Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Latvia
Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.
Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Latvia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- EMT issuers must obtain authorization as a credit institution (bank) or electronic money institution (EMI) under Directive 2009/110/EC (E-money Directive), which extends to EMT issuance (lv.stablecoin.e-money-tokens-emts-only-credit)
- ART issuers (if not EMTs) must be authorized by Latvijas Banka as a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) for issuance of ARTs under MiCA, with robust governance, capital requirements, and operational conditions (lv.stablecoin.asset-referenced-tokens-arts-issuers-of)
- All VASPs (including stablecoin issuers) must register with the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU/Latvijas Banka) for AML/CTPF compliance under the Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism and Proliferation Financing (lv.stablecoin.law-on-the-prevention-of)
- AML obligations include: developing robust internal control systems, appointing an AML officer, conducting CDD/EDD, transaction monitoring, reporting suspicious transactions to the FIU, and record-keeping for at least 5 years (lv.licensing.amlctpf-internal-control-system-ics, lv.licensing.appointed-aml-officer, lv.licensing.client-due-diligence-cdd-and, lv.licensing.transaction-monitoring-systems-for-monitoring, lv.licensing.reporting-procedures-for-reporting-suspicious, lv.licensing.record-keeping-maintaining-records-for-a)
- Post-MiCA (from 30 Dec 2024 for CASPs generally): full authorization/license from Latvijas Banka, with prudential safeguards (capital requirements), strict segregation of client crypto-assets, organizational requirements, and detailed IT/security arrangements (lv.aml.requirement-under-mica-providing-custody, lv.aml.prudential-safeguards-capital-requirements, lv.aml.mandate-mica-explicitly-mandates-strict)
- DAC8 reporting obligations will apply (reporting EU client transaction data to tax authorities) (lv.tax.dac8-upcoming-as-an-eu)
Key Restrictions
- EMT issuers must be a credit institution (bank) or an electronic money institution (EMI) — not a standalone VASP registration suffices for EMT issuance (lv.stablecoin.e-money-tokens-emts-only-credit)
- The issuer must be a legal entity registered in Latvia with a registered office in Latvia (lv.licensing.the-applicant-must-be-a, lv.licensing.the-company-must-have-its)
- Reserve assets for EMTs must be held in credit institutions, segregated from the issuer's own assets, and invested in highly liquid, low-risk assets; fully backed 1:1 by fiat currency at all times (lv.stablecoin.issuers-must-maintain-reserve-assets, lv.stablecoin.these-reserve-assets-must-be, lv.stablecoin.they-must-be-fully-backed)
- ART issuers must maintain a separate reserve of assets sufficiently diversified, with a detailed reserve policy outlining investment, storage, and management (lv.stablecoin.issuers-must-maintain-a-reserve, lv.stablecoin.the-composition-of-the-reserve, lv.stablecoin.a-detailed-reserve-policy-is)
- Redemption rights holders must be granted — EMTs are fully backed 1:1 and redeemable at par; detailed reserve rules imply redemption rights (lv.stablecoin.they-must-be-fully-backed, lv.stablecoin.issuers-must-maintain-reserve-assets)
- Foreign-issued stablecoins (EMTs/ARTs) are subject to MiCA passporting and authorization rules; they cannot be offered to Latvian residents without proper authorization or recognition under MiCA
Key Risks
- Dual regulatory track: AML registration with FIU (current pre-MiCA) vs. full MiCA licensing from late 2024 — operators may face transitional ambiguity and need to prepare for the upgrade (lv.licensing.current-regime-pre-mica-registration-latvia, lv.licensing.future-regime-post-mica-licensing-once)
- No explicit segregation rules for client crypto-assets in the current AML framework, creating uncertainty until MiCA's strict segregation mandate takes full effect (lv.aml.current-status-under-the-current, lv.aml.mandate-mica-explicitly-mandates-strict)
- EMT vs. ART classification is determinative for the licensing pathway (EMI/bank vs. CASP authorization) — misclassification is a significant regulatory risk (lv.stablecoin.e-money-tokens-emts-these-are, lv.stablecoin.asset-referenced-tokens-arts-these-are)
- Corporate income tax applies at 20% on distributed profits; undistributed profits are untaxed but distributed profits bear effective ~25% tax — affects capital planning (lv.tax.tax-rate-on-distributed-profits, lv.tax.tax-system-latvia-has-a)
- VAT treatment of stablecoin issuance/exchange is complex — exchange of crypto for fiat is VAT-exempt, but other services (custody, wallet fees) are subject to 21% VAT (lv.tax.exchange-of-crypto-for-fiat, lv.tax.walletcustodial-services-services-like-maintaining)
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
E-money Tokens (EMTs): Only credit institutions (banks) or electronic money institutions (EMIs) authorized under the Directive 2009/110/EC (E-money Directive) can issue EMTs. The authorization under the E-money Directive extends to EMT issuance.
Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs): Issuers of ARTs (that are not EMTs) must be authorized by the competent authority (Latvijas Banka in Latvia) as a crypto-asset service provider (CASP) for the issuance of ARTs. The authorization process includes robust governance, capital requirements, and operational resilience.
Issuers must maintain reserve assets equivalent to the nominal value of all outstanding e-money tokens.
These reserve assets must be held in credit institutions, segregated from the issuer's own assets, and invested in highly liquid, low-risk assets.
They must be fully backed 1:1 by a fiat currency at all times.
Issuers must maintain a reserve of assets that is separate from their own assets and is managed in a way that aims to ensure the liquidity and stability of the ART.
The composition of the reserve assets must be sufficiently diversified in terms of assets and credit institutions.
A detailed reserve policy is required, outlining how assets are invested, stored, and managed.
E-money Tokens (EMTs): These are crypto-assets that purport to maintain a stable value by referencing the value of a single fiat currency, such as the Euro.
Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs): These are crypto-assets that are not e-money tokens and purport to maintain a stable value by referencing any other value or right, or a combination thereof, including one or several official currencies, one or several commodities, or one or several crypto-assets.
Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism and Proliferation Financing (Noziedzīgi iegūtu līdzekļu legalizācijas un terorisma un proliferācijas finansēšanas novēršanas likums): This law requires virtual asset service providers (VASPs), including exchanges and wallet providers, to register with Latvijas Banka and comply with AML/CFT obligations. While this doesn't authorize issuance, it's a prerequisite for operating in the crypto space in Latvia.
MiCA Regulation, specifically Articles 16-20 (for ART authorization) and Articles 48-50 (for EMTs).
Directive 2009/110/EC on the taking up, pursuit and prudential supervision of the business of electronic money institutions (E-money Directive).
Current Regime (Pre-MiCA): Registration. Latvia requires entities engaged in virtual asset services to register with the FIU. This registration is primarily an AML/CTPF compliance obligation, meaning the focus is on preventing money laundering and terrorist financing, rather than prudential supervision (e.g., capital adequacy for consumer protection, market integrity, etc., which is typical of a full licensing regime).
Future Regime (Post-MiCA): Licensing. Once MiCA fully applies to VASPs (expected December 2024), Latvia will transition to a comprehensive licensing regime under MiCA. This will involve more stringent requirements, including prudential safeguards, operational resilience, and specific disclosures, and will likely be overseen by the Bank of Latvia (FCMC).
The applicant must be a legal entity registered in Latvia (typically a Limited Liability Company – SIA).
The company must have its registered office in Latvia.
AML/CTPF Internal Control System (ICS):
Appointed AML Officer:
Client Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Procedures for identifying and verifying clients, beneficial owners, and monitoring business relationships.
Transaction Monitoring: Systems for monitoring transactions for suspicious activities.
Reporting: Procedures for reporting suspicious transactions to the FIU.
Record-keeping: Maintaining records for a specified period (typically 5 years).
Requirement: Under MiCA, providing "custody and administration of crypto-assets on behalf of clients" will require a full authorization (license) from the competent authority in the home Member State – in Latvia, this will be the Bank of Latvia (Latvijas Banka).
Prudential safeguards (capital requirements).
Mandate: MiCA explicitly mandates strict segregation of client crypto-assets.
Current Status: Under the current AML framework, there are no explicit, specific rules mandating the segregation of client crypto assets for non-bank VASPs. However, general good practice, risk management principles, and the expectation of investor protection inherent in financial services would strongly suggest that reputable custodians segregate client assets from their own operational funds. For traditional financial institutions providing crypto services, existing segregation rules for client funds/assets would generally apply.
Tax Rate on Distributed Profits: 20% of the gross dividend amount (or 25% of the net amount, calculated as 20/(1-0.20)).
Tax System: Latvia has a unique corporate income tax system where profit is taxed only when it is distributed (as dividends or deemed dividends). Undistributed profits (retained earnings) are generally not taxed.
Exchange of Crypto for Fiat (and vice versa): The exchange of virtual currencies for traditional (fiat) currencies and vice versa is considered a supply of services concerning currency, securities, and other financial instruments. These services are exempt from VAT under Article 135(1)(e) of the EU VAT Directive.
Wallet/Custodial Services: Services like maintaining crypto wallets, providing custodial services, or operating a crypto exchange (charging fees for trading) are generally subject to the standard VAT rate of 21%, unless they fall under a specific financial services exemption.
DAC8 (Upcoming): As an EU member state, Latvia will be implementing the EU's Directive on Administrative Cooperation in the Field of Taxation (DAC8). This directive will mandate crypto-asset service providers to report information on EU clients and their crypto-asset transactions to tax authorities, which will then be automatically exchanged between EU member states. This will significantly increase the data available to tax authorities regarding crypto activities.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — stablecoin issuance in Latvia is governed by MiCA: e-money tokens (EMTs) require authorization as a credit institution or electronic money institution (EMI) with 1:1 fiat backing and segregated reserves in credit institutions; asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) require Latvijas Banka authorization as a CASP with diversified reserve requirements; a locally-registered entity is mandatory, and foreign-issued stablecoins require MiCA authorization/passporting to be offered to Latvian residents.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
- What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
- What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
- Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?