Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Guatemala
Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.
Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Guatemala with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC) — identifying and verifying customer identity and assessing risk (gt.aml.customer-due-diligence-cddkyc-identifying)
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) — report suspicious transactions to the Intendencia de Verificación Especial (IVE) (gt.aml.suspicious-transaction-reporting-str-reporting)
- Sanctioned entity screening — screen against OFAC, EU, UN sanctions lists (gt.aml.sanctioned-entity-screening-screening-customers)
- Record-keeping — maintain customer ID, transaction, and STR records for at least 5 years (gt.aml.record-keeping-maintaining-records-of-customer)
- Internal controls — establish AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls (gt.aml.internal-controls-establishing-and-maintaining)
- Risk assessment — conduct regular ML/FT risk assessments (gt.aml.risk-assessment-conducting-regular-risk)
- Travel Rule (indirectly) — FATF Recommendation 16 applies as Guatemala is a GAFILAT member; obtain and transmit originator/beneficiary info for VA transfers (gt.aml.travel-rule-indirectly-while-not)
- Enhanced due diligence for high-risk jurisdictions and comprehensively sanctioned jurisdictions (Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, etc.) (gt.aml.comprehensively-sanctioned-jurisdictions-vasps-must) (gt.aml.high-risk-jurisdictions-even-outside-of)
- Fiat-leg transactions must comply with the existing AML framework under Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001) (gt.licensing.indirect-applicability-if-a-vasp)
Key Restrictions
- Financial entities supervised by the Superintendencia de Bancos de Guatemala (SIB) are categorically prohibited from carrying out operations with cryptocurrencies (gt.stablecoin.financial-entities-supervised-by-the) (gt.stablecoin.financial-entities-supervised-by-sib)
- Stablecoins are not legal tender — only the Quetzal (GTQ) is legal tender (gt.stablecoin.cryptocurrencies-including-stablecoins-are-not)
- No specific licensing regime exists for stablecoin issuers — any issuance would occur in a legal vacuum outside the formal financial system (gt.stablecoin.none-there-is-no-specific) (gt.licensing.no-specific-cryptocurrency-license-is)
- If stablecoins are structured as securities (e.g., representing shares or debt), existing securities laws (Ley del Mercado de Valores y Mercancías) could theoretically apply (gt.stablecoin.existing-laws-if-a-stablecoin)
- General business registration is required: incorporation as a Sociedad Anónima, registration with Registro Mercantil, and tax registration with SAT (gt.licensing.general-business-registration-any-company) (gt.licensing.constituition-of-a-legal-entity) (gt.licensing.registration-with-registro-mercantil-submit) (gt.licensing.tax-registration-obtain-a-taxpayer)
- Local entity required — any company operating in Guatemala must establish a legal entity with registered office and legal representation (gt.licensing.local-presence-any-company-wishing)
Key Risks
- Complete regulatory vacuum — no reserve requirements, no issuer licensing, no redemption rights, and no consumer protections exist for stablecoin holders under Guatemalan law (gt.stablecoin.none-since-stablecoins-are-not) (gt.stablecoin.not-protected-as-stablecoins-are)
- Banguat and SIB have publicly warned against cryptocurrencies and treat them as high-risk unregulated digital assets — this negative stance creates reputational and enforcement risk (gt.stablecoin.banco-de-guatemala-banguat-comunicado) (gt.stablecoin.banguats-view-banguat-generally-treats)
- Prohibition on supervised financial entities engaging with crypto — if the issuer itself or its banking partners are SIB-supervised, they cannot touch the stablecoin (gt.stablecoin.financial-entities-supervised-by-sib)
- AML/CFT exposure — while crypto is unregulated, any fiat gateway triggers the existing AML framework; failure to register as an obligated entity or file STRs could lead to criminal liability under Decree 67-2001 (gt.licensing.ley-contra-el-lavado-de)
- FATF Recommendation 15 not fully implemented — regulatory uncertainty means the AML obligations could be expanded or clarified at any time, creating compliance whiplash (gt.licensing.fatf-recommendations-guatemala-is-a)
- Tax ambiguity under territoriality principle — source of income from stablecoin issuance and redemption in digital cross-border scenarios is complex and subject to SAT interpretation (gt.tax.territoriality-principle-guatemala-applies-the)
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Banco de Guatemala (Banguat) Comunicado de Prensa (June 23, 2021): Banguat issued a press release titled "Banco de Guatemala advierte sobre riesgos de las criptomonedas" (Banco de Guatemala warns about risks of cryptocurrencies). This communiqué explicitly states:
Cryptocurrencies (including stablecoins) are not legal tender in Guatemala. The only legal tender is the Quetzal (GTQ), as defined by the Monetary Law.
They are not issued or backed by a central bank or government.
They lack regulatory and supervisory oversight, offering no guarantees or legal protection to users.
Financial entities supervised by the SIB are prohibited from carrying out operations with cryptocurrencies or offering products related to them.
Financial entities supervised by SIB are prohibited from engaging with cryptocurrencies.
No Formal Classification: As there is no specific legislation for stablecoins or cryptocurrencies, they are not formally classified as e-money, payment tokens, or securities under a dedicated crypto regulatory framework.
Banguat's View: Banguat generally treats all cryptocurrencies, including stablecoins, as high-risk, unregulated digital assets that exist outside the traditional financial system.
Existing Laws: If a stablecoin were structured in a way that mimicked existing financial instruments (e.g., if it represented a share in a company or a debt instrument), existing securities laws (e.g., Ley del Mercado de Valores y Mercancías - Decree No. 34-96) might theoretically apply, but this has not been explicitly interpreted or applied to stablecoins by Guatemalan authorities. However, the Banguat's directive prohibiting supervised financial entities from dealing with them largely bypasses this.
None: Since stablecoins are not regulated, there are no prescribed reserve requirements for issuers in Guatemala. Any stablecoin issuer operating in Guatemala would do so without any official oversight regarding their reserves.
None: There is no specific licensing regime for stablecoin issuers in Guatemala. Entities issuing stablecoins would not be operating under a financial license provided by Banguat or SIB.
Not Protected: As stablecoins are unregulated and not recognized within the formal financial system, there are no legally enforceable redemption rights protected by Guatemalan financial law. Users would rely solely on the terms and conditions provided by the private issuer, with no recourse to national regulatory bodies for enforcement.
Stablecoins are not legal tender.
They are not regulated, supervised, or guaranteed by the state.
No specific classification, reserve requirements, issuer licensing, or redemption rights exist under Guatemalan law.
No specific cryptocurrency license is required.
General Business Registration: Any company operating in Guatemala, regardless of its specific industry, must be legally constituted and registered with the Registro Mercantil General de la República (General Mercantile Registry of the Republic).
Local Presence: Any company wishing to operate legally in Guatemala (even without a specific crypto license) would need to establish a legal entity (e.g., a corporation) registered with the Registro Mercantil, which implies having a registered office and legal representation in the country.
Constituition of a legal entity: Typically a corporation (Sociedad Anónima) through a public deed with a notary.
Registration with Registro Mercantil: Submit the public deed and other required documents (e.g., identification of shareholders, legal representative) to the General Mercantile Registry.
Tax Registration: Obtain a Taxpayer Identification Number (NIT) from the Superintendencia de Administración Tributaria (SAT).
Ley contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree No. 67-2001) and its Regulations: While this law does not explicitly mention "virtual assets" or "cryptocurrencies," it applies to "obligated entities" (e.g., banks, financial institutions, certain non-financial businesses and professions) involved in financial transactions.
Indirect Applicability: If a VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat transactions, the fiat portion of these transactions would be subject to the existing AML/CFT framework. This means performing KYC (Know Your Customer) on users, monitoring transactions for suspicious activity, and reporting to the Special Verification Intendancy (IVE) – a unit within the SIB.
FATF Recommendations: Guatemala is a member of the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT), which adheres to FATF recommendations. FATF Recommendation 15 specifically calls for the regulation of VASPs for AML/CFT purposes. While Guatemala has not fully implemented this recommendation for VAs, it is under international pressure to do so. Therefore, future legislation is likely to include specific VASP AML/CFT obligations.
Ley Contra el Lavado de Dinero u Otros Activos (Decree 67-2001): This law establishes the framework for preventing and prosecuting money laundering. It defines "supervised entities" which, by interpretation and international standards (FATF), should include VASPs, particularly those with a fiat gateway.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD/KYC): Identifying and verifying the identity of customers, understanding the nature of their business, and assessing risks.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Reporting any suspicious transactions to the IVE. This would include transactions linked to sanctioned entities or high-risk jurisdictions.
Sanctioned Entity Screening: Screening customers and transactions against OFAC, EU, UN, and any other relevant domestic (e.g., PEP lists, if maintained by IVE) or international sanctions lists.
Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data, transaction data, and STRs for a specified period (typically 5 years).
Internal Controls: Establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls, policies, and procedures to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
Risk Assessment: Conducting regular risk assessments to identify and mitigate ML/FT risks, including those related to sanctions.
"Travel Rule" (indirectly): While not explicitly codified for crypto in Guatemala, FATF Recommendation 16 (Travel Rule) requires VASPs to obtain and transmit originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers. This is a critical component for sanctions screening in cross-border crypto transactions.
Comprehensively Sanctioned Jurisdictions: VASPs must prohibit transactions with or involvement in countries subject to comprehensive OFAC sanctions (e.g., Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria, regions of Ukraine like Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk).
High-Risk Jurisdictions: Even outside of explicit sanctions, FATF identifies high-risk jurisdictions. VASPs should implement enhanced due diligence for transactions involving these areas.
Rate: The standard rate for capital gains from the sale of assets is 10% on the net gain.
Territoriality Principle: Guatemala applies the territoriality principle, meaning that generally only income sourced within Guatemala is subject to Guatemalan income tax. However, the source of income from digital activities can be complex to determine and may require careful analysis.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — stablecoin issuance in Guatemala is legally possible only outside the formal financial system (since SIB-supervised entities are prohibited from crypto), with no specific licensing regime, no reserve or redemption protections, and no consumer safeguards, but requires a local legal entity, general business registration, and compliance with existing AML/CFT obligations for any fiat gateway activity.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
- What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
- What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
- Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?