Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Gibraltar
Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.
Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Gibraltar with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Mandatory DLT Provider Licence under Section 8 of the Financial Services Act 2019 (FSA) for any business using DLT to store, transmit, or trade digital assets
- Full AML/CFT/CPF compliance under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA), including customer due diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, risk assessments, staff training
- Appointment of a Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) registered with GFSC
- Submission of AML/CFT policy manuals during Stage 2 of the DLT licence application
- Compliance with the RFBR Regs 2021 for VASP registration where applicable
- FATF Travel Rule compliance under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (Transfer of Virtual Assets) Regulations 2021 — information sharing on virtual asset transfers
- Sanctions Act 2019 compliance for counter-proliferation screening
Key Restrictions
- Must obtain a DLT Provider Licence — no separate 'stablecoin-specific' or 'crypto-only' licence exists; the DLT licence covers broader blockchain activities
- Mandatory physical presence in Gibraltar (local office, local hires including a manager, proof of domestic operations — "mind and management" in Gibraltar)
- Must be incorporated under the Companies Act 2014 (updated 2022)
- Authorized capital not fixed but must demonstrate financial stability; GFSC assesses on a project-specific basis
- Stablecoin may qualify as an investment under SIBA if it has security-like features, potentially triggering additional licensing requirements
- No specific 1:1 reserve, segregation, audit, or redemption framework for stablecoins in available sources — these would be assessed on a principles-basis by GFSC
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity — stablecoin-specific rules (e.g., reserve composition, segregation, audit frequency, redemption rights) are absent from the available regulatory framework; the GFSC applies a principles-based approach with case-by-case assessment
- Potential dual classification risk — stablecoin may be treated as an 'investment' under SIBA if offered to the public with security-like features, triggering a separate regulatory track
- High operational burden of DLT licence (3-stage application, substance requirements, non-refundable assessment fees, annual fees such as £50k for exchanges)
- No clear regime for foreign-issued stablecoins — the framework does not explicitly address whether foreign stablecoins may be distributed locally without local issuance
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Financial Services Act 2018 – establishes the 10 key principles for DLT business operations
The DLT Regulations – govern distributed ledger technology providers
Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 – addresses AML/CFT/CPF requirements
Companies Act (2014, updated January 2022) – governs company registration and reporting
They may qualify as investments under the Specialised Investment Business Act (SIBA) framework if facts indicate security-like features (e.g., offered to the public or tied to specific investors).
The GFSC assesses based on issuance context, issuer status, and utility (e.g., payment facilitation).
Requirements include physical presence, qualified management, transparent ownership, and annual fees (e.g., £50,000 for exchanges).
Token sales (potentially including stablecoin issuance) require GFSC registration and AML due diligence.
GFSC supervision ensures market integrity, but stablecoin-specific rules (e.g., 1:1 reserves) are absent from sources.
Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC): The main authority, responsible for licensing, supervising, and enforcing rules on DLT firms, virtual asset service providers (VASPs), crypto exchanges, custody services, and trading platforms. It ensures compliance with international standards like FATF, including customer verification and risk management.
Financial Services Act 2019 (FSA): Oversees virtual/digital asset activities, ensuring GFSC compliance for transfers, storage, and management.
Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 – addresses AML/CFT/CPF requirements
DLT Framework (introduced 2018): Pioneering principles-based regulations for DLT operators, covering licensing, governance, and consumer protection; developed from the 2014 Cryptocurrency Working Group.
The regime is principles-based, with 10 core principles covering governance, risk management, financial stability, data security, and customer protection; applicants must demonstrate compliance, including "mind and management" in Gibraltar (e.g., local office and employees).1 2 6
Post-licensing, firms must adhere to AML/CFT/CPF under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 ("POCA") and subsidiary rules, including customer due diligence (CDD), transaction monitoring, risk assessments, staff training, and appointing a compliance officer.1 2 6
No separate "crypto-only" license exists; the DLT license covers broader blockchain activities.2
The DLT Provider Licence is mandatory for any business using blockchain or DLT to store, transmit, or trade digital assets, including crypto exchanges, wallet providers, trading platforms, and custodial services; it falls under Section 8 of the FSA and ensures compliance with 9-10 DLT principles focused on transparency, risk management, AML/CFT, and governance.
No separate registration regime exists beyond this licensing; firms must be incorporated under the Companies Act 2014 (updated 2022) and comply with Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA) for AML/CFT/CPF, plus consumer protection and intellectual property rules.
Activities like ICOs and non-security token sales may require additional Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration if applicable.
Authorized capital varies by project specifics and is not fixed; applicants must demonstrate financial stability, often via business plans showing sufficient resources for operations, risk management, and substance in Gibraltar (e.g., real office, local employees, manager).
Substance mandates: Local office, local hires (including a manager), and proof of domestic operations; GFSC verifies the firm is genuinely run from Gibraltar.
Stage 1 (Initial Application): Submit form, business plan (detailing name, services, address, contact, founders/key persons), and pay non-refundable assessment fee; GFSC reviews viability against DLT principles.
Stage 2 (Full Application): Pay full fee, submit pack with policy manuals on risk management, IT/security, governance, financial crime (AML/CFT), and compliance procedures.
Stage 3 (Final Submissions): Provide conduct-of-business policies, non-financial resources info, and individual application forms for directors, shareholders, and key personnel; GFSC assesses business model, security, and substance.
Approval: GFSC grants license if criteria met, including AML/CFT protocols and financial soundness; ongoing supervision follows.
Proceeds of Crime Act 2015 (POCA): Core law mandating AML/CFT/CPF obligations for DLT Firms and VASPs, including registration of the Money Laundering Reporting Officer (MLRO) with GFSC.
Financial Services Act 2019 (FSA): Regulates DLT activities (e.g., storing/transmitting value via DLT) as requiring GFSC authorization; non-DLT crypto activities fall under POCA AML regime.
RFBR Regs 2021: Requires registration for AML/CFT supervision of VASPs not otherwise regulated.
Sanctions Act 2019: Expected compliance for counter-proliferation.
GFSC issues comprehensive AML/CFT/CPF guidance; VASPs must submit policies/manuals during application.
GFSC website: https://www.fsc.gi/ (regulatory body for oversight).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a stablecoin issuer may operate in Gibraltar under a DLT Provider Licence (high burden, principles-based, with mandatory local substance), but no stablecoin-specific rules exist for reserves, segregation, audit, or redemption, creating significant regulatory ambiguity for this operating model.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
- What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
- What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
- Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?