← Regulations / Guatemala / Operating Models / CEX

Centralized exchange in Guatemala

Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

CEX is conditionally permitted in Guatemala with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001) applies — while it does not explicitly mention VAs, fiat-gateway activities bring the exchange under the AML framework.
  • Ley Contra el Financiamiento del Terrorismo (Decree 58-2005) applies for CFT compliance.
  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC) — identify and verify customer identity, understand business nature, assess risk.
  • Sanctioned Entity Screening — screen customers/transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and relevant domestic sanctions lists (e.g., PEP lists).
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) — report suspicious transactions to the Intendencia de Verificación Especial (IVE).
  • Record-Keeping — maintain customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for at least 5 years.
  • Internal Controls — establish and maintain AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls.
  • Risk Assessment — conduct regular ML/FT risk assessments.
  • Travel Rule (indirectly) — FATF Recommendation 16 applies per GAFILAT membership; VASPs should obtain and transmit originator/beneficiary info for virtual asset transfers, though not explicitly codified in domestic law.
  • Prohibit transactions with comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk regions).
  • Enhanced Due Diligence for high-risk jurisdictions as identified by FATF.

Key Restrictions

  • No specific cryptocurrency exchange license exists — the operator relies on general business and AML frameworks.
  • Fiat on/off-ramp activity may trigger regulation as a money transmitter or payment service provider under existing financial law.
  • Virtual assets are not legal tender and are not supervised by the SIB — the SIB regularly warns that VAs carry significant risks and lack regulatory protection.
  • A local legal entity (Sociedad Anónima) must be constituted by public deed before a notary and registered with the Registro Mercantil.
  • Tax registration (NIT) with the Superintendencia de Administración Tributaria (SAT) is required.
  • No specific capital requirements for VASPs are stipulated, but if fiat money transmission applies, existing SIB capital requirements for financial activities would apply.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity — Guatemala has not fully implemented FATF Recommendation 15 for VASPs, creating legal uncertainty for exchange operations.
  • The SIB repeatedly warns VAs are unregulated and not legal tender, creating reputational and enforcement risk if the regulator later takes a restrictive stance.
  • No dedicated custody segregation rules exist for crypto assets — user asset protection is legally uncertain.
  • FATF/GAFILAT pressure may lead to sudden regulatory changes that could disrupt operations or impose retroactive requirements.
  • The travel rule is not explicitly codified for crypto, creating compliance ambiguity for cross-border withdrawals.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

Fiat On/Off-Ramps: If an exchange, custody provider, or payment processor facilitates transactions involving fiat currency (e.g., Guatemalan Quetzal, USD) to/from cryptocurrencies, they might fall under the existing financial regulations governing money transmitters, payment service providers, or other financial intermediaries. In such cases, they would likely need to comply with traditional financial licensing requirements from the SIB.

licensing 60% confidence

General Business Registration: Any company operating in Guatemala, regardless of its specific industry, must be legally constituted and registered with the Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry of the Republic).

licensing 60% confidence

Capital Requirements: No specific capital requirements for VASPs are stipulated in Guatemalan law. If the entity were to engage in activities regulated by the SIB (e.g., traditional money remittance), then existing capital requirements for those specific financial activities would apply.

licensing 60% confidence

AML/KYC: This is the most critical area where existing laws may have indirect applicability:

licensing 60% confidence

Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree No. 67-2001) and its Regulations: While this law does not explicitly mention "virtual assets" or "cryptocurrencies," it applies to "obligated entities" (e.g., banks, financial institutions, certain non-financial businesses and professions) involved in financial transactions.

licensing 60% confidence

Indirect Applicability: If a VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat transactions, the fiat portion of these transactions would be subject to the existing AML/CFT framework. This means performing KYC (Know Your Customer) on users, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Special Verification Intendancy (IVE) – a unit within the SIB.

licensing 60% confidence

FATF Recommendations: Guatemala is a member of the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), which adheres to FATF recommendations. FATF Recommendation 15 specifically calls for the regulation of VASPs for AML/CFT purposes. While Guatemala has not fully implemented this recommendation for VAs, it is under international pressure to do so. Therefore, future legislation is likely to include specific VASP AML/CFT obligations.

licensing 60% confidence

Local Presence: Any company wishing to operate legally in Guatemala (even without a specific crypto license) would need to establish a legal entity (e.g., a corporation) registered with the Registro Mercantil, which implies having a registered office and legal representation in the country.

licensing 60% confidence

Constituition of a legal entity: Typically a corporation (Sociedad Anónima) through a public deed with a notary.

licensing 60% confidence

Registration with Registro Mercantil: Submit the public deed and other required documents (e.g., identification of shareholders, legal representative) to the General Mercantile Registry.

licensing 60% confidence

Tax Registration: Obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number (NIT) from the Superintendencia de Administración Tributaria (SAT).

licensing 60% confidence

SIB Statements on Virtual Assets: The SIB regularly issues press releases and circulars clarifying its position. You would typically find these under "Comunicados de Prensa" or "Normativa." A key message is that virtual assets are not regulated.

licensing 60% confidence

Example (search for similar current statements): Search their site for "activos virtuales" or "criptomonedas". You will likely find repeated warnings stating VAs are not legal tender, are not regulated by the SIB, and carry significant risks.

licensing 60% confidence

Example historical reference (though direct URL may change): Communiqués from SIB often reiterate that "los activos virtuales o criptoactivos no son moneda de curso legal en el país y no se encuentran bajo la supervisión y regulación de esta Superintendencia."

licensing 60% confidence

Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry):

aml 20% confidence

Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001): This law establishes the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering. It defines "supervised entities" which, by interpretation and international standards (FATF), should include VASPs, particularly those with a fiat gateway.

aml 20% confidence

Ley Contra el Financiamiento del Terrorismo (Decree 58-2005): This law complements the AML framework by specifically targeting the financing of terrorism.

aml 20% confidence

Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identifying and verifying the identity of customers, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing risks.

aml 20% confidence

Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screening customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and any other relevant domestic (e.g., PEP lists, if maintained by IVE) or international sanctions lists.

aml 20% confidence

Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions to the IVE. This would include transactions linked to sanctioned entities or high-risk jurisdictions.

aml 20% confidence

Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for a specified period (typically 5 years).

aml 20% confidence

Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.

aml 20% confidence

Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including those related to sanctions.

aml 20% confidence

"Travel Rule" (indirectly): While not explicitly codified for crypto in Guatemala, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. This is a critical component for sanctions screening in cross-border crypto transactions.

aml 20% confidence

The IVE's focus is on AML/CFT, and any lists they might maintain would typically be related to politically exposed persons (PEPs) or individuals/entities subject to local criminal investigations related to money laundering or terrorism financing, which are usually derived from or aligned with international lists and law enforcement efforts.

aml 20% confidence

For sanctions compliance, entities in Guatemala must rely on the international lists from OFAC, EU, and UN.

aml 20% confidence

Comprehensively Sanctioned Jurisdictions: VASPs must prohibit transactions with or involvement in countries subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, regions of Ukraine like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).

aml 20% confidence

High-Risk Jurisdictions: Even outside of explicit sanctions, FATF identifies high-risk jurisdictions. VASPs should implement enhanced due diligence for transactions involving these areas.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a centralized exchange can operate in Guatemala without a specific crypto license, but must incorporate a local entity, register with the Registro Mercantil, comply with the general AML/CFT framework (Decree 67-2001) for fiat-gateway activities, and operate in a regulatory gray area where the SIB has stated virtual assets are not regulated or supervised.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What exchange / VASP license applies?
  • What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
  • What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
  • What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?