← Regulations / Kazakhstan / Operating Models / Stablecoin issuer

Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Kazakhstan

Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Kazakhstan with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Licensed entity must adhere to AIFC AML Rules, aligned with FATF recommendations.
  • Customer screening against UN Security Council Consolidated List (sanctions, terrorism, WMD proliferation).
  • Must screen against OFAC SDN List if dealing with U.S. persons, USD transactions, or U.S. systems.
  • Must screen against EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List if interacting with EU persons or infrastructure.
  • Compliance with Law No. 191-IV 'On Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds and Financing of Terrorism' — the primary national AML/CFT statute.
  • AML/CFT oversight by both Financial Monitoring Agency (FMA) — the national FIU — and AFSA for AIFC-licensed entities.
  • Robust KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious transaction reporting obligations.

Key Restrictions

  • Issuance must occur within the AIFC (Astana International Financial Centre) legal regime under English common law.
  • Issuer must be incorporated as a legal entity within the AIFC, maintain a physical office there, and have key personnel (CEO, Compliance Officer) primarily based in the AIFC.
  • Stablecoin classified as a 'secured digital asset' under national law — must be backed by real assets or obligations; purely algorithmic stablecoins are likely prohibited or face significant regulatory hurdles.
  • Use of cryptocurrencies (including private stablecoins) for payments is prohibited outside the AIFC.
  • Digital Tenge (CBDC) is the primary official stable digital currency; private stablecoin regulation may tighten as CBDC rolls out.
  • Licensing likely requires a combination of Digital Asset Business license (issuance activity) and possibly PSP license (for fiat on/off-ramps), each with separate capital requirements.
  • Minimum capital requirements: USD 300,000 for Digital Asset Trading Facility or Custodian; USD 50,000–200,000 for PSP depending on tier.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: national law provides general principles for secured digital assets but does not specify granular reserve requirements (e.g., 1:1 fiat backing, independent audits, segregated accounts) — reliance on issuer disclosure and general consumer protection.
  • CBDC competition: the NBK is actively piloting the Digital Tenge, which may crowd out private stablecoins or lead to restrictive regulation.
  • Dual regime complexity: operating in the AIFC (English common law) vs. the rest of Kazakhstan (civil law) creates jurisdictional compliance risk.
  • Sanctions risk: exposure to overlapping UN, OFAC (extra-territorial), and EU sanctions regimes requiring multi-list screening.
  • Tax ambiguity: unclear treatment of stablecoin issuance and redemption events under CIT (20%) or IIT (10%), with limited guidance specific to stablecoins.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

stablecoin 60% confidence

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 278-VII ZRK dated June 24, 2023 "On Digital Assets in the Republic of Kazakhstan" (and subsequent amendments).

stablecoin 60% confidence

Secured Digital Asset: A digital asset that certifies property rights to specific goods, services, or property, including money, and is backed by real assets or obligations of the issuer.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Not classified as E-money/Payment Tokens: Stablecoins, under this law, are treated as a distinct category of digital assets, separate from electronic money as defined by the Law "On Payments and Payment Systems" or traditional payment tokens. E-money typically refers to digital representations of fiat currency issued by banks or licensed payment organizations.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Not classified as Securities: While some stablecoins could potentially be deemed "security tokens" if they grant specific investment rights (e.g., profit share, equity), most typical fiat-backed stablecoins are generally viewed as secured digital assets rather than traditional securities under this framework.

stablecoin 60% confidence

The national law provides general principles for secured digital assets, stating they must be backed by real assets or obligations. However, it does not specify granular reserve requirements (e.g., 1:1 fiat backing, independent audits, segregated accounts) for stablecoins specifically within the national jurisdiction. These specifics would likely be elaborated in subordinate legislation by the National Bank of Kazakhstan (NBK) or the Agency for Regulation and Development of Financial Market (ARDFM).

stablecoin 60% confidence

Issuers of such assets are responsible for ensuring the backing and disclosing information about it.

stablecoin 60% confidence

The national law requires licensing for activities related to digital assets, including the organization of trading platforms for digital assets, storage services, and issuance activities.

stablecoin 60% confidence

The National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Agency for Regulation and Development of Financial Market (ARDFM) are the primary regulators.

stablecoin 60% confidence

For secured digital assets, the law implies redemption rights by stating they certify property rights to underlying assets, including money. The specific mechanism for redemption would be defined by the issuer's terms and conditions, subject to the general principles of consumer protection and contractual law.

stablecoin 60% confidence

The national Law on Digital Assets does not explicitly address "algorithmic stablecoins." Given the general emphasis on "secured digital assets" being backed by real assets or obligations, purely algorithmic stablecoins (without tangible asset backing) would likely face significant regulatory hurdles or be outright disallowed. The regulatory focus is on tangible asset backing to ensure stability and protect users.

licensing 60% confidence

License Type: Operating a Digital Asset Trading Facility (DATF).

licensing 60% confidence

License Type: Providing Payment Services Provider (PSP) services.

licensing 60% confidence

Must be incorporated or established as a legal entity within the AIFC.

licensing 60% confidence

Maintain a physical office presence in the AIFC.

licensing 60% confidence

Have key personnel (e.g., CEO, Compliance Officer) primarily based in the AIFC.

licensing 60% confidence

Base Capital: This varies significantly based on the type and scope of the license.

licensing 60% confidence

Digital Asset Trading Facility (DATF): Typically USD 300,000 (or KZT equivalent) for non-dealing DATFs. If the DATF also acts as a Dealer, higher capital may be required.

licensing 60% confidence

Payment Services Provider (PSP): Varies depending on the specific payment services and tiers of authorization, ranging from USD 50,000 to USD 200,000 (or KZT equivalent) for higher-tier PSPs.

licensing 60% confidence

Adherence to AIFC AML Rules, which are aligned with FATF (Financial Action Task Force) recommendations.

aml 60% confidence

Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On Counteracting Legalization (Laundering) of Criminal Proceeds and Financing of Terrorism" (No. 191-IV dated August 28, 2009, as amended): This is the primary AML/CFT law. It designates the Financial Monitoring Agency (FMA) as the competent authority and outlines the obligations of "financial organizations" and other reporting entities (which, under FATF standards, includes VASPs). It requires reporting entities to identify customers, monitor transactions, and report suspicious activities, including those related to terrorism financing and proliferation, which often involves sanctions screening.

aml 60% confidence

Financial Monitoring Agency (FMA): The FMA is Kazakhstan's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and the primary body responsible for enforcing AML/CFT laws, including monitoring compliance with international sanctions.

custody 95% confidence

Mandatory Segregation: Licensed custodians are required to segregate client digital assets from their own proprietary assets. These assets must be clearly identifiable as client assets.

custody 95% confidence

Capital Requirements: Licensed firms must meet specific minimum capital requirements (financial resources) based on the nature and scale of their business, as detailed in the Prudential Rules. This serves as a buffer against operational losses.

tax 60% confidence

General Republic of Kazakhstan: The National Bank of Kazakhstan has historically maintained a cautious stance, stating that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender and are generally viewed as digital property or assets. The use of cryptocurrencies for payments is prohibited outside the AIFC.

tax 60% confidence

Astana International Financial Centre (AIFC): The AIFC operates under its own jurisdiction based on English common law and has a more progressive approach to digital assets. Within the AIFC, specific regulations allow for the operation of digital asset exchanges and other crypto-related activities under the supervision of the AIFC Financial Services Authority (AFSA). Here, digital assets are recognized as a specific class of assets.

tax 60% confidence

General Principle: Gains derived from the sale or exchange of digital assets are generally subject to Individual Income Tax (IIT). When a cryptocurrency is sold for a higher price than its acquisition cost, the difference is considered a capital gain.

tax 60% confidence

General Principle: Profits from the sale or exchange of digital assets are subject to Corporate Income Tax (CIT).

tax 60% confidence

VAT Exemptions: AIFC participants are generally exempt from VAT on the supply of financial services and certain other specified activities within the AIFC. This could extend to qualifying digital asset services.

tax 60% confidence

Potential Exemptions: The AIFC offers a more attractive tax regime. Participants (legal entities registered within the AIFC) may be exempt from CIT on certain income, including income from financial services and investment activities, for a period of up to 50 years. This could potentially include profits from qualifying digital asset activities, depending on the specific registration and nature of the activity. Individuals working in the AIFC also enjoy tax benefits. It is crucial to verify the specific conditions for these exemptions with the AFSA and a tax advisor.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Within the AIFC, stablecoins are most likely to be classified as "Asset-Referenced Tokens" or potentially "Security Tokens," depending on their specific design and the rights they convey.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Asset-Referenced Token: A token that purports to maintain a stable value by referencing other assets (e.g., fiat currency, commodities, or a basket of assets). This is the most common classification for fiat-backed stablecoins.

stablecoin 60% confidence

The National Bank of Kazakhstan and the Agency for Regulation and Development of Financial Market (ARDFM) are the primary regulators.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Interaction: The NBK has stated that the Digital Tenge aims to enhance payment efficiency and potentially integrate with innovative financial products. While private stablecoins are not explicitly prohibited, the CBDC will serve as the primary official stable digital currency. The NBK's future regulations may clarify the complementary or competitive roles of private stablecoins relative to the Digital Tenge. It's likely that private stablecoins, if allowed to operate broadly, would be subject to strict oversight to prevent systemic risks and ensure consumer protection, potentially requiring interoperability with the CBDC infrastructure.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — stablecoin issuance is permitted only within the AIFC special financial zone under a Digital Asset Business license (plus potentially a PSP license), requiring local incorporation, physical presence in the AIFC, minimum capital (USD 50k–300k depending on license type), full AML/CFT compliance, and backing by real assets, but national law lacks granular reserve and audit specifications, and the NBK's Digital Tenge CBDC may reshape the regulatory landscape.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
  • What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
  • What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
  • Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?