Custodial wallet / SaaS in Guatemala
Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).
Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Guatemala with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and low licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Low
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- KYC/CDD: Identify and verify customer identity under Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001).
- Sanctioned entity screening against OFAC, EU, UN, and any relevant domestic sanctions lists.
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) to the Intendencia de Verificación Especial (IVE).
- Record-keeping: maintain identification data, transaction data, and STRs for at least 5 years.
- Internal controls and AML/CFT policies and procedures must be established and maintained.
- Regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including sanctions-related risks.
- Travel Rule (FATF Rec. 16): Obtain and transmit originator/beneficiary info for virtual asset transfers (indirectly applicable via FATF/GAFILAT membership).
- Transactions with comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk) must be prohibited.
- Enhanced due diligence for high-risk jurisdictions as identified by FATF.
Key Restrictions
- No specific crypto/custody license exists — the operator relies on general business registration only.
- If the custodial wallet facilitates fiat on/off-ramps, it may fall under existing financial regulations for money transmitters or payment services, triggering SIB oversight.
- Virtual assets are not regulated or supervised by the SIB — the SIB has repeatedly stated they are not legal tender and carry significant risks.
- A local legal entity (e.g., Sociedad Anónima) must be constituted via public deed and registered with the Registro Mercantil.
- Tax registration (NIT) with SAT is required.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity: No explicit VASP or custody regime exists — FATF Recommendation 15 (VASP regulation) has not been fully implemented, creating enforcement uncertainty.
- SIB has repeatedly warned that virtual assets are not regulated — operators risk regulatory action if the SIB reinterprets custodial wallet activity as a financial service.
- Indirect AML obligations for fiat gateway create uncertainty about which entity (SaaS provider vs. white-label client) bears primary KYC/STR responsibility.
- Lack of specific segregation, insurance, or proof-of-reserves rules means there is no statutory framework to protect user funds in the event of insolvency or hack.
- Reputational risk: operating in a grey zone could attract negative attention from the SIB or SAT.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No specific cryptocurrency license is required.
General Business Registration: Any company operating in Guatemala, regardless of its specific industry, must be legally constituted and registered with the Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry of the Republic).
Local Presence: Any company wishing to operate legally in Guatemala (even without a specific crypto license) would need to establish a legal entity (e.g., a corporation) registered with the Registro Mercantil, which implies having a registered office and legal representation in the country.
Constituition of a legal entity: Typically a corporation (Sociedad Anónima) through a public deed with a notary.
Registration with Registro Mercantil: Submit the public deed and other required documents (e.g., identification of shareholders, legal representative) to the General Mercantile Registry.
Tax Registration: Obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number (NIT) from the Superintendencia de Administración Tributaria (SAT).
SIB Statements on Virtual Assets: The SIB regularly issues press releases and circulars clarifying its position. You would typically find these under "Comunicados de Prensa" or "Normativa." A key message is that virtual assets are not regulated.
Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree No. 67-2001) and its Regulations: While this law does not explicitly mention "virtual assets" or "cryptocurrencies," it applies to "obligated entities" (e.g., banks, financial institutions, certain non-financial businesses and professions) involved in financial transactions.
Indirect Applicability: If a VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat transactions, the fiat portion of these transactions would be subject to the existing AML/CFT framework. This means performing KYC (Know Your Customer) on users, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Special Verification Intendancy (IVE) – a unit within the SIB.
Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001): This law establishes the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering. It defines "supervised entities" which, by interpretation and international standards (FATF), should include VASPs, particularly those with a fiat gateway.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identifying and verifying the identity of customers, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing risks.
Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screening customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and any other relevant domestic (e.g., PEP lists, if maintained by IVE) or international sanctions lists.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions to the IVE. This would include transactions linked to sanctioned entities or high-risk jurisdictions.
Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for a specified period (typically 5 years).
Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including those related to sanctions.
"Travel Rule" (indirectly): While not explicitly codified for crypto in Guatemala, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. This is a critical component for sanctions screening in cross-border crypto transactions.
Comprehensively Sanctioned Jurisdictions: VASPs must prohibit transactions with or involvement in countries subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, regions of Ukraine like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).
High-Risk Jurisdictions: Even outside of explicit sanctions, FATF identifies high-risk jurisdictions. VASPs should implement enhanced due diligence for transactions involving these areas.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- low
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — custodial wallet / SaaS providers may operate in Guatemala without a specific crypto custody license, but must register a local entity, comply with general AML obligations under Decree 67-2001 (especially if involving fiat), and face significant regulatory ambiguity given the SIB's position that virtual assets are unregulated and not supervised.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
- What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
- What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?