Crypto ATM / kiosk operator in Honduras
Physical kiosks that exchange cash for crypto (and sometimes vice versa). High-cash AML risk profile.
Crypto ATM is conditionally permitted in Honduras with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Medium
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Customer identification and verification (full legal name, DOB, address, nationality, unique ID number) for all individuals — hn.licensing.for-individuals-obtaining-and-verifying
- For legal entity customers — verify legal name, legal form, address, proof of incorporation, directors, UBOs — hn.licensing.for-legal-entities-obtaining-and
- Understand purpose and intended nature of business relationship — hn.licensing.purpose-and-nature-of-relationship
- Ongoing transaction monitoring to ensure consistency with customer profile — hn.licensing.ongoing-monitoring-continuously-monitoring-transactions
- Risk-based CDD with enhanced due diligence for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex structures — hn.licensing.risk-assessment-implementing-a-risk-based
- Beneficial ownership identification and verification — hn.licensing.beneficial-ownership-identifying-and-verifying
- Sanctions screening against national and international lists — hn.licensing.sanctions-screening-screening-customers-against
- Suspicious transaction reporting (STR) for any transaction, regardless of amount, with reasonable grounds for suspicion — hn.licensing.reporting-obligation-report-any-transaction
- No tipping-off prohibition — hn.licensing.no-tipping-off-prohibits-disclosing-to
- Record-keeping: CDD records, transaction records (including Travel-Rule-type details if practical), STRs — retain for minimum 5 years — hn.licensing.cdd-records-copies-of-identification, hn.licensing.transaction-records-details-of-all, hn.licensing.strs-copies-of-all-suspicious, hn.licensing.retention-period-typically-records-must
Key Restrictions
- Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Honduras and are not backed/regulated by the Central Bank — hn.enforcement.outcome-the-bch-officially-stated
- No specific VASP licensing regime exists; the operator must fit within the general AML law (Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos, Decreto 144-2014) as a 'reporting entity' (sujeto obligado), likely through interaction with regulated financial institutions — hn.licensing.lack-of-specific-licensing-vasps, hn.licensing.while-vasps-are-not-explicitly
- Physical kiosks with cash-in/cash-out will need to establish a local legal entity to register as a sujeto obligado with the CNBS/UIF — inferred from hn.licensing.unidad-de-inteligencia-financiera-uif, hn.licensing.comisin-nacional-de-bancos-y
- Fiat-crypto conversions must flow through regulated financial institutions (banks), which will apply their own AML/CFT obligations — hn.licensing.while-vasps-are-not-explicitly
Key Risks
- High regulatory ambiguity — no specific VASP or crypto-ATM licensing framework exists; operational legality rests on interpretation of general AML law
- Central Bank (BCH) and CNBS have publicly warned against crypto use, creating reputational and political risk despite no outright ban — hn.enforcement.regulatory-focus-honduras-like-many
- No cash-transaction reporting threshold established in the facts; the general AML law only triggers STRs on suspicion regardless of amount, leaving cash-intensive kiosk operations without clear CTR guidance
- If a bank partner withdraws services over compliance concerns, the kiosk operator has no direct access to the financial system — hn.licensing.while-vasps-are-not-explicitly
- Criminal investigation risk under general criminal law for fraud or ML involving crypto — hn.enforcement.criminal-cases-while-there-might
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos (Law Against Money Laundering) – Decreto No. 144-2014.
This law establishes the framework for preventing, detecting, and punishing money laundering and financing of terrorism in Honduras.
It defines "reporting entities" (sujetos obligados) which primarily include banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, and other specified entities, and obliges them to implement AML/CFT measures.
While VASPs are not explicitly named, if a VASP engages in activities that fall under the general definition of financial services or involves fiat currency conversions through regulated entities, those regulated entities (banks, etc.) will apply the requirements of this law.
For Individuals: Obtaining and verifying full legal name, date of birth, residential address, nationality, and a unique identification number (e.g., national ID card, passport). Verification should involve reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.
For Legal Entities: Obtaining and verifying legal name, legal form, address, proof of incorporation/existence, names of directors and beneficial owners (UBOs), and the legal representative's identification.
Purpose and Nature of Relationship: Understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or occasional transaction.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring transactions and activities throughout the business relationship to ensure consistency with the customer's profile and source of funds.
Risk Assessment: Implementing a risk-based approach to CDD, applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons - PEPs, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, complex structures) and simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower-risk ones.
Beneficial Ownership: Identifying and verifying the beneficial owners of legal persons and arrangements.
Sanctions Screening: Screening customers against national and international sanctions lists.
Reporting Obligation: Report any transaction or attempted transaction, regardless of amount, where there are reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorism financing.
No Tipping-Off: Prohibits disclosing to the customer or third parties that an STR has been or will be filed.
CDD Records: Copies of identification documents, verification data, and any other information obtained during the CDD process.
Transaction Records: Details of all transactions, including amounts, types of assets, dates, and parties involved (including originating and beneficiary information, as per FATF Travel Rule principles, even if not explicitly legislated for VASPs in Honduras).
STRs: Copies of all suspicious transaction reports filed.
Retention Period: Typically, records must be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after an occasional transaction has taken place.
Comisión Nacional de Bancos y Seguros (CNBS) – National Commission of Banks and Insurance:
Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera (UIF) – Financial Intelligence Unit:
Banco Central de Honduras (BCH) – Central Bank of Honduras:
Lack of Specific Licensing: VASPs are not currently licensed or specifically regulated as such in Honduras. This creates legal uncertainty and potential operational risks.
Outcome: The BCH officially stated that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Honduras and are not backed or regulated by the Central Bank. It also warned the public about the inherent risks associated with using and investing in cryptocurrencies, emphasizing that they are not recognized as currency or assets by the Honduran financial system. This effectively prohibits financial institutions under BCH supervision from operating with cryptocurrencies as recognized assets and strongly advises the public against their use.
Regulatory Focus: Honduras, like many smaller nations, is still in the early stages of addressing digital assets. Its focus has been on protecting the financial system's stability and informing the public about risks, rather than establishing a licensing regime or proactive enforcement against crypto companies.
Criminal Cases: While there might be instances of fraud or money laundering investigations by the Public Ministry (Ministerio Público) or police involving cryptocurrencies, these fall under general criminal law, not specific cryptocurrency enforcement by a financial regulator against a crypto entity. These are typically cases against individuals involved in scams rather than regulatory actions against established crypto businesses. Information on such criminal cases is often less detailed publicly regarding "penalty amounts" and "entity targeted" in the context of financial regulation.
Absence of Specific Crypto Laws: Honduras does not have specific laws regulating cryptocurrency exchanges or service providers. Therefore, there are no "crypto-specific" regulatory violations for which an entity could be fined or sanctioned by a financial regulator in the way you might see in the US or Europe.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- low
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — Crypto ATM/kiosk operations in Honduras are not specifically regulated or prohibited, but a local entity likely must register as a reporting entity (sujeto obligado) under the general AML law (Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos), implement full CDD/EDD/STR obligations, and rely on regulated bank partners for fiat rails, in an environment where the Central Bank has publicly warned against crypto use.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What money-transmitter / kiosk-specific license is required?
- What cash-transaction reporting thresholds apply?
- What enhanced-KYC obligations attach to cash-in / cash-out?