieras (SUGEF): The General Superintendency of Financial Institutions. SUGEF is responsible for supervising financial entities and enforcing AML/CFT regulations for many obligated subjects.

licensing 85% confidence

Virtual asset service providers in Costa Rica are not yet explicitly classified as 'obligated subjects' under Law 7786; the proposed amendment (Expediente 22.837) that would explicitly include them remains pending and has faced procedural setbacks.

licensing 90% confidence

Registration: With SUGEF as an "obligated subject" (if the activity falls under their scope) or potentially with the Financial Intelligence Unit (Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera - UIF) depending on the exact classification.

licensing 90% confidence

Full AML/KYC Program: Implementation of robust Know Your Customer (KYC), Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), and Transaction Monitoring policies and procedures.

licensing 100% confidence

Reporting: Obligation to report suspicious transactions (SARs/STRs) to the UIF.

licensing 90% confidence

Maintenance of transaction and client records for a specified period is now predominantly governed by electronic invoicing systems and specific monthly reporting obligations to the General Directorate of Taxation, fundamentally altering the methods and specific requirements for record-keeping in Costa Rica.

licensing 60% confidence

If processing fiat currency payments (even if crypto-related): They would likely fall under existing payment service provider regulations and certainly under AML/CFT laws as obligated subjects.

licensing 70% confidence

Capital Requirements: There are no specific capital requirements for crypto-specific licenses as such licenses don't exist. However:

licensing 60% confidence

If an entity's operations are interpreted as falling under the scope of existing financial institution activities (e.g., holding client funds, providing certain payment services in fiat), then the capital requirements applicable to traditional financial institutions or payment service providers regulated by SUGEF would apply. These can vary significantly depending on the type of financial service.

licensing 60% confidence

For entities purely operating as "obligated subjects" under AML without being a licensed financial institution, there isn't a direct prescribed minimum capital, but demonstrating financial soundness and having adequate resources to implement AML controls is implicitly expected.

licensing 80% confidence

Local Presence: Generally, any company operating and generating income in Costa Rica needs to be incorporated locally and have a local registered office and local representation (e.g., a local legal representative). This is standard corporate law, not crypto-specific. For AML purposes, having a local AML officer is also typical.

aml 100% confidence

Law No. 7786, "Law on Narcotics, Psychotropic Substances, Drugs of Unauthorized Use, Related Activities, Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism" (Ley sobre Estupefacientes, Sustancias Psicotrópicas, Drogas de Uso No Autorizado, Actividades Conexas, Legitimación de Capitales y Financiamiento al Terrorismo), as amended. This is Costa Rica's foundational AML/CFT law.

aml 100% confidence

Law No. 10.363, "Law on the Regulation of Virtual Asset Service Providers" (Ley de Regulación de Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales). This law established the legal framework for VASPs, bringing them under Law 7786's AML/CFT scope. However, the operational AML/CFT obligations and registration mandate became enforceable only after SUGEF's implementing regulation (SUGEF 2-2024) came into effect on November 16, 2024.

aml 100% confidence

Regulations issued by SUGEF: While Law 10.363 sets the legal framework, the Superintendent General of Financial Entities (SUGEF) is responsible for developing specific regulations. The key implementing regulation, SUGEF 2-2024 ("Reglamento para la Inscripción y Supervisión de los Proveedores de Servicios de Activos Virtuales"), was issued and became effective on November 16, 2024. It details registration, CDD, transaction monitoring, STR, and record-keeping requirements for VASPs.

aml 100% confidence

Identification and Verification of Customer Identity:

aml 100% confidence

Source of funds/wealth (as part of Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients, which may include scrutiny of large transactions as a contributing factor to the risk assessment).

aml 100% confidence

Identification of Beneficial Owners (BOs): VASPs must identify and verify the identity of all natural persons who ultimately own or control the legal entity (typically those holding 25% or more of shares or voting rights, or otherwise exercising control).

aml 100% confidence

Ongoing Due Diligence:

aml 100% confidence

Risk-Based Approach (RBA): VASPs must apply CDD measures on a risk-sensitive basis. This means applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers, transactions, or business relationships (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), cross-border correspondent relationships, complex/unusual transactions). Simplified due diligence (SDD) may be applied in specific lower-risk scenarios.

aml 100% confidence

Trigger: Any transaction, attempted transaction, or activity where the VASP suspects or has reasonable grounds to suspect that the funds or assets are proceeds of criminal activity (including money laundering) or are related to terrorist financing.

aml 100% confidence

Reporting Body: The report must be submitted to the Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Instituto Costarricense sobre Drogas (UIAD), which is Costa Rica's FIU.

aml 40% confidence

No Tipping Off: VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR has been, or will be, filed.

tax 90% confidence

If cryptocurrencies are considered movable assets or intangible goods for tax purposes in Costa Rica, capital gains tax may apply, but the specific treatment and determination of taxable gains must be derived from detailed local frameworks that account for all sources of income (including salary, dividends, and crypto) as they are continuously refined by regulatory authorities.

tax 90% confidence

Rate: The standard capital gains tax rate in Costa Rica is 15%. This applies to gains realized from the sale of shares, real estate, and other movable assets, provided it is not part of a habitual commercial activity.

tax 95% confidence

General Principle: Costa Rica's Value Added Tax (VAT), known as Impuesto al Valor Agregado (IVA), applies to the supply of goods and services within the national territory. The standard rate is 13%.

tax 100% confidence

No Crypto-Specific Reporting: There are currently no specific tax reporting requirements unique to cryptocurrencies in Costa Rica.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
low

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — stablecoin issuance in Costa Rica lacks a dedicated legal framework; operators must incorporate locally, register as VASPs under Law 10.363/SUGEF (though implementing regulations are not yet fully in force), comply with general AML/CFT obligations under Law 7786, and face significant regulatory ambiguity on reserve, redemption, and licensing requirements.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
  • What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
  • What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
  • Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?