← Regulations / France / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in France

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in France with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • CASP authorization under MiCA via AMF — custody is a licensed MiCA activity with EUR 50,000 minimum capital (fr.licensing.custody, fr.licensing.vasp)
  • Mandatory KYC: collect, verify, and store identity documents (e.g., two forms of ID); use of third parties permitted (fr.aml.collect-verify-and-store-identity, fr.aml.amlcft-for-casps-since-december)
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, transactions over €1,000 to self-hosted wallets, and cross-border activities (fr.aml.enhanced-due-diligence-edd-for)
  • Ongoing transaction monitoring, KYB for corporate clients (beneficial ownership), and ML/FT risk assessment systems (fr.aml.ongoing-transaction-monitoring-kyb-for)
  • FATF Travel Rule compliance under MiCA for transfers above reporting thresholds (fr.aml.markets-in-crypto-assets-regulation-mica)
  • Suspicious transaction reporting to TRACFIN (fr.licensing.tracfin-handles-suspicious-transaction-reports)
  • Managers and beneficial owners verified during AMF registration (fr.aml.managers-and-beneficial-owners-verified)
  • DAC8 obligation (effective Jan 1, 2026): CASPs must report user crypto transactions to tax authorities (fr.licensing.dac8-implementation-finance-bill-2025)
  • AML/CFT policies, CDD, and registration obligations under 5AMLD implemented in France since Jan 2020 (fr.aml.eu-fifth-aml-directive-5amld)
  • EU AML Regulation (AMLR) and 6AMLD: risk-based ongoing KYC, aligned with AMLA for cross-border supervision (fr.aml.eu-aml-regulation-amlr-and)

Key Restrictions

  • CASP authorization is required — custody is a licensed MiCA activity; must hold EUR 50,000 minimum capital (fr.licensing.custody)
  • Existing PSAN/DASP holders had to transition to CASP by June 30, 2025 — short transition window (fr.licensing.vasp)
  • Local entity required: must be incorporated in France or another EU member state to obtain CASP authorization under MiCA (fr.licensing.vasp)
  • ACPR prudential supervision applies alongside AMF licensing; possible consolidated supervision (fr.licensing.regulator-acpr, fr.licensing.autorit-de-contrle-prudentiel-et)
  • SaaS operator likely bears direct AML obligations as the CASP-licensed custodian — cannot delegate all AML to white-label clients (fr.aml.amlcft-for-casps-since-december, fr.aml.markets-in-crypto-assets-regulation-mica)

Key Risks

  • Short 6-month transition from PSAN to CASP (deadline June 30, 2025) creates cliff risk for unlicensed operators (fr.licensing.vasp)
  • Allocation of AML obligations between SaaS custody provider and white-label client is not explicitly defined in French law — regulatory uncertainty on who performs CDD
  • MiCA minimum capital requirements (EUR 50,000 for custody) are relatively low for institutional custody, but proof-of-reserves and insurance requirements are still being clarified under MiCA Level 2
  • ACPR/AMF dual supervision may create coordination friction and higher compliance cost (fr.licensing.regulator-amf, fr.licensing.regulator-acpr)
  • No specific segregated-custody or insurance requirements visible in provided facts — operator must assess MiCA Title V custody rules separately

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 80% confidence

AMF — CASP authorization — most experienced EU NCA for crypto. Circle chose France for EU MiCA authorization.

licensing 80% confidence

ACPR — Prudential supervision, AML/CFT

licensing 20% confidence

MiCA Regulation (EU) (2023) — CASP authorization, comprehensive crypto regulation

licensing 20% confidence

PACTE Law (Loi PACTE) (2019) — Prior PSAN/DASP regime — EU's most mature pre-MiCA framework, replaced by MiCA

licensing 20% confidence

VASP: CASP authorization under MiCA via AMF. SHORT 6-month transition (existing PSANs had to apply by June 30, 2025). 3-6 months (AMF is experienced). France positioning as EU crypto hub.

licensing 20% confidence

CUSTODY: CASP authorization — custody is a licensed MiCA activity (EUR 50,000 minimum capital)

licensing 20% confidence

Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF): Primary authority for registering/licensing Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASPs, formerly Digital Asset Service Providers or DASPs), supervising crypto offerings (except stablecoins), and enforcing investor protection, AML, and financial regulations.

licensing 20% confidence

Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (ACPR): Oversees prudential supervision, AML compliance (with AMF), stablecoin issuers (e.g., authorizing Circle France, Schuman Financial, Société Générale Forge), and certain DLT infrastructures.

licensing 20% confidence

TRACFIN: Handles suspicious transaction reports for AML/CFT.

licensing 20% confidence

French adaptations to MiCA: Order (October 15, 2024), Decree (February 21, 2025), Law (April 30, 2025); replaced DASP regime with CASP licensing, integrated electronic money tokens (EMTs), and aligned with EU standards. Over 100 DASPs registered previously.

licensing 20% confidence

DAC8 implementation (Finance Bill 2025, effective January 1, 2026): Requires CASPs and tied providers to report user crypto transactions to tax authorities.

licensing 20% confidence

AML/CFT for CASPs (since December 30, 2024): Mandates KYC, transaction monitoring, and sanctions compliance.

aml 20% confidence

PACTE Law (Loi PACTE, 2019): Introduced mandatory registration for DASPs (e.g., crypto exchanges, custodians, wallet services, crypto-to-crypto platforms) and imposed AML standards.

aml 20% confidence

EU Fifth AML Directive (5AMLD): Implemented in France in January 2020, requiring AML/CFT policies, CDD, and registration for all crypto firms serving French clients.

aml 20% confidence

Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA): Enhances transparency, security, and AML for crypto providers; DASPs must transition to CASP licensing with minimum capital (€125,000–€350,000) and FATF Travel Rule compliance.

aml 20% confidence

EU AML Regulation (AMLR) and Sixth AML Directive (AMLD6): Standardizes KYC as ongoing, risk-based processes across EU, explicitly including CASPs/VASPs; aligns with AMLA for cross-border supervision.

aml 20% confidence

Collect, verify, and store identity documents (e.g., two forms of ID); use third parties permitted.

aml 20% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): For high-risk cases like PEPs, transactions over €1,000 to self-hosted wallets, or cross-border activities.

aml 20% confidence

Ongoing transaction monitoring, KYB for corporate clients (beneficial ownership), and ML/FT risk assessment systems.

aml 20% confidence

Managers and beneficial owners verified during AMF registration.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — Custodial wallet / SaaS is permitted in France as a MiCA CASP-licensed custody service (EUR 50,000 minimum capital), requiring a local entity, AMF authorization, ACPR prudential supervision, and full AML/CFT obligations including KYC, EDD, Travel Rule compliance, and TRACFIN reporting; however, the allocation of AML duties between the SaaS provider and white-label clients is not explicit in the provided facts, and MiCA Level 2 segregation/insurance/proof-of-reserves rules require further investigation.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?