← Regulations / Cabo Verde / Operating Models / Crypto ATM

Crypto ATM / kiosk operator in Cabo Verde

Physical kiosks that exchange cash for crypto (and sometimes vice versa). High-cash AML risk profile.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Crypto ATM is conditionally permitted in Cabo Verde with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • CDD/KYC: Identify and verify identity of customers (name, address, date of birth, national ID/passport) per Lei n.º 1/IX/2021, de 16 de março (AML/CFT Law) which defines VASPs as reporting entities.
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Required for higher-risk customers/transactions — PEPs, customers from high-risk jurisdictions (FATF-listed), complex/unusually large transactions, transactions involving new technologies favoring anonymity.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Immediately report any suspected ML/TF/PF transaction (including attempts) to the Unidade de Informação Financeira (UIF), regardless of amount, without delay.
  • Record-keeping: Maintain customer identification data and transaction records for at least 5 years after end of business relationship or date of occasional transaction.
  • Risk Assessments: Conduct thorough ML/TF risk assessments covering business operations, customers, products, and services.
  • Internal Controls: Appoint an AML compliance officer, establish internal policies/procedures/controls, and conduct staff training.
  • No Tipping-Off: Prohibit disclosure to customer or third parties that an STR is being made or an AML investigation is underway.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitor business relationships and transactions for consistency with customer risk profile.

Key Restrictions

  • No dedicated crypto/kiosk-specific licensing regime exists — BCV has stated it does not authorize, supervise, or license entities dealing exclusively with virtual assets.
  • Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Cabo Verde; the BCV has issued repeated public warnings against cryptocurrency use.
  • Any fiat-cash handling (cash in/out) could trigger traditional financial-services licensing requirements from BCV if the activity constitutes remittance or payment processing of fiat currency — the line is uncertain.
  • The operator must comply with general company registration laws in Cabo Verde to operate a business.
  • No specific kiosk/money-transmitter license framework exists; the operator must rely on the general VASP AML/CFT obligations under Lei n.º 1/IX/2021.

Key Risks

  • High regulatory ambiguity: BCV does not license crypto VASPs, yet AML/CFT law defines VASPs (including crypto ATM operators) as reporting entities with obligations — enforcement posture is untested.
  • Cash-intensive crypto ATM model carries elevated AML risk; no explicit cash-transaction reporting threshold (e.g., over certain amounts) has been published for crypto kiosks, creating compliance uncertainty.
  • BCV has a track record of issuing public warnings and interventions (e.g., OPTCOIN case) — potential for sudden enforcement action or shutdown.
  • General criminal law exposure: fraud involving crypto kiosks would be handled by police/judiciary under nascent legal frameworks.
  • No clear path to a license means operators face legal uncertainty on whether the model is legally viable, even if AML-compliant.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 100% confidence

Banco de Cabo Verde (BCV) Stance:

licensing 85% confidence

The Banco de Cabo Verde (BCV), the central bank, has repeatedly issued public warnings regarding the risks associated with cryptocurrencies.

licensing 95% confidence

It has clarified that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Cabo Verde.

licensing 85% confidence

The BCV has stated it does not authorize, supervise, or license entities that deal exclusively with virtual assets, but it has actively issued public warnings and interventions (e.g., regarding OPTCOIN), indicating some regulatory oversight through public communications and evolving legal frameworks for digital currency.

licensing 95% confidence

Lack of Dedicated Licensing Regime:

licensing 95% confidence

There are no specific laws or regulations that define a licensing framework for crypto exchanges, custody providers, or payment processors as distinct categories of financial institutions.

licensing 95% confidence

Neither a specific licensing nor a dedicated registration regime for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) exists in Cabo Verde.

licensing 90% confidence

Entities wishing to operate a business (including a crypto-related one) would need to comply with general company registration laws in Cabo Verde, but this is distinct from obtaining a financial services license.

licensing 95% confidence

If a company were to deal with fiat currency in a way that constitutes a traditional financial service (e.g., remittances, payment processing of traditional money), then those specific activities would fall under the BCV's existing licensing requirements for financial institutions, which are separate from crypto activities.

licensing 95% confidence

Cabo Verde has updated its AML/CFT laws to align with FATF recommendations, which include virtual assets and VASPs.

licensing 95% confidence

The Financial Intelligence Unit (Unidade de Informação Financeira - UIF) is the national authority responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports.

licensing 95% confidence

Key Law: Lei n.º 1/IX/2021, de 16 de março, on the Prevention and Combat of Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism, explicitly defines "Ativo Virtual" (Virtual Asset) and "Prestador de Serviços de Ativos Virtuais" (Virtual Asset Service Provider) and subjects them to AML/CFT obligations.

licensing 60% confidence

Specific AML/CFT Requirements for VASPs (as "Reporting Entities"):

licensing 95% confidence

Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Implementing robust KYC procedures to identify and verify the identity of customers, including beneficial owners. This means collecting name, address, date of birth, national ID, etc.

licensing 95% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): For higher-risk customers or transactions.

licensing 95% confidence

Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data and transaction details for a specified period (typically 5-7 years).

licensing 95% confidence

Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions or activities to the UIF without delay.

licensing 95% confidence

Risk Assessments: Conducting a thorough assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risks associated with their business operations, customers, products, and services.

licensing 95% confidence

Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining appropriate internal policies, procedures, and controls to mitigate ML/TF risks, including the appointment of an AML compliance officer and staff training.

aml 90% confidence

Identification and Verification:

aml 95% confidence

Individuals: Obtain and verify identity using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information (e.g., full name, date of birth, nationality, physical address, unique identification number like a passport or national ID).

aml 90% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Required for higher-risk customers or transactions, including:

aml 90% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs)

aml 85% confidence

Customers from high-risk jurisdictions (as identified by FATF or local authorities)

aml 85% confidence

Complex, unusually large transactions, or unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.

aml 85% confidence

Transactions involving new technologies or products that favor anonymity.

aml 90% confidence

Reporting Obligation: Immediately report any transaction (or attempted transaction), regardless of the amount, that the VASP suspects to be related to money laundering, terrorist financing, or proliferation financing.

aml 90% confidence

No Tipping-Off: Prohibit the disclosure to the customer or any third party that a suspicious transaction report is being or has been made, or that an AML/CFT investigation is being conducted.

aml 85% confidence

Reporting Timeline: Reports must typically be made as soon as suspicion is formed, without delay.

aml 85% confidence

Transaction Records: All necessary records regarding domestic and international transactions, sufficient to reconstruct individual transactions.

aml 100% confidence

Customer Identification Data: Copies of all identification documents, account files, and business correspondence.

aml 100% confidence

CDD Analysis: Documentation of all analyses undertaken regarding CDD, including the rationale for risk assessments.

aml 100% confidence

Retention Period: Records must be retained for at least five (5) years after the business relationship ends or after the date of an occasional transaction. These records must be readily available to competent authorities upon request.

aml 60% confidence

Unidade de Informação Financeira (UIF) – Financial Intelligence Unit:

enforcement 80% confidence

A common approach from central banks in developing economies is to issue warnings via local press. For example, local news outlets often report on BCV warnings:

enforcement 95% confidence

Issuing warnings to the public about the risks of unregulated virtual assets.

enforcement 30% confidence

Developing a regulatory framework for virtual assets, which is a process that typically precedes widespread enforcement.

enforcement 75% confidence

Any cases of fraud involving cryptocurrencies would likely be handled under general criminal law by the police and judicial system, rather than specific crypto-related enforcement by a financial regulator, especially if dedicated virtual asset laws are still nascent. These types of criminal cases are often not widely reported internationally with the specific details requested.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — Crypto ATM/kiosk operators can operate in Cabo Verde as VASPs subject to AML/CFT obligations under Lei n.º 1/IX/2021 (including CDD/KYC, EDD, STR to UIF, record-keeping), but there is no dedicated kiosk or money-transmitter licensing regime, the BCV does not authorize or license crypto-only entities, and any fiat-cash handling may trigger traditional financial-licensing requirements, creating significant legal uncertainty.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What money-transmitter / kiosk-specific license is required?
  • What cash-transaction reporting thresholds apply?
  • What enhanced-KYC obligations attach to cash-in / cash-out?