Custodial wallet / SaaS in Haiti
Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).
Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Haiti with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- CDD obligations under Loi du 11 novembre 2013 — must obtain/verify identity of natural persons (name, DOB, address, nationality, official ID number) using reliable independent source documents
- CDD obligations for legal persons — must verify name, legal form, address, proof of incorporation, directors/senior management
- Beneficial ownership identification — must identify and verify beneficial owners (ownership/control structure of legal persons)
- Purpose and nature of business relationship must be documented
- Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and transactions for consistency with customer risk profile
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for PEPs, complex/unusually large transactions, high-risk jurisdictions, and privacy-enhancing virtual assets — including additional source-of-funds/wealth info, senior management approval, enhanced monitoring
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) obligation — any transaction or attempted transaction with reasonable grounds to suspect proceeds of crime or terrorist financing, regardless of amount, reported to UCREF
- No-tipping-off prohibition — cannot disclose STR filing to customer or third parties
- Red-flag procedures for virtual assets — unusual patterns, rapid large-sum transfers, mixers/tumblers, attempts to avoid CDD
- Record-keeping: customer identification records, transaction records (including wallet addresses), analysis/STR records — minimum 5-year retention after relationship ends or transaction date
Key Restrictions
- Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender by the BRH (November 2021 communiqué)
- No comprehensive legal/regulatory framework exists specifically for VASPs or custodial wallet services in Haiti
- No specific custody license, segregation, insurance, or proof-of-reserves rules exist for crypto custodians
- The BRH has warned the public that crypto use carries significant risks and is unregulated — effectively discouraging institutional adoption
- Any operator must comply with the general AML/CFT framework (Loi du 11 novembre 2013) which applies to all entities, but there is no tailored VASP registration pathway
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity — no specific VASP/custody framework creates legal uncertainty about whether custodial wallet services are permitted or prohibited
- BRH has signaled a cautious/negative stance on crypto (not legal tender, high-risk warnings), creating reputational and regulatory risk
- No segregation or insurance rules mean customer funds/keys may be treated as general assets in insolvency
- Extremely low level of crypto activity in Haiti means limited banking relationships, fiat on/off ramps, and market infrastructure
- If a future VASP-specific regulation is enacted, it may impose retroactive or transitional requirements that current operators cannot easily meet
- General AML framework (Loi 2013) was designed for traditional financial institutions — VASP-specific red-flag guidance is internally developed, not prescribed by law
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Loi du 11 novembre 2013 relative à la Lutte Contre le Blanchiment d'Argent et le Financement du Terrorisme (Law of November 11, 2013, relating to the Fight Against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism): This is the cornerstone of Haiti's AML/CFT framework. It defines money laundering and terrorist financing offenses, sets out reporting obligations for designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) and financial institutions, and establishes the powers of the UCREF.
Décret du 10 mars 2005 instituant l'Unité de Lutte Contre le Blanchiment d'Argent (Decree of March 10, 2005, instituting the Unit for the Fight Against Money Laundering): This decree established the UCREF as Haiti's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and outlined its structure and functions.
Obtaining and verifying the identity of natural persons (name, date of birth, address, nationality, official identification number – e.g., passport, national ID card).
Obtaining and verifying the identity of natural persons (name, date of birth, address, nationality, official identification number – e.g., passport, national ID card).
Using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information for verification.
Beneficial Ownership (BO): Identifying and taking reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of customers, including understanding the ownership and control structure of legal persons. This typically involves identifying individuals who own or control more than a certain percentage (e.g., 25%) of the entity, or who exercise control through other means.
Purpose and Nature of Business Relationship: Understanding the purpose and intended nature of the business relationship or transaction.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring the business relationship and transactions undertaken by customers to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including the source of funds where necessary.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): For higher-risk customers or transactions (e.g., Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), complex or unusually large transactions, customers from high-risk jurisdictions, or transactions involving privacy-enhancing virtual assets), VASPs must apply EDD measures, such as:
Obligation to Report: Reporting any transaction (or attempted transaction) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are the proceeds of a criminal activity or are related to terrorist financing, regardless of the amount.
"No Tipping-Off": Prohibiting the VASP or its employees from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR is being or has been filed.
Red Flags: Developing internal procedures to identify "red flags" specific to virtual assets that may indicate money laundering or terrorist financing (e.g., unusual transaction patterns, rapid transfers of large sums, use of mixers/tumblers, unexplained sources of funds, attempts to avoid CDD).
Customer Identification Records: All records obtained through CDD, including copies of identification documents.
Transaction Records: Details of all domestic and international transactions, including the amount, currency (both fiat and virtual asset type), date, method of payment, and the identities of the originator and beneficiary (including wallet addresses).
Analysis and STRs: Records of any analysis undertaken concerning suspicious transactions and copies of all STRs filed.
Retention Period: Records must generally be kept for a minimum of five (5) years after the business relationship ends or after the date of the transaction.
Unité Centrale de Renseignements Financiers (UCREF) - Financial Intelligence Unit:
Banque de la République d'Haïti (BRH):
Regulator Name: Banque de la République d'Haïti (BRH - Central Bank of Haiti)
Date: November 2021
Outcome: The communiqué served to officially inform the public and financial sector that cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender, are not regulated by the BRH, and their use carries significant risks (volatility, cyber-security, money laundering, and terrorist financing). It effectively discourages their use within the formal financial system and signals that anyone engaging with them does so at their own risk. It sets a cautious tone for the country's approach to digital assets.
Limited Framework: Haiti does not have a comprehensive legal or regulatory framework specifically for cryptocurrencies.
Central Bank Stance: The BRH maintains a cautious stance, primarily focusing on warning the public about risks and clarifying that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender.
Absence of Specific Enforcement: The lack of specific enforcement actions against crypto entities suggests either:
Focus on broader financial stability and anti-money laundering (AML) efforts, rather than specific crypto regulations.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- low
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS operations in Haiti lack a specific legal framework; general AML/CFT obligations under the Loi du 11 novembre 2013 apply with mandatory CDD, EDD, and STR reporting to UCREF, but the BRH's 2021 communiqué warns crypto is unregulated/not legal tender, creating significant legal uncertainty, and no custody license, segregation, insurance, or proof-of-reserves rules exist.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
- What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
- What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?