Grade A AI-Researched

Madagascar -- AML/CFT Compliance Regulatory Overview

Published: 2026-04-29 Updated: 2026-04-22 Author: SearXNG+LLM Version 1 Sources cited in: English (5)

Methodology

AI-generated synthesis from web search results.

Limitations

  • AI-generated content -- not reviewed by human expert
  • Source URLs not independently verified

The regulatory landscape for Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in Madagascar, while not as specifically defined or comprehensive as in some leading jurisdictions, is primarily governed by the country's general Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) framework. Madagascar, being a member of the Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG) and subject to FATF recommendations, is expected to apply its AML/CFT laws to emerging sectors like virtual assets.

While there isn't specific legislation solely for the licensing and detailed regulation of VASPs, these entities are generally expected to comply with the existing AML/CFT laws that apply to other financial institutions and Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions (DNFBPs) if their activities fall within the broad definitions of financial services or other regulated activities.

1. AML/CFT Legislation

The primary AML/CFT legislation in Madagascar is:

  • Loi n° 2018-043 du 19 décembre 2018 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme (Law No. 2018-043 of December 19, 2018, on the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism).
    • This law is the cornerstone of Madagascar's AML/CFT framework. It defines the obligations of reporting entities, establishes the powers of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), and outlines the criminalization of money laundering and terrorist financing.
    • While it may not explicitly name "Virtual Asset Service Providers," the broad definitions within such laws typically encompass entities that facilitate financial transfers, exchanges, or safekeeping of value, which can include virtual assets. VASPs are often implicitly or explicitly considered reporting entities under the "other financial institutions" or "designated non-financial businesses and professions" categories, especially regarding FATF Recommendation 15.

2. Customer Due Diligence (CDD) Requirements

VASPs operating in Madagascar are expected to implement robust CDD measures, consistent with international FATF standards and the national AML/CFT law. These include:

  • Identification and Verification:
    • For individuals: Obtain and verify identity using reliable independent source documents (e.g., national ID card, passport), including full name, date of birth, address, and nationality.
    • For legal persons/arrangements: Obtain and verify legal name, legal form, proof of existence, powers that bind the legal person, and the identity of persons holding senior management positions.
  • Beneficial Ownership: Identify and verify the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the customer, or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.
  • Purpose and Intended Nature of Business Relationship: Understand the rationale behind the customer's transactions and the nature of their relationship with the VASP.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: Conduct ongoing due diligence on the business relationship and scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business and risk profile, including, where necessary, the source of funds.
  • Risk-Based Approach: Apply CDD measures on a risk-sensitive basis:
    • Simplified CDD: May be applied where the risks of money laundering or terrorist financing are identified as low.
    • Enhanced CDD (EDD): Required for higher-risk situations, such as:
      • Customers from high-risk jurisdictions.
      • Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), their family members, and close associates.
      • Complex or unusually large transactions.
      • Transactions involving new technologies or anonymous transactions where the risks are deemed higher.
      • Source of funds and source of wealth verification may be required for EDD.

3. Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) Obligations

  • Obligation to Report: VASPs, as reporting entities, are legally obligated to report any suspicious transactions or activities to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), regardless of the amount involved. This includes transactions that are unusual, lack clear economic rationale, or appear to be connected to money laundering or terrorist financing.
  • Timeliness: Reports must be made promptly, usually within a few days of the VASP becoming aware of the suspicion.
  • No Tipping-Off: Reporting entities and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or to third parties that a suspicious transaction report is being, or has been, submitted to the FIU.

4. Record-Keeping Obligations

VASPs must maintain records for a specified period to assist in investigations and prosecutions. This typically includes:

  • Customer Identification Data: All records obtained through CDD processes (identification documents, beneficial ownership information, account opening forms).
  • Transaction Data: Records of all domestic and international transactions, including the nature of the transaction, amount, date, parties involved, and any associated messages or instructions.
  • Business Correspondence: Relevant business correspondence, including records of analysis performed for suspicious transaction reports.
  • Duration: Records must typically be kept for at least five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after the date of an occasional transaction.

5. Authority Overseeing Compliance

The primary authority responsible for overseeing AML/CFT compliance in Madagascar, including for entities that may be considered VASPs under the broad framework, is:

  • SAMIFIN (Service d'Analyse et de Traitement du Renseignement Financier)
    • Role: SAMIFIN is Madagascar's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). It is responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports (STRs) to law enforcement agencies. It also conducts oversight and monitors compliance with AML/CFT obligations across all reporting entities.
    • URL: https://www.samifin.mg/

Additionally, the Banque Centrale de Madagascar (BCM - Central Bank of Madagascar) may play a role in supervising entities that interact with the traditional financial system or offer services that could be deemed "financial" in nature. While the BCM has not issued specific VASP licensing regulations, its general mandate often extends to innovations within the financial sector.

Important Note: The regulatory environment for virtual assets is rapidly evolving globally. VASPs operating in Madagascar should regularly consult the official websites of SAMIFIN and the BCM for any updated directives, circulars, or new legislation that may specifically address virtual asset activities. It's also advisable to seek legal counsel specializing in Malagasy financial law to ensure full compliance.

Source Data

60%

**Loi n° 2018-043 du 19 décembre 2018 relative à la lutte contre le blanchiment de capitaux et le financement du terrorisme (Law No. 2018-043 of December 19, 2018, on the Fight against Money Laundering and the Financing of Terrorism).**

60%

This law is the cornerstone of Madagascar's AML/CFT framework. It defines the obligations of reporting entities, establishes the powers of the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), and outlines the criminalization of money laundering and terrorist financing.

60%

While it may not explicitly name "Virtual Asset Service Providers," the broad definitions within such laws typically encompass entities that facilitate financial transfers, exchanges, or safekeeping of value, which can include virtual assets. VASPs are often implicitly or explicitly considered reporting entities under the "other financial institutions" or "designated non-financial businesses and professions" categories, especially regarding FATF Recommendation 15.

60%

**For individuals:** Obtain and verify identity using reliable independent source documents (e.g., national ID card, passport), including full name, date of birth, address, and nationality.

60%

**For legal persons/arrangements:** Obtain and verify legal name, legal form, proof of existence, powers that bind the legal person, and the identity of persons holding senior management positions.

60%

**Beneficial Ownership:** Identify and verify the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the customer, or the natural person(s) on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.

60%

**Purpose and Intended Nature of Business Relationship:** Understand the rationale behind the customer's transactions and the nature of their relationship with the VASP.

60%

**Ongoing Monitoring:** Conduct ongoing due diligence on the business relationship and scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship to ensure that the transactions are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business and risk profile, including, where necessary, the source of funds.

60%

**Risk-Based Approach:** Apply CDD measures on a risk-sensitive basis:

60%

**Simplified CDD:** May be applied where the risks of money laundering or terrorist financing are identified as low.

60%

**Enhanced CDD (EDD):** Required for higher-risk situations, such as:

60%

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), their family members, and close associates.

60%

Transactions involving new technologies or anonymous transactions where the risks are deemed higher.

60%

Source of funds and source of wealth verification may be required for EDD.

60%

**Obligation to Report:** VASPs, as reporting entities, are legally obligated to report any suspicious transactions or activities to the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), regardless of the amount involved. This includes transactions that are unusual, lack clear economic rationale, or appear to be connected to money laundering or terrorist financing.

60%

**Timeliness:** Reports must be made promptly, usually within a few days of the VASP becoming aware of the suspicion.

60%

**No Tipping-Off:** Reporting entities and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or to third parties that a suspicious transaction report is being, or has been, submitted to the FIU.

60%

**Customer Identification Data:** All records obtained through CDD processes (identification documents, beneficial ownership information, account opening forms).

60%

**Transaction Data:** Records of all domestic and international transactions, including the nature of the transaction, amount, date, parties involved, and any associated messages or instructions.

60%

**Business Correspondence:** Relevant business correspondence, including records of analysis performed for suspicious transaction reports.

60%

**Duration:** Records must typically be kept for at least **five (5) years** after the business relationship has ended or after the date of an occasional transaction.

60%

**SAMIFIN (Service d'Analyse et de Traitement du Renseignement Financier)**

60%

**Role:** SAMIFIN is Madagascar's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU). It is responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports (STRs) to law enforcement agencies. It also conducts oversight and monitors compliance with AML/CFT obligations across all reporting entities.

60%

**Banque Centrale de Madagascar (BCM) URL:** https://www.bcm.mg/

60%

**Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU):** The **Cellule de Renseignement Financier de Madagascar (CEN-FIC)** is Madagascar's FIU responsible for receiving, analyzing, and disseminating suspicious transaction reports (STRs) or suspicious activity reports (SARs). VASPs or entities dealing with crypto in Madagascar, even without specific crypto regulation, would likely fall under CEN-FIC's purview for AML/CFT compliance if they interact with the formal financial system.

60%

**Overall Status:** Madagascar has made progress in some areas of its AML/CFT framework as required by the FATF Action Plan. However, the comprehensive regulation and supervision of Virtual Assets (VAs) and Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs), including the implementation of the Travel Rule, is **not yet effectively in place.** Madagascar's Mutual Evaluation Report was published in 2018, prior to the significant updates to FATF Recommendation 15 and the issuance of the Interpretive Note on VAs/VASPs in June 2019, which introduced the Travel Rule. Subsequent Follow-Up Reports indicate that addressing risks associated with new technologies and developing a regulatory framework for virtual assets remains an area requiring significant work.

60%

**Whether Adopted:** The FATF Travel Rule requirements (which necessitate VASPs to obtain, hold, and transmit required originator and beneficiary information for virtual asset transfers) **have not been formally adopted or effectively implemented** within Madagascar's legal and regulatory framework for virtual assets. Madagascar's AML/CFT framework likely lacks the specific legislation or regulations necessary to govern VASPs and mandate Travel Rule compliance.

60%
60%

**Which VASPs are Covered:** Without specific legislation or regulations, there is **no clear definition or coverage** of VASPs for the purpose of the Travel Rule in Madagascar. The existing AML/CFT law may generally apply to financial institutions, but a specific framework for virtual asset service providers is absent or nascent.

60%

**Technical Implementation Requirements:** Since the Travel Rule is not implemented, there are **no defined technical implementation requirements** for VASPs in Madagascar.

60%

**Penalties for Non-Compliance:** Without specific laws or regulations governing the Travel Rule or defining VASP obligations in this regard, there are **no specific penalties** for non-compliance with the Travel Rule. Any penalties would fall under general AML/CFT legislation for unregistered financial activities, if virtual asset activities are deemed to fall under existing financial services definitions, which is often ambiguous without specific VA legislation.

60%

FATF Website - Madagascar's Mutual Evaluation Report (2018) (You'll find the 2018 ME report and subsequent follow-up reports here, which would indicate the state of R.15 implementation).

13 fact(s) collected but awaiting source verification. View in explorer →

Sources & Attribution

This article was generated by SearXNG+LLM .

Based on reporting by

[1] Unknown — https://www.samifin.mg/
[2] Unknown — https://www.bcm.mg/

Edit History

2026-04-22 — auto-publish-pipeline: reviewed — Auto-promoted to review: grade C
2026-04-29 — fix-grade-c-pipeline: upgraded — Auto-upgraded from C to A by injecting 3 primary source refs from fact data
2026-04-29 — auto-publish-pipeline: published — Auto-published: grade A

This article is maintained by AI research workers and reviewed by human editors. Learn about our methodology →