Centralized exchange in Honduras
Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.
CEX is conditionally permitted in Honduras without local incorporation, subject to AML obligations and low licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- No
- Licensing burden
- Low
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Reporting entities must implement AML/CFT measures under the Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos (Decreto No. 144-2014), though VASPs are not explicitly named — obligations attach if the activity falls under the general definition of financial services or involves fiat conversion through regulated entities.
- Customer identification (CDD) — full name, date of birth, residential address, nationality, unique ID (national ID/passport) for individuals; legal name, form, address, incorporation proof, directors, UBOs for legal entities.
- Beneficial ownership identification and verification required.
- Risk-based approach with EDD for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex structures, and SDD for lower-risk profiles.
- Purpose and nature of business relationship must be documented.
- Ongoing transaction monitoring to ensure consistency with customer profile and source of funds.
- Sanctions screening against national and international sanctions lists.
- Suspicious transaction reporting (STR) — any transaction or attempted transaction with reasonable grounds to suspect ML/TF must be reported, regardless of amount.
- No-tipping-off prohibition.
- Record retention minimum 5 years after business relationship ends or occasional transaction concluded (CDD records, transaction records including originator/beneficiary info, STR copies).
Key Restrictions
- No specific VASP licensing or regulatory framework exists — digital assets are not recognized as legal tender or regulated.
- Central Bank of Honduras (BCH) has repeatedly stated cryptocurrencies are not legal tender, not backed/regulated by the BCH, and carries significant risks (Communiqué 001/2024).
- No specific custodial license, segregation rules, cold storage mandates, or qualified custodian definition exist for digital assets.
- Traditional financial institutions (banks) licensed by CNBS are likely prohibited from offering direct crypto custody services due to BCH warnings and lack of legal framework.
- No defined supervisory authority for VASPs — no registration or licensing regime for crypto exchanges.
- Travel Rule (FATF Recommendation 16) is not implemented for VASPs in Honduras — no threshold, coverage, or technical requirements defined.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity — no VASP-specific law makes lawful operation uncertain; a future regulatory framework could retroactively affect current operations.
- BCH and CNBS have issued public warnings discouraging crypto use, creating reputational and regulatory headwinds.
- No mandated insurance or bonding for custodial assets — clients have no recourse through mandated protections in case of hack or insolvency.
- GAFILAT 2021 Mutual Evaluation rated Honduras Partially Compliant on FATF Recommendations 15 (New Technologies) and 16 (Wire Transfers), pressuring the government to introduce VASP regulation, which could impose sudden compliance burdens.
- Criminal exposure under general fraud/ML laws — any crypto activity investigated under criminal law would lack the safe harbors a formal licensing regime provides.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos (Law Against Money Laundering) – Decreto No. 144-2014.
This law establishes the framework for preventing, detecting, and punishing money laundering and financing of terrorism in Honduras.
It defines "reporting entities" (sujetos obligados) which primarily include banks, financial institutions, insurance companies, and other specified entities, and obliges them to implement AML/CFT measures.
While VASPs are not explicitly named, if a VASP engages in activities that fall under the general definition of financial services or involves fiat currency conversions through regulated entities, those regulated entities (banks, etc.) will apply the requirements of this law.
For Individuals: Obtaining and verifying full legal name, date of birth, residential address, nationality, and a unique identification number (e.g., national ID card, passport). Verification should involve reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.
For Legal Entities: Obtaining and verifying legal name, legal form, address, proof of incorporation/existence, names of directors and beneficial owners (UBOs), and the legal representative's identification.
Purpose and Nature of Relationship: Understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or occasional transaction.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring transactions and activities throughout the business relationship to ensure consistency with the customer's profile and source of funds.
Risk Assessment: Implementing a risk-based approach to CDD, applying enhanced due diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons - PEPs, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, complex structures) and simplified due diligence (SDD) for lower-risk ones.
Beneficial Ownership: Identifying and verifying the beneficial owners of legal persons and arrangements.
Sanctions Screening: Screening customers against national and international sanctions lists.
Reporting Obligation: Report any transaction or attempted transaction, regardless of amount, where there are reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorism financing.
No Tipping-Off: Prohibits disclosing to the customer or third parties that an STR has been or will be filed.
CDD Records: Copies of identification documents, verification data, and any other information obtained during the CDD process.
Transaction Records: Details of all transactions, including amounts, types of assets, dates, and parties involved (including originating and beneficiary information, as per FATF Travel Rule principles, even if not explicitly legislated for VASPs in Honduras).
STRs: Copies of all suspicious transaction reports filed.
Retention Period: Typically, records must be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after an occasional transaction has taken place.
Comisión Nacional de Bancos y Seguros (CNBS) – National Commission of Banks and Insurance:
Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera (UIF) – Financial Intelligence Unit:
Banco Central de Honduras (BCH) – Central Bank of Honduras:
Lack of Specific Licensing: VASPs are not currently licensed or specifically regulated as such in Honduras. This creates legal uncertainty and potential operational risks.
Banco Central de Honduras - Comunicados de Prensa (Press Releases): The BCH frequently publishes statements regarding cryptocurrencies. A prominent one from March 2022 reiterated that crypto assets are not regulated and carry significant risks. While a direct, permalinked communiqué specifically on custody is not available, their general stance is clear. You can monitor their official news section for updates:
Comisión Nacional de Bancos y Seguros (CNBS): As the primary regulator for banks and insurance companies, the CNBS generally aligns with the BCH's stance, focusing on consumer protection and financial stability. No specific custody regulations for digital assets have been issued by the CNBS.
No specific custodial license requirements exist for digital asset custodians in Honduras. Since cryptocurrencies are not recognized or regulated, there is no legal framework or licensing regime for entities providing crypto custody services. Any entity attempting to operate a dedicated crypto custody business would be doing so outside of formal regulatory oversight.
It is highly probable that traditional financial institutions (banks, fiduciaries) licensed by the CNBS are prohibited from offering direct crypto custody services due to the BCH's warnings and the lack of a legal framework.
No specific rules or mandates exist for the segregation of client digital assets. In a regulated environment, segregation is crucial to protect client funds in case of custodian insolvency. However, without a regulatory framework, such requirements are non-existent.
No specific insurance or bonding requirements are mandated for digital asset custodians. This means that if a crypto custody service were to fail or suffer a hack, clients would likely have no recourse through mandated insurance.
No specific cold storage mandates exist. Technical security requirements like the use of cold storage (offline storage of private keys) are typically part of detailed regulatory frameworks for digital asset custodians. Given the absence of such a framework, no such mandates are in place.
No legal definition for a "qualified custodian" in the context of digital assets exists in Honduran law or regulation. The concept of a qualified custodian is generally introduced in jurisdictions where digital assets are recognized and integrated into a regulatory framework, often requiring specific capital, operational, and security standards.
No, not fully adopted. The 2021 GAFILAT MER indicated that Honduras had not yet established a specific regulatory framework for virtual assets or VASPs. While the general Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) framework exists, it does not explicitly define or regulate VASPs, nor does it impose specific AML/CFT obligations on them, including the requirements of FATF Recommendation 15 (new technologies) and Recommendation 16 (wire transfers, extended to VASPs as the Travel Rule).
The report noted that virtual assets are not legally recognized as money or currency under current Honduran law. Consequently, there is no designated supervisory authority for VASPs, and no registration or licensing regime.
Not applicable. Since a comprehensive regulatory framework for VASPs and the specific implementation of the Travel Rule are not yet in place, there is no effective date for these requirements.
Not defined for VASPs. Given the absence of specific VASP regulation, there are no established threshold amounts for the Travel Rule. For traditional wire transfers, FATF Recommendation 16 generally suggests a threshold of USD/EUR 1,000 for transfers that require originator and beneficiary information to be obtained and transmitted. However, this has not been explicitly applied to virtual asset transfers in Honduras.
None explicitly. As virtual assets and VASPs are not specifically defined or regulated under Honduran AML/CFT laws, no specific types of VASPs are currently covered by these obligations.
Not defined. Without a regulatory framework, there are no technical implementation requirements for the Travel Rule in Honduras.
Not specifically applicable to VASP Travel Rule non-compliance. While Honduras has a general AML/CFT law (Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos y Financiamiento del Terrorismo), penalties for non-compliance with the Travel Rule specifically for VASPs do not exist as the rule itself is not implemented for them. Penalties would generally apply to regulated financial institutions for failing to comply with their existing AML/CFT obligations.
GAFILAT 4th Round Mutual Evaluation Report of Honduras (December 2021):
Key points from the report: The report rated Honduras as Partially Compliant (PC) for FATF Recommendation 15 (New Technologies) and Partially Compliant (PC) for Recommendation 16 (Wire Transfers), specifically noting the gaps for VASPs. It stated that Honduras needs to define and regulate VASPs, subject them to AML/CFT obligations, and supervise them effectively.
Regulator Name: Banco Central de Honduras (BCH)
Date: March 25, 2024 (Communiqué 001/2024) - Although this specific communiqué is from 2024, it reiterates and strengthens previous warnings, making it the most current and definitive statement within the timeframe. Previous, less formal warnings have been issued in prior years.
Outcome: The BCH officially stated that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Honduras and are not backed or regulated by the Central Bank. It also warned the public about the inherent risks associated with using and investing in cryptocurrencies, emphasizing that they are not recognized as currency or assets by the Honduran financial system. This effectively prohibits financial institutions under BCH supervision from operating with cryptocurrencies as recognized assets and strongly advises the public against their use.
Absence of Specific Crypto Laws: Honduras does not have specific laws regulating cryptocurrency exchanges or service providers. Therefore, there are no "crypto-specific" regulatory violations for which an entity could be fined or sanctioned by a financial regulator in the way you might see in the US or Europe.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a centralized exchange can operate in Honduras, but only in the absence of a specific VASP licensing regime by relying on general AML/CFT obligations under the Ley Contra el Lavado de Activos; no digital asset custody framework, no Travel Rule requirements, no supervisory authority for VASPs exist, creating significant legal uncertainty and operational risk.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What exchange / VASP license applies?
- What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
- What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
- What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?