← Regulations / Netherlands / Operating Models / CEX

Centralized exchange in Netherlands

Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

CEX is conditionally permitted in Netherlands with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • CASP authorization under MiCA via DNB/AFM — requires substantial UBO integrity screening, fit-and-proper tests, business plans, and policies
  • KYC obligations under WWFT (Dutch Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act) — identity verification for customers
  • Transaction monitoring under WWFT
  • Suspicious activity reporting (unusual transactions) to DNB under WWFT
  • Travel Rule applies with EUR 0 threshold (no minimum) — beneficiary and originator information must accompany all transfers under TFR recast
  • DNB maintains register of crypto service providers and oversees AML/CFT compliance under Wwft
  • Sanctions Act compliance monitored by DNB

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain CASP authorization under MiCA via AFM (market conduct) and DNB (AML/CFT) — transitional period for existing operators ended June 30, 2025
  • Custody of user assets is a licensed MiCA activity — CASP authorization required to hold client funds/crypto
  • Must pass rigorous UBO (Ultimate Beneficial Owner) integrity screening
  • EMTs (e-money tokens) can only be issued by licensed credit institutions or EMIs
  • ARTs (asset-referenced tokens) require a new dedicated license (unless already a licensed credit institution)
  • If listed crypto qualifies as a financial instrument or e-money, the Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wft/FSA) also applies

Key Risks

  • Pre-MiCA DNB registration had ~90% rejection rate — DNB's rigorous integrity screening signals high bar even under MiCA
  • Strict enforcement precedent: fines imposed on unregistered platforms (e.g., Binance, Coinbase) — serious non-compliance risk
  • Several exchanges have withdrawn from the Netherlands due to regulatory burden
  • Operating without proper CASP authorization post-transition (after June 30, 2025) carries risk of fines/imprisonment under WWFT

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 70% confidence

DNB — VASP registration (~90% rejection rate pre-MiCA), AML/CFT supervision

licensing 70% confidence

AFM — Market conduct, CASP authorization under MiCA

licensing 20% confidence

MiCA Regulation (EU) (2023) — CASP authorization, comprehensive crypto regulation

licensing 20% confidence

WWFT (Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act) (2018) — Pre-MiCA VASP AML registration with DNB — rigorous WWFT compliance

licensing 20% confidence

VASP: CASP authorization under MiCA via DNB/AFM. Pre-MiCA DNB registration had ~90% rejection rate. Substantial UBO integrity screening. Several exchanges withdrew from Netherlands.

licensing 20% confidence

CUSTODY: CASP authorization — custody is a licensed MiCA activity

licensing 20% confidence

EXCHANGE: CASP authorization under MiCA; rigorous UBO integrity screening

licensing 20% confidence

AFM: Licenses and supervises crypto-asset service providers under MiCAR; opened its digital portal for MiCAR license applications as of April 22, 2024

licensing 20% confidence

DNB: Maintains the register of crypto service providers and oversees AML/CFT compliance under the Wwft

licensing 40% confidence

Transitional period ended June 30, 2025: Existing CASPs could operate under prior rules while applying for MiCA licenses; only licensed entities allowed post-transition.

licensing 40% confidence

De Nederlandsche Bank (DNB): Central bank; handles AML/CTF registration for crypto service providers (exchanges, custodians), monitors compliance, supervises stablecoin issuers under MiCA, and enforces Wwft/Sanctions Act. Requires fit-and-proper tests, business plans, and policies for registration.

licensing 40% confidence

Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM): Supervises conduct, handles MiCA license applications/notifications for CASPs (opened portal April 22, 2024), and applies Financial Supervision Act (Wft) if crypto qualifies as financial instruments.

licensing 40% confidence

Wwft (Dutch Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorist Financing Act): Implements 5AMLD (effective May 21, 2020); mandates DNB registration for exchanges and custodian wallets, with KYC, transaction monitoring, and suspicious activity reporting. Non-compliance risks fines/imprisonment.

licensing 40% confidence

Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCA/MiCAR): EU-wide (enacted 2024, licenses effective December 30, 2024); AFM processes applications, promotes transparency; DNB focuses on stablecoins.

licensing 40% confidence

Dutch Financial Supervision Act (Wft/FSA): Applies if crypto is a security or e-money.

licensing 40% confidence

Legal and encouraged with oversight: Trading/owning crypto permitted; providers must register with DNB (pre-MiCA) or obtain AFM MiCA licenses post-2025. AFM advises new providers to apply directly for MiCA rather than DNB registration.

licensing 40% confidence

Strict enforcement: Fines on unregistered platforms (e.g., Binance, Coinbase).

licensing 40% confidence

Crypto-friendly: Clear framework supports innovation while aligning with EU norms.

licensing 40% confidence

AFM MiCA portal: Referenced in CMS guide (applications since April 2024).

travel-rule 20% confidence

Travel Rule adopted — threshold: EUR 0 (no threshold under TFR recast)

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a centralized exchange can operate in the Netherlands only after obtaining a CASP authorization under MiCA via AFM/DNB, with rigorous integrity screening, WWFT AML/CFT compliance, zero-threshold Travel Rule obligations, and custody as a licensed activity.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What exchange / VASP license applies?
  • What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
  • What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
  • What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?