On-shore VASP in Guatemala
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Guatemala with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and low licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Low
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identify and verify customer identity, understand business nature, and assess risks — per Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001).
- Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screen customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN sanctions lists (no local crypto-specific sanctions list exists).
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Report suspicious transactions to the Intendencia de Verificación Especial (IVE).
- Record-Keeping: Maintain customer ID, transaction data, and STR records for at least 5 years.
- Internal Controls: Establish and maintain AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls.
- Risk Assessment: Conduct regular ML/FT risk assessments, including sanctions-related risks.
- Travel Rule compliance (indirectly via FATF Recommendation 16): Obtain and transmit originator/beneficiary info for cross-border virtual asset transfers.
- Prohibit transactions with comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, Crimea/Donetsk/Luhansk regions of Ukraine).
- Enhanced Due Diligence for transactions involving FATF-identified high-risk jurisdictions.
Key Restrictions
- No specific cryptocurrency license exists — operator must rely on general mercantile registration and, if engaging in fiat on/off-ramp activity, may fall under existing financial regulations for money transmitters/payment service providers.
- Virtual assets are not recognized as legal tender and are explicitly stated by the SIB to be outside its supervision and regulation — operator cannot claim regulatory approval or insurance.
- Must constitute a local legal entity (e.g., Sociedad Anónima) registered with the Registro Mercantil and obtain a Taxpayer ID (NIT) from SAT.
- Fiat-facing activities bring the fiat portion of transactions under the existing AML/CFT framework — no clear exemption or bespoke crypto regime exists.
- No specific capital requirements for VASPs, but if the activity touches regulated financial services (e.g., money remittance), existing SIB capital requirements apply.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity: Guatemala has not fully implemented FATF Recommendation 15 for VASPs, creating legal uncertainty about whether pure crypto-to-crypto activity triggers AML obligations.
- SIB consistently warns the public that virtual assets are unregulated and risky — operating in this environment carries reputational and enforcement exposure if the regulatory stance shifts or retroactive action is taken.
- No bespoke licensing pathway means operators lack a 'safe harbor' — any future regulation could impose retroactive compliance burdens.
- Tax territoriality principle creates complexity for digital/crypto income sourcing, increasing audit risk.
- Reliance on international sanctions lists (OFAC, EU, UN) without local crypto-specific guidance increases compliance interpretation risk.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No specific cryptocurrency license is required.
Fiat On/Off-Ramps: If an exchange, custody provider, or payment processor facilitates transactions involving fiat currency (e.g., Guatemalan Quetzal, USD) to/from cryptocurrencies, they might fall under the existing financial regulations governing money transmitters, payment service providers, or other financial intermediaries. In such cases, they would likely need to comply with traditional financial licensing requirements from the SIB.
General Business Registration: Any company operating in Guatemala, regardless of its specific industry, must be legally constituted and registered with the Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry of the Republic).
Capital Requirements: No specific capital requirements for VASPs are stipulated in Guatemalan law. If the entity were to engage in activities regulated by the SIB (e.g., traditional money remittance), then existing capital requirements for those specific financial activities would apply.
AML/KYC: This is the most critical area where existing laws may have indirect applicability:
Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree No. 67-2001) and its Regulations: While this law does not explicitly mention "virtual assets" or "cryptocurrencies," it applies to "obligated entities" (e.g., banks, financial institutions, certain non-financial businesses and professions) involved in financial transactions.
Indirect Applicability: If a VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat transactions, the fiat portion of these transactions would be subject to the existing AML/CFT framework. This means performing KYC (Know Your Customer) on users, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Special Verification Intendancy (IVE) – a unit within the SIB.
FATF Recommendations: Guatemala is a member of the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), which adheres to FATF recommendations. FATF Recommendation 15 specifically calls for the regulation of VASPs for AML/CFT purposes. While Guatemala has not fully implemented this recommendation for VAs, it is under international pressure to do so. Therefore, future legislation is likely to include specific VASP AML/CFT obligations.
Local Presence: Any company wishing to operate legally in Guatemala (even without a specific crypto license) would need to establish a legal entity (e.g., a corporation) registered with the Registro Mercantil, which implies having a registered office and legal representation in the country.
Constituition of a legal entity: Typically a corporation (Sociedad Anónima) through a public deed with a notary.
Registration with Registro Mercantil: Submit the public deed and other required documents (e.g., identification of shareholders, legal representative) to the General Mercantile Registry.
Tax Registration: Obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number (NIT) from the Superintendencia de Administración Tributaria (SAT).
Superintendencia de Bancos de Guatemala (SIB):
SIB Statements on Virtual Assets: The SIB regularly issues press releases and circulars clarifying its position. You would typically find these under "Comunicados de Prensa" or "Normativa." A key message is that virtual assets are not regulated.
Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001): This law establishes the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering. It defines "supervised entities" which, by interpretation and international standards (FATF), should include VASPs, particularly those with a fiat gateway.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identifying and verifying the identity of customers, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing risks.
Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screening customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and any other relevant domestic (e.g., PEP lists, if maintained by IVE) or international sanctions lists.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions to the IVE. This would include transactions linked to sanctioned entities or high-risk jurisdictions.
Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for a specified period (typically 5 years).
Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including those related to sanctions.
"Travel Rule" (indirectly): While not explicitly codified for crypto in Guatemala, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. This is a critical component for sanctions screening in cross-border crypto transactions.
For sanctions compliance, entities in Guatemala must rely on the international lists from OFAC, EU, and UN.
Comprehensively Sanctioned Jurisdictions: VASPs must prohibit transactions with or involvement in countries subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, regions of Ukraine like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).
High-Risk Jurisdictions: Even outside of explicit sanctions, FATF identifies high-risk jurisdictions. VASPs should implement enhanced due diligence for transactions involving these areas.
Rate: The standard rate for capital gains from the sale of assets is 10% on the net gain.
Territoriality Principle: Guatemala applies the territoriality principle, meaning that generally only income sourced within Guatemala is subject to Guatemalan income tax. However, the source of income from digital activities can be complex to determine and may require careful analysis.
Corporate Income Tax: Guatemalan companies that earn income from cryptocurrency-related activities (e.g., trading, mining, providing crypto services) would be subject to the standard corporate income tax rate.
Services Related to Crypto: Services related to cryptocurrencies, such as exchange fees charged by a Guatemalan crypto platform, custodial services, or consulting services, would likely be subject to the standard 12% IVA.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — An on-shore VASP can operate in Guatemala via a locally-incorporated entity (Sociedad Anónima) and general mercantile registration, with no specific crypto license, but must comply with the existing AML/CFT framework (Decree 67-2001) for any fiat-facing activity and operate under significant regulatory ambiguity since virtual assets are explicitly unregulated by the SIB.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?