← Regulations / Iran / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Iran

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Iran with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Must comply with the Law on Combating Money Laundering (LCML) — initial 2008, amended 2019 — which establishes general AML obligations for reporting entities including VASPs if integrated into the financial system.
  • Must comply with the Law on Combating the Financing of Terrorism (LCFT) — enacted 2015, amended 2019 — requiring sanctions screening and suspicious transaction reporting.
  • Subject to Central Bank of Iran (CBI) directives on AML/CFT, including KYC, transaction monitoring, and reporting obligations for any entity authorized to deal with virtual assets.
  • KYC obligations: collect national ID number (National Code for Iranians), contact information (phone, email), verify through official documents (National ID card, passport).
  • For legal entities: collect legal name, trade name, registration number/date, legal form, registered address, principal place of business, details of directors/senior management/beneficial owners (25%+ ownership or controlling persons), verified through official corporate documents.
  • Suspicious transaction reporting to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) under the LCML.

Key Restrictions

  • Use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments is banned by the CBI — only import payments under strict governmental oversight are permitted.
  • Public trading of cryptocurrencies for retail speculative purposes is strongly discouraged, tightly regulated, or de facto illegal per the CBI.
  • Iran is on the FATF 'Public Statement – High-Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action', requiring enhanced due diligence and countermeasures from counterparties.
  • Iran is under extensive international sanctions (primarily US), prohibiting most financial transactions involving Iranian entities or individuals.
  • No comprehensive dedicated cryptocurrency licensing or tax law exists — legal framework is fragmented and evolving.
  • Mining is legal as industrial activity with ministry licensing; domestic exchange/trading has no clear comprehensive legal framework.

Key Risks

  • Extensive international sanctions (US-led) create severe obstacles for any VASP operating on-shore, including inability to access SWIFT, correspondent banking, and international crypto exchanges.
  • FATF blacklisting means foreign counterparties must apply enhanced due diligence or countermeasures, severely limiting cross-border transactions.
  • Regulatory ambiguity: no comprehensive crypto licensing law exists for VASPs — the legal basis for on-shore exchange operations is unclear and evolving on an ad-hoc basis.
  • Enforcement risk: active crackdowns on unlicensed crypto activities (mining seizures, arrests) signal that operating outside explicit government authorization carries severe penalties.
  • Tax uncertainty: no specific capital gains or income tax framework exists for crypto trading, creating ambiguity for VASP tax obligations and reporting.
  • PR/reputational risk: association with a jurisdiction under sanctions and FATF blacklisting may deter institutional partners, investors, and liquidity providers.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

aml 60% confidence

FATF Blacklisting: Iran is currently on the FATF's "Public Statement – High-Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action," meaning it is subject to a call for countries to apply enhanced due diligence and, in the most serious cases, countermeasures to protect the international financial system from the ongoing money laundering, terrorist financing, and proliferation financing (ML/TF/PF) risks emanating from Iran. This significantly impacts any international VASP's ability or willingness to operate in or with Iran.

aml 100% confidence

International Sanctions: Iran is under extensive international sanctions (primarily from the US), which prohibit most financial transactions involving Iranian entities or individuals, further complicating VASP operations.

aml 60% confidence

Evolving Domestic Stance: Iran's stance on cryptocurrencies has evolved from outright bans to allowing regulated mining and exploring the use of crypto for bypassing sanctions (e.g., import payments), while generally maintaining strict controls over public trading and use for domestic payments.

aml 60% confidence

Law on Combating Money Laundering (LCML):

aml 60% confidence

Legislation Name: "Law on Combating Money Laundering" (Qanun Mobaraze ba Pulshui), initially passed in 2008 and amended in 2019.

aml 60% confidence

Purpose: This is the foundational AML law in Iran, establishing general obligations for reporting entities (which would include any authorized financial service providers, including VASPs if fully integrated into the financial system).

aml 60% confidence

Key Provisions: Defines money laundering offenses, sets reporting obligations, establishes the Supreme Council for Combating Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism, and outlines the role of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

aml 60% confidence

Law on Combating the Financing of Terrorism (LCFT):

aml 60% confidence

Legislation Name: "Law on Combating Money Laundering" (Qanun Mobaraze ba Pulshui), initially passed in 2008 and amended in 2019.

aml 60% confidence

Purpose: Addresses the financing of terrorism. Any VASP, if operating, would be subject to its provisions, especially regarding sanctions screening and suspicious transaction reporting.

aml 90% confidence

Central Bank of Iran (CBI) Regulations and Directives:

aml 60% confidence

Early Stance (2018): The CBI initially banned all dealings in cryptocurrencies by banks and financial institutions, citing money laundering risks.

aml 60% confidence

Evolving Stance (2019-Present): The CBI later allowed cryptocurrency mining as an industrial activity, requiring miners to obtain licenses and sell their mined crypto to the CBI for import financing. However, the use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments is generally prohibited, and public trading platforms for major cryptocurrencies face significant restrictions or are not officially sanctioned in a broad retail sense.

aml 70% confidence

Applying Existing AML: The CBI's stance implies that any entity authorized to deal with virtual assets (e.g., licensed miners selling to CBI, or potentially future regulated exchanges) would be subject to existing AML/CFT laws and CBI directives regarding KYC, transaction monitoring, and reporting.

aml 60% confidence

Identification and Verification:

aml 60% confidence

National ID number (National Code for Iranians)

aml 90% confidence

Contact information (phone, email)

aml 60% confidence

Verification through official documents (e.g., National ID card, passport).

aml 90% confidence

Legal name and trade name

aml 60% confidence

Registration number and date

aml 60% confidence

Legal form (e.g., company, partnership)

aml 60% confidence

Registered address and principal place of business

aml 90% confidence

Details of directors, senior management, and beneficial owners (shareholders owning 25% or more, or controlling persons).

aml 60% confidence

Verification through official corporate documents (e.g., certificate of incorporation, articles of association).

tax 60% confidence

Banned for Domestic Payments: The Central Bank of Iran (CBI) has repeatedly banned the use of cryptocurrencies for domestic payments and transactions within Iran.

tax 60% confidence

Restrictions on Domestic Exchanges/Trading: While some local exchanges operate, individual trading and holding of cryptocurrencies are generally discouraged, tightly regulated, or even de facto illegal for retail investors for speculative purposes by the CBI. There is no clear legal framework for individuals to legally trade cryptocurrencies on a large scale.

tax 60% confidence

Legal for Imports (Under Specific Conditions): In 2022, Iran officially approved the use of cryptocurrencies for import payments as a way to circumvent international sanctions. This is typically for businesses and under strict governmental oversight.

tax 60% confidence

Status: Highly restricted, often considered illegal or at least strongly discouraged by the Central Bank for domestic speculative purposes. This makes a formal tax framework for individual gains largely moot.

tax 60% confidence

No Comprehensive Law: Iran does not have a comprehensive, dedicated "Cryptocurrency Tax Law" that details specific rates and rules for all virtual asset activities like some Western countries.

enforcement 60% confidence

Confiscation of equipment: Thousands of mining rigs (ASICs) have been confiscated, valued at millions of dollars collectively. For example, in June 2021, Tavanir announced the confiscation of 7,000 illicit mining machines.

enforcement 60% confidence

Arrests and Imprisonment: Individuals operating these farms often face arrest, fines, and potential prison sentences. Reports frequently mention dozens or hundreds of arrests during major campaigns.

tax 90% confidence

Regulated Mining: Crypto mining is recognized as a legal industrial activity in Iran but requires licenses from the Ministry of Industry, Mine and Trade and is subject to specific regulations, including higher electricity tariffs.

tax 60% confidence

Status: Legal, regulated industrial activity requiring licenses.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
low

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a locally-incorporated on-shore VASP may theoretically operate in Iran under existing AML/CFT laws and CBI directives, but faces extreme operational hurdles due to the absence of a comprehensive crypto licensing framework, a domestic ban on crypto for payments/public trading, FATF blacklisting, and extensive international sanctions that severely limit counterparty access and cross-border functionality.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?