← Regulations / Gibraltar / Operating Models / Remote VASP

Remote VASP serving residents in Gibraltar

Foreign-incorporated entity that offers exchange, custody, or transfer services to residents of a jurisdiction without establishing a local entity or office.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Remote VASP is conditionally permitted in Gibraltar with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Full AML/CFT/CPF obligations under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA), including customer due diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, risk assessments, staff training, and appointment of a compliance officer (MLRO)
  • GFSC AML/CFT/CPF guidance compliance — policies and manuals must be submitted during the licensing application
  • Travel Rule obligations under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (Transfer of Virtual Assets) Regulations 2021 for transfers ≥ €1,000 — originator VASPs must collect and transmit originator and beneficiary information (names, wallet details)
  • Registration of Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) with GFSC
  • Sanctions Act 2019 compliance for counter-proliferation

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain a DLT Provider Licence from GFSC — there is no separate registration-only path for remote VASPs
  • Must maintain 'mind and management' in Gibraltar: local office, local hires (including a manager), and proof of domestic operations
  • Must be incorporated under the Companies Act 2014 (updated 2022) in Gibraltar — no pure remote/cross-border licensing path exists
  • Authorized capital is not fixed but must demonstrate financial stability and resources for substance requirements
  • The DLT provider licence requires demonstrating compliance with 10 principles covering governance, risk management, financial stability, data security, and customer protection

Key Risks

  • Operating without a DLT Provider Licence while serving Gibraltar residents would constitute unlicensed activity, exposing the operator to GFSC enforcement action
  • GFSC mandates physical substance in Gibraltar — a fully remote, non-resident structure is incompatible with licensing requirements
  • No separate 'crypto-only' or lighter registration regime for remote VASPs; the DLT licence is the only pathway and requires incorporation and local presence
  • Enforcement risk for unlicensed cross-border servicing includes potential sanctions, reputational damage, and potential liability under POCA for failure to comply with AML obligations

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 20% confidence

Financial Services Act 2018 – establishes the 10 key principles for DLT business operations

licensing 20% confidence

The DLT Regulations – govern distributed ledger technology providers

licensing 20% confidence

Requirements include physical presence, qualified management, transparent ownership, and annual fees (e.g., £50,000 for exchanges).

licensing 20% confidence

GFSC supervision ensures market integrity, but stablecoin-specific rules (e.g., 1:1 reserves) are absent from sources.

licensing 20% confidence

Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC): The main authority, responsible for licensing, supervising, and enforcing rules on DLT firms, virtual asset service providers (VASPs), crypto exchanges, custody services, and trading platforms. It ensures compliance with international standards like FATF, including customer verification and risk management.

licensing 20% confidence

Financial Services Act 2019 (FSA): Oversees virtual/digital asset activities, ensuring GFSC compliance for transfers, storage, and management.

licensing 20% confidence

Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 – addresses AML/CFT/CPF requirements

licensing 50% confidence

The regime is principles-based, with 10 core principles covering governance, risk management, financial stability, data security, and customer protection; applicants must demonstrate compliance, including "mind and management" in Gibraltar (e.g., local office and employees).1 2 6

licensing 50% confidence

Post-licensing, firms must adhere to AML/CFT/CPF under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 ("POCA") and subsidiary rules, including customer due diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, risk assessments, staff training, and appointing a compliance officer.1 2 6

licensing 50% confidence

No separate "crypto-only" license exists; the DLT license covers broader blockchain activities.2

licensing 50% confidence

The DLT Provider Licence is mandatory for any business using blockchain or DLT to store, transmit, or trade digital assets, including crypto exchanges, wallet providers, trading platforms, and custodial services; it falls under Section 8 of the FSA and ensures compliance with 9-10 DLT principles focused on transparency, risk management, AML/CFT, and governance.

licensing 50% confidence

No separate registration regime exists beyond this licensing; firms must be incorporated under the Companies Act 2014 (updated 2022) and comply with Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA) for AML/CFT/CPF, plus consumer protection and intellectual property rules.

licensing 50% confidence

Substance mandates: Local office, local hires (including a manager), and proof of domestic operations; GFSC verifies the firm is genuinely run from Gibraltar.

licensing 50% confidence

Approval: GFSC grants license if criteria met, including AML/CFT protocols and financial soundness; ongoing supervision follows.

licensing 50% confidence

Stage 1 (Initial Application): Submit form, business plan (detailing name, services, address, contact, founders/key persons), and pay non-refundable assessment fee; GFSC reviews viability against DLT principles.

licensing 50% confidence

Stage 2 (Full Application): Pay full fee, submit pack with policy manuals on risk management, IT/security, governance, financial crime (AML/CFT), and compliance procedures.

licensing 50% confidence

Stage 3 (Final Submissions): Provide conduct-of-business policies, non-financial resources info, and individual application forms for directors, shareholders, and key personnel; GFSC assesses business model, security, and substance.

aml 40% confidence

Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA): Core law mandating AML/CFT/CPF obligations for DLT Firms and VASPs, including registration of the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) with GFSC.

aml 40% confidence

Financial Services Act 2019 (FSA): Regulates DLT activities (e.g., storing/transmitting value via DLT) as requiring GFSC authorization; non-DLT crypto activities fall under POCA AML regime.

aml 40% confidence

GFSC issues comprehensive AML/CFT/CPF guidance; VASPs must submit policies/manuals during application.

travel-rule 20% confidence

Threshold Amount: The rule applies to transfers of virtual assets valued at €1,000 or more (equivalent to EUR 1000).

travel-rule 20% confidence

Covered VASPs: All activities matching the FATF definition of Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs)—including exchanges, digital wallet providers, OTC trading desks, safekeeping/administration of virtual assets, and participation in virtual asset issuance/sales—are regulated and supervised by the GFSC. This covers DLT Providers authorised since 1 January 2018 under the Financial Services (DLT Providers and VAA Providers) Regulations 2020.

travel-rule 20% confidence

Technical Implementation Requirements: Originator VASPs must collect and securely transmit (before or alongside the transaction) originator and beneficiary information—such as names and account/wallet details—for transactions over the threshold involving another VASP or relevant financial business. Beneficiary VASPs must obtain and hold this data. Virtual assets are defined in the amended POCA as digital representations of value for payment/investment, excluding fiat digital representations and certain financial instruments.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a foreign-incorporated remote VASP cannot serve Gibraltar residents without first obtaining a GFSC DLT Provider Licence, which requires Gibraltar incorporation, physical office, local management, and full AML/CFT/CPF compliance, making a truly 'remote, no-local-entity' model impermissible.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • May a non-resident provider serve residents from abroad?
  • Does cross-border service trigger licensing, registration, or AML obligations?
  • What enforcement risk exists for unlicensed remote operators?