← Regulations / Sri Lanka / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in Sri Lanka

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Sri Lanka with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • General AML/CFT obligations under the Financial Transactions Reporting Act No. 6 of 2006 (FTRA) apply, including customer due diligence (CDD), record-keeping, and suspicious transaction reporting to the FIU.
  • CDD must include: full name, permanent address, date of birth, nationality, unique ID (NIC/passport) for individuals; legal name, form, proof of existence, and senior management details for legal persons.
  • Beneficial ownership identification and verification required for all customers (legal persons/arrangements).
  • Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and transactions to ensure consistency with customer risk profile.
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, high-risk jurisdictions, complex or unusually large transactions, and transactions involving new technologies/products.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) must be filed with the FIU for any transaction (regardless of amount) where there are reasonable grounds to suspect money laundering or terrorist financing.
  • No tipping-off prohibition applies — VASPs cannot disclose STR submissions to customers or third parties.
  • Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) may be applied only for lower-risk scenarios (e.g., small, low-value transactions) but entity must still identify the customer.

Key Restrictions

  • CBSL has publicly declared that VASPs are not licensed or regulated in Sri Lanka and has warned the public against engaging with cryptocurrencies and virtual asset services (2021 and 2022 press releases).
  • Engaging in or facilitating virtual asset transactions may violate Sri Lanka's foreign exchange regulations and payment laws, particularly regarding outward remittances for crypto purchases.
  • Any company operating in Sri Lanka must comply with the Companies Act No. 07 of 2007, requiring local incorporation or registration as an overseas company.
  • No specific VASP licensing framework exists yet — CBSL has been involved in discussions to develop one but has not finalized it.
  • Operating a custodial wallet/SaaS model requires navigating an unregulated/ambiguous legal status where CBSL has taken a prohibitive public stance.

Key Risks

  • High regulatory ambiguity — CBSL has issued strong public warnings (2021, 2022) declaring crypto services unregulated and warning against engagement, creating legal uncertainty for operators.
  • Potential violation of foreign exchange regulations — facilitating crypto transactions involving outward remittances could violate Sri Lanka's foreign exchange laws.
  • Enforcement precedent — CBSL's press releases serve as de facto enforcement actions, stating that engaging in crypto activities is 'a violation' of financial laws, though no specific monetary penalty framework exists.
  • No dedicated VASP licensing pathway exists, meaning operators would face uncertainty about whether their activities are lawful under existing financial laws.
  • Reputational and operational risk — CBSL has publicly discouraged financial institutions from engaging with VASPs, making banking relationships difficult to secure.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

The Prevention of Money Laundering Act, No. 5 of 2006 (PMLA): This Act criminalizes money laundering and establishes the legal framework for its prevention.

licensing 60% confidence

The Financial Transactions Reporting Act, No. 6 of 2006 (FTRA): This Act mandates reporting institutions (which would include regulated VASPs) to report suspicious transactions and sets out customer due diligence (CDD) and record-keeping requirements. It also established the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU).

licensing 60% confidence

Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) of Sri Lanka:

licensing 60% confidence

Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL):

licensing 60% confidence

Identification and Verification of Customers:

licensing 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer, including for legal persons, identifying natural persons who ultimately own or control the customer.

licensing 60% confidence

Purpose and Intended Nature of the Business Relationship: Understand the nature of the customer's activities and the purpose for which they intend to use the VASP's services.

licensing 60% confidence

Simplified Due Diligence (SDD): May be applied where the risk of money laundering or terrorist financing is lower (e.g., small, low-value transactions), but the VASP must still be able to identify the customer and monitor transactions.

licensing 60% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Must be applied in higher-risk situations, such as:

licensing 60% confidence

Customers from high-risk jurisdictions.

licensing 60% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and their family members/close associates.

licensing 60% confidence

Complex, unusually large transactions, or unusual patterns of transactions.

licensing 60% confidence

Transactions involving new products or business practices, and new technologies.

licensing 60% confidence

Ongoing Due Diligence:

licensing 60% confidence

Reporting Threshold: Any transaction (regardless of amount) or attempted transaction where there are reasonable grounds to suspect that it may be linked to money laundering, terrorist financing, or other criminal activities.

licensing 60% confidence

"No Tipping-Off": VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that a STR or related information is being or has been submitted to the FIU.

aml 40% confidence

Capital Requirements: No specific capital thresholds for VASP operations.

aml 40% confidence

AML/KYC Requirements (Specific to VASPs): No specific AML/KYC regulations are tailored for VASPs under a licensing framework. However, any entity operating in Sri Lanka would still be subject to general anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) laws, such as the Financial Transactions Reporting Act No. 6 of 2006 (FTRA), if their activities fall within the scope of "financial institutions" or "designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs)" and trigger reporting obligations for suspicious transactions. The applicability to purely virtual asset businesses without fiat gateways is a grey area in the absence of explicit VASP definitions in the FTRA.

aml 40% confidence

Reference: Financial Transactions Reporting Act No. 6 of 2006 (Note: This is a general AML/CFT law, not specific to VA licensing).

aml 40% confidence

Local Presence: While no specific VASP license mandates local presence, any company wishing to operate legally in Sri Lanka, regardless of its business type, would need to comply with the Companies Act No. 07 of 2007, which typically involves local incorporation or registration as an overseas company branch.

enforcement 60% confidence

Regulator Name: Central Bank of Sri Lanka (CBSL), Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)

enforcement 60% confidence

Entity Targeted: The general public and financial institutions in Sri Lanka, as well as any individuals or entities considering or engaging in virtual asset services. Violation Type: Operating outside the regulated financial framework; promoting/engaging in high-risk, unregulated investments; dealing in non-legal tender. Penalty Amount: No specific monetary penalty associated with this advisory itself. The "penalty" is the declaration of illegality/unregulated status and the implied risk of legal action under existing financial or criminal laws if related to fraud or money laundering.

enforcement 60% confidence

Outcome: Heightened public awareness of the CBSL's prohibitive stance. Discouragement of engagement with cryptocurrencies and virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Reiterated that VASPs are not licensed or regulated by CBSL.

enforcement 60% confidence

Significance: This was a strong and clear warning, setting the tone for the country's approach to virtual assets. It emphasized that crypto falls outside the existing regulatory perimeter, making any related activities high-risk and potentially illegal under broader financial laws.

enforcement 60% confidence

Central Bank of Sri Lanka Press Release: https://www.cbsl.gov.lk/en/news/fiu-statement-on-the-use-of-virtual-currencies

enforcement 60% confidence

Violation Type: Continuing to engage with or facilitate virtual asset transactions, despite previous warnings, and engaging in activities outside the regulatory framework. Penalty Amount: No specific monetary penalty. The "penalty" remains the official declaration of their unregulated status and the potential application of broader financial or criminal laws for illicit activities.

enforcement 60% confidence

Outcome: Reiteration of the prohibitive stance. Further clarification that facilitating or promoting cryptocurrencies is a violation of current foreign exchange regulations (especially related to outward remittances for crypto purchases) and payment laws.

enforcement 60% confidence

Significance: This further solidified the CBSL's position, clarifying that not only are cryptocurrencies unregulated, but engaging in transactions involving foreign exchange for crypto can violate the country's stringent foreign exchange laws. This acts as a stronger deterrent for financial institutions.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS operation in Sri Lanka is legally ambiguous: no VASP licensing framework exists, CBSL has issued prohibitive public warnings (2021, 2022) against crypto services, general AML/CFT laws (FTRA) apply, local incorporation is required under the Companies Act, and operators face significant regulatory and foreign-exchange law risk.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?