← Regulations / Cuba / Operating Models / CEX

Centralized exchange in Cuba

Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

CEX is conditionally permitted in Cuba with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD) required per Resolution 215/2021 — full legal name, date of birth, address, nationality, identity number, occupation for individuals; legal name, form, address, directors, beneficial owners for entities
  • Risk-Based Approach (RBA) mandated — intensity of CDD must match ML/TF risk profile
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for higher-risk categories (non-resident customers, PEPs, complex transactions, correspondent relationships)
  • Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and transactions for consistency with customer risk profile and source of funds
  • General AML/CFT obligations under Ley No. 143/2021 (Law 143/2021) — Ley de Prevención y Confrontación del Lavado de Activos, el Financiamiento al Terrorismo y a la Proliferación de Armas de Destrucción Masiva
  • No explicit FATF Travel Rule adopted — no defined threshold for originator/beneficiary information transmission on VA transfers
  • Compliance supervised by Banco Central de Cuba (BCC) with penalties including license revocation and criminal charges for ML/TF

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain a prior license from the Banco Central de Cuba (BCC) under Resolution 215/2021 and Resolution 216/2021
  • Only virtual assets explicitly authorized by the BCC may be used — unauthorized virtual assets are prohibited
  • Only 10 state-owned and mixed-enterprise firms have been granted licenses to date, effectively excluding purely private remote operators
  • No explicit crypto-specific custody segregation rules — only general banking principles of separation may apply for authorized financial institutions
  • No explicit cold-storage or insurance/bonding requirements for custodial assets
  • Entity must be a legal person (incorporated entity) in Cuba to apply for a VASP license

Key Risks

  • Extremely limited licensing — only state-owned and mixed enterprises have received licenses; private operators face de facto exclusion
  • Lack of transparency in enforcement actions — Cuban government does not publicly disclose enforcement against private entities
  • BCC has unilateral authority to freeze accounts without notice and suspend card transactions under expanded enforcement powers
  • No explicit Travel Rule framework creates regulatory ambiguity for cross-border transfers
  • US sanctions exposure — operating out of Cuba for a centralized exchange may trigger OFAC sanctions risk for the operator and counterparties
  • No crypto-specific custody segregation rules create asset-protection risk for customer funds

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 100% confidence

Resolución No. 215/2021 del Banco Central de Cuba (BCC)

licensing 100% confidence

Resolución No. 216/2021 del Banco Central de Cuba (BCC)

licensing 100% confidence

Overview: This is the cornerstone regulation specifically for virtual assets. It establishes the rules for the use of certain virtual assets in commercial transactions, their licensing, and supervision in Cuba. It defines virtual assets and virtual asset service providers (VASPs). It explicitly states that the BCC will grant licenses to VASPs that operate in Cuba. It also emphasizes that operations with virtual assets must comply with AML/CFT rules.

licensing 100% confidence

Legalizes the use of virtual assets for financial transactions between individuals and legal entities, but only those authorized by the BCC.

licensing 100% confidence

Requires service providers dealing with virtual assets to obtain a license from the BCC.

licensing 100% confidence

Prohibits the use of virtual assets that are not authorized by the BCC.

licensing 100% confidence

Stresses compliance with AML/CFT regulations.

licensing 60% confidence

Identification and Verification:

licensing 85% confidence

Obtain and verify the identity of the customer and, where applicable, the beneficial owner. This includes:

licensing 85% confidence

For Individuals: Full legal name, date of birth, address, nationality, national identity number (e.g., ID card, passport), and occupation. Verification must be from reliable, independent sources (e.g., official documents).

licensing 60% confidence

For Legal Entities: Legal name, legal form, address of the registered office, names of directors/senior management, beneficial owners, and proof of existence (e.g., articles of incorporation, business registration certificate).

licensing 90% confidence

Purpose and Nature of the Business Relationship: Understand the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or transaction.

licensing 90% confidence

Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions undertaken by customers to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including the source of funds.

licensing 90% confidence

Risk-Based Approach (RBA): Implement a risk-based approach, meaning that the intensity of CDD measures should be commensurate with the level of ML/TF risk identified.

licensing 90% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Must be applied for higher-risk categories, such as:

custody 40% confidence

Resolution 215/2021 regulates the use of virtual assets in Cuba. It defines virtual assets and states that their use for transactions between natural and legal persons is authorized by the BCC, provided they are issued by central banks or monetary authorities, or otherwise explicitly approved by the BCC. It also explicitly prohibits the use of virtual assets issued by private entities without prior authorization from the BCC. Entities operating with virtual assets must obtain a license from the BCC.

custody 85% confidence

Resolution 216/2021 initially authorized financial institutions to use virtual assets under BCC supervision with prior authorization, but subsequent implementation has moved to a concrete licensed framework where only 10 state-owned and mixed-enterprise firms have been granted licenses, excluding regular banks and non-bank financial institutions, and accompanied by new restrictive conditions including unilateral account freezing powers.

custody 85% confidence

Cuba does not have a distinct "crypto custodial license" in the sense of a specialized license solely for custody services.

custody 100% confidence

However, Resolution 215/2021 mandates that any legal person (entity) operating with virtual assets (which would include providing custody-like services) must obtain prior authorization from the Banco Central de Cuba.

custody 95% confidence

There are no explicit crypto-specific rules mandating the segregation of client virtual assets from the operating assets of the custodian or the personal assets of the entity in the Cuban regulations (Resolution 215/216).

custody 95% confidence

There are no explicit crypto-specific rules mandating the segregation of client virtual assets from the operating assets of the custodian or the personal assets of the entity in the Cuban regulations (Resolution 215/216).

custody 100% confidence

There are no explicit mandates or requirements for cold storage (offline storage of private keys) in the Cuban regulations.

travel-rule 60% confidence

No, not the specific FATF Travel Rule. Cuba's primary regulation, Resolution 215/2021 from the Banco Central de Cuba (BCC), focuses on authorizing, licensing, and supervising VASPs within Cuba and requiring them to implement general AML/CFT measures. It mandates a risk-based approach, customer due diligence, and reporting of suspicious transactions. However, it does not explicitly detail the requirement to collect and transmit originator and beneficiary information for all VA transfers above a certain threshold, which is the core of the Travel Rule.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Since the specific FATF Travel Rule is not explicitly adopted, there are no defined threshold amounts for the collection and transmission of originator and beneficiary information on VA transfers.

travel-rule 100% confidence

Resolution 215/2021 covers any legal entity operating in Cuba that intends to provide virtual asset services to the public or other entities. These services include, but are not limited to:

enforcement 90% confidence

Lack of Transparency: The Cuban government is not known for its transparency regarding internal enforcement actions, especially against individuals or smaller, private entities.

enforcement 100% confidence

Central Bank of Cuba (BCC) holds expanded enforcement powers, including unilateral authority to freeze bank accounts without notice and suspend Visa and Mastercard transactions.

enforcement 95% confidence

Focus on Regulation: Cuba's primary public actions concerning crypto have been the creation of a legal framework to regulate virtual assets, aiming to harness them for economic benefit (e.g., bypassing US sanctions, facilitating remittances) while simultaneously controlling their use to prevent illicit activities and maintain state oversight.

enforcement 85% confidence

Nature of the Economy: In a state-controlled economy, significant independent financial operations (like an unregistered crypto exchange) would likely be shut down or absorbed without a public trial or detailed announcement.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a centralized exchange can operate in Cuba only as a state-owned or mixed-enterprise entity licensed by the Banco Central de Cuba under Resolutions 215/2021 and 216/2021, but purely private operators are effectively barred as only 10 such licenses have been granted to state/mixed firms, and the framework lacks FATF Travel Rule adoption, explicit custody segregation rules, and transparent enforcement.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What exchange / VASP license applies?
  • What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
  • What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
  • What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?