← Regulations / Iceland / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Iceland

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Iceland with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Register as a VASP with the Central Bank of Iceland under Act on Measures Against Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing No. 140/2018 (transposing AMLD5/6).
  • Implement AML/CFT controls per the AML Act, including customer due diligence, beneficial ownership identification, and transaction monitoring.
  • Maintain records of transactions and beneficial owners for the period required by law.
  • Under the incoming MiCA regime (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114), obtain a full CASP authorization (a financial services license, not just AML registration) from the Central Bank of Iceland.
  • Meet prudential safeguard requirements under MiCA Article 66/67 and Annex IV (own funds/capital requirements or insurance policy) — amounts depend on nature, scale, and complexity of operations.
  • Strictly segregate client crypto-assets from the provider's own assets (MiCA Article 67, point 1).
  • Ensure timely return of clients' crypto-assets (MiCA Article 67).
  • Implement robust security policies and procedures per MiCA Article 67, point 2, including industry-leading practices (e.g., cold storage for most assets).

Key Restrictions

  • Must be locally incorporated and registered as a VASP with the Central Bank of Iceland.
  • Under the current AML-focused framework, only VASP registration is required — this is not a full financial license; MiCA will change this to a full CASP authorization.
  • Under MiCA, custody and administration of crypto-assets must be specifically authorized as a distinct crypto-asset service.
  • Client assets must be legally segregated from the VASP's own assets.
  • No specific insurance or bonding requirements currently mandated, but MiCA introduces prudential safeguard options (own funds or insurance).
  • No specific cold storage mandate under current law, but MiCA requires robust security policies implying cold storage for most assets.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory transition risk: Iceland is moving from a pure AML-registration regime to full MiCA authorization — operators must plan for re-authorization or top-up licensing.
  • No publicly announced enforcement actions in the last three years — limited regulatory precedent creates uncertainty about supervisory intensity.
  • Criminal cases involving crypto fraud/theft are handled by police/prosecutors, not the financial regulator — separate legal exposure beyond administrative compliance.
  • Under MiCA, prudential safeguard amounts depend on scale/complexity — unclear how Iceland's Central Bank will calibrate thresholds in practice.
  • MiCA implementation timeline in Iceland (as an EEA member) may involve additional national discretionary provisions.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

Regulator: The primary financial regulator is now the Seðlabanki Íslands (Central Bank of Iceland), which absorbed the functions of the former Financial Supervisory Authority (Fjármálaeftirlitið, FME) in January 2020. It is responsible for supervising financial undertakings, including those dealing with virtual assets, primarily from an AML/CFT perspective.

licensing 60% confidence

Focus: The Central Bank's focus has been on implementing AML/CFT regulations for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), aligning with FATF recommendations and EU directives. They require VASPs to register and comply with the AML/CFT Act.

licensing 60% confidence

No Publicly Announced Major Actions: Unlike larger countries where regulatory bodies regularly announce fines or other penalties against specific crypto firms for violations, Iceland has not had such public announcements in the last three years. This doesn't mean there are no regulatory activities, but rather that any actions taken may be less "significant" in the public domain (e.g., private warnings, compliance orders, or smaller, non-public fines) or against individuals rather than companies, or relate to older cases outside the requested timeframe.

licensing 60% confidence

Criminal Cases: While there haven't been public administrative actions from the financial regulator, criminal cases involving cryptocurrency fraud or theft can occur, handled by the police and prosecutors. However, such cases are typically against individuals for criminal offenses rather than administrative enforcement against a regulated entity, and no major, widely publicized criminal actions against a crypto company have emerged in the last 3 years that would fit "enforcement action" in the regulatory sense. The prominent "Cloud Mining" Ponzi scheme was investigated and prosecuted years ago, outside the specified 3-year window.

aml 60% confidence

VASP Registration: Any entity providing services related to virtual assets, including the safekeeping and/or administration of virtual assets on behalf of customers (i.e., custody), is required to register as a Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) with the Central Bank of Iceland. This is not a "license" in the traditional sense of financial services but rather an AML/CFT registration that imposes significant obligations.

aml 60% confidence

The registration is mandated by the Act on measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing No. 140/2018, which transposes EU AML Directives (AMLD5, soon AMLD6) into Icelandic law.

aml 60% confidence

Scope: This typically covers situations where the custodian holds private keys and has control over clients' virtual assets.

aml 60% confidence

Act on measures to combat money laundering and terrorist financing No. 140/2018: https://www.althingi.is/lagas/nuna/2018140.html (Icelandic original)

aml 60% confidence

While not explicitly detailed solely for crypto-asset custody in current Icelandic law, general principles of financial services and AML/CFT best practices would strongly suggest the need for segregation. VASPs are expected to maintain clear records of ownership and transactions, and commingling of funds/assets would violate these principles and increase AML/CFT risks.

aml 60% confidence

The AML Act requires VASPs to keep records of transactions and to identify beneficial owners, indirectly supporting the need for clear asset ownership distinctions.

aml 60% confidence

There are no specific insurance or bonding requirements mandated for crypto custodians under the current AML-focused VASP registration framework. General business insurance would be expected, but no specific prudential safeguards for crypto custody are prescribed.

aml 60% confidence

There are no specific legal mandates for the use of cold storage for crypto assets under current Icelandic law. However, robust security measures are expected as part of general operational risk management and AML/CFT compliance (e.g., preventing theft that could facilitate money laundering). Industry best practices for secure custody overwhelmingly recommend cold storage for the majority of assets.

aml 60% confidence

MiCA Authorization: Under MiCA, "custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients" is explicitly defined as a crypto-asset service (Article 3, point 16). Providers of this service will be required to obtain authorization from their competent national authority (in Iceland, likely the Central Bank of Iceland) to operate as a Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) (Article 59).

aml 60% confidence

This authorization is a full financial services license, distinct from the current AML registration.

aml 60% confidence

Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 on Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA): https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32023R1114

aml 60% confidence

Relevant Articles: Chapter 2 (Authorization and operating conditions for CASPs), specifically Article 59, and Chapter 3 (Obligations of CASPs), specifically Section 6 for custody.

aml 60% confidence

Mandatory Segregation: MiCA explicitly mandates strict segregation of client assets.

aml 60% confidence

Article 67 (Obligations of crypto-asset service providers providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients), point 1: "A crypto-asset service provider providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients shall ensure that the crypto-assets of its clients are segregated from its own assets and from the assets of other clients."

aml 60% confidence

It also requires making arrangements to ensure the timely return of clients' crypto-assets.

aml 60% confidence

Prudential Safeguards: MiCA (Article 66, point 10 and Article 67, point 7) requires CASPs to have robust prudential safeguards. These safeguards can take the form of:

aml 60% confidence

The amount of prudential safeguards depends on the services provided and the nature, scale, and complexity of operations, with specific thresholds set out in Annex IV.

aml 60% confidence

MiCA does not mandate cold storage specifically but requires CASPs to implement robust security measures for the safekeeping of crypto-assets.

aml 60% confidence

Article 67, point 2: "A crypto-asset service provider providing custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients shall establish, implement and maintain robust security policies and procedures regarding the access to, and the protection of, the crypto-assets, private cryptographic keys and, where applicable, the means of access to the crypto-assets of its clients."

aml 60% confidence

This implies that CASPs must adopt industry-leading security practices, which in most cases for the majority of assets, would involve cold storage or highly secure offline solutions.

aml 60% confidence

Under MiCA, an authorized Crypto-Asset Service Provider (CASP) that has obtained the specific authorization to provide "custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients" would essentially become the "qualified custodian." The authorization process ensures they meet the stringent capital, operational, security, governance, and organizational requirements laid out in MiCA.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP is permitted in Iceland but must first register under the AML/CFT Act No. 140/2018 with the Central Bank of Iceland, and will soon need to obtain a full CASP authorization under MiCA (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) with prudential safeguards, client asset segregation, and robust security policies.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?