Crypto ATM / kiosk operator in Guatemala
Physical kiosks that exchange cash for crypto (and sometimes vice versa). High-cash AML risk profile.
Crypto ATM is conditionally permitted in Guatemala with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Medium
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- CDD/KYC: Must identify and verify customers (gt.aml.customer-due-diligence-cddkyc-identifying)
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Report suspicious transactions to the IVE (gt.aml.suspicious-transaction-reporting-str-reporting)
- Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screen against OFAC, EU, UN, and domestic sanctions lists (gt.aml.sanctioned-entity-screening-screening-customers)
- Record-Keeping: Maintain records of customer ID and transactions for at least 5 years (gt.aml.record-keeping-maintaining-records-of-customer)
- Travel Rule compliance: Obtain/originate and transmit originator/beneficiary info for virtual asset transfers per FATF Rec. 16 (gt.aml.travel-rule-indirectly-while-not)
- Internal Controls: Establish AML/CFT policies and procedures (gt.aml.internal-controls-establishing-and-maintaining)
- Risk Assessment: Conduct regular ML/FT risk assessments (gt.aml.risk-assessment-conducting-regular-risk)
- Prohibit transactions with comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk) (gt.aml.comprehensively-sanctioned-jurisdictions-vasps-must)
- Enhanced Due Diligence for high-risk jurisdictions as identified by FATF (gt.aml.high-risk-jurisdictions-even-outside-of)
Key Restrictions
- No specific cryptocurrency license exists — operator must register as a general business entity (Sociedad Anónima) with the Registro Mercantil (gt.licensing.no-specific-cryptocurrency-license-is, gt.licensing.general-business-registration-any-company, gt.licensing.constituition-of-a-legal-entity)
- Local entity required: must establish a legal entity with a registered office and legal representation in Guatemala (gt.licensing.local-presence-any-company-wishing)
- Fiat-to-crypto and crypto-to-fiat cash transactions fall under existing financial regulations governing money transmitters/payment service providers by interpretation (gt.licensing.fiat-onoff-ramps-if-an-exchange)
- Virtual assets are not legal tender, not regulated by the SIB, and carry significant risks per SIB warnings (gt.licensing.sib-statements-on-virtual-assets, gt.licensing.example-historical-reference-though-direct)
- No specific capital requirements for VASPs, but if classified as a money transmitter, existing SIB capital requirements apply (gt.licensing.capital-requirements-no-specific-capital)
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity: Guatemala has no explicit crypto/VASP regulatory framework, creating uncertainty about whether ATM/kiosk operators fall under SIB supervision or not (gt.licensing.no-specific-cryptocurrency-license-is, gt.licensing.indirect-applicability-if-a-vasp)
- FATF pressure: Guatemala, as a GAFILAT member, may implement FATF Rec. 15 at any time, creating a shifting regulatory landscape (gt.licensing.fatf-recommendations-guatemala-is-a)
- Cash-intensive AML risk: Crypto ATMs with cash-in/cash-out functions attract high AML scrutiny; indirect applicability of Decree 67-2001 could be enforced retroactively against operators (gt.licensing.ley-contra-el-lavado-de)
- SIB statements explicitly warn that virtual assets are unregulated and not supervised — may create operational reputational risk with banking partners (gt.licensing.example-search-for-similar-current)
- No clear cash-transaction reporting threshold (CTR) for crypto ATMs specified in law — potential exposure if operating without guidance
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No specific cryptocurrency license is required.
Fiat On/Off-Ramps: If an exchange, custody provider, or payment processor facilitates transactions involving fiat currency (e.g., Guatemalan Quetzal, USD) to/from cryptocurrencies, they might fall under the existing financial regulations governing money transmitters, payment service providers, or other financial intermediaries. In such cases, they would likely need to comply with traditional financial licensing requirements from the SIB.
General Business Registration: Any company operating in Guatemala, regardless of its specific industry, must be legally constituted and registered with the Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry of the Republic).
Capital Requirements: No specific capital requirements for VASPs are stipulated in Guatemalan law. If the entity were to engage in activities regulated by the SIB (e.g., traditional money remittance), then existing capital requirements for those specific financial activities would apply.
Local Presence: Any company wishing to operate legally in Guatemala (even without a specific crypto license) would need to establish a legal entity (e.g., a corporation) registered with the Registro Mercantil, which implies having a registered office and legal representation in the country.
Constituition of a legal entity: Typically a corporation (Sociedad Anónima) through a public deed with a notary.
Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree No. 67-2001) and its Regulations: While this law does not explicitly mention "virtual assets" or "cryptocurrencies," it applies to "obligated entities" (e.g., banks, financial institutions, certain non-financial businesses and professions) involved in financial transactions.
Indirect Applicability: If a VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat transactions, the fiat portion of these transactions would be subject to the existing AML/CFT framework. This means performing KYC (Know Your Customer) on users, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Special Verification Intendancy (IVE) – a unit within the SIB.
FATF Recommendations: Guatemala is a member of the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), which adheres to FATF recommendations. FATF Recommendation 15 specifically calls for the regulation of VASPs for AML/CFT purposes. While Guatemala has not fully implemented this recommendation for VAs, it is under international pressure to do so. Therefore, future legislation is likely to include specific VASP AML/CFT obligations.
SIB Statements on Virtual Assets: The SIB regularly issues press releases and circulars clarifying its position. You would typically find these under "Comunicados de Prensa" or "Normativa." A key message is that virtual assets are not regulated.
Example historical reference (though direct URL may change): Communiqués from SIB often reiterate that "los activos virtuales o criptoactivos no son moneda de curso legal en el país y no se encuentran bajo la supervisión y regulación de esta Superintendencia."
Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001): This law establishes the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering. It defines "supervised entities" which, by interpretation and international standards (FATF), should include VASPs, particularly those with a fiat gateway.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identifying and verifying the identity of customers, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing risks.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions to the IVE. This would include transactions linked to sanctioned entities or high-risk jurisdictions.
Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screening customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and any other relevant domestic (e.g., PEP lists, if maintained by IVE) or international sanctions lists.
Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for a specified period (typically 5 years).
"Travel Rule" (indirectly): While not explicitly codified for crypto in Guatemala, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. This is a critical component for sanctions screening in cross-border crypto transactions.
Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including those related to sanctions.
Comprehensively Sanctioned Jurisdictions: VASPs must prohibit transactions with or involvement in countries subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, regions of Ukraine like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).
High-Risk Jurisdictions: Even outside of explicit sanctions, FATF identifies high-risk jurisdictions. VASPs should implement enhanced due diligence for transactions involving these areas.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — Crypto ATM/kiosk operators can operate in Guatemala under a general business registration and the indirect AML/CFT framework (Decree 67-2001), but face significant regulatory ambiguity as no specific crypto or ATM-kiosk license exists, virtual assets are explicitly not regulated by the SIB, and cash-transaction reporting thresholds are not clearly defined for crypto-fiat cash transactions.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What money-transmitter / kiosk-specific license is required?
- What cash-transaction reporting thresholds apply?
- What enhanced-KYC obligations attach to cash-in / cash-out?