← Regulations / Oman / Operating Models / Stablecoin issuer

Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Oman

Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in Oman with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Customer Identification and Verification (ID&V) under Royal Decree No. 30/2016 and Ministerial Decision No. 63/2016 — collect name, address, date of birth, nationality, unique ID number from government-issued ID.
  • Beneficial Ownership Identification — identify and verify natural persons owning/controlling 25%+ of the entity.
  • Understanding Purpose and Intended Nature of Business Relationship — gather info on anticipated activity, source of funds, and purpose of virtual asset transactions.
  • Ongoing Scrutiny of Transactions — monitor consistency with customer knowledge, business, and risk profile; keep CDD documents up-to-date.
  • PEP Screening — implement procedures to determine PEP status, apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) including senior management approval for establishing relationships.
  • Sanctions Screening — screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN, OFAC).
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for higher-risk categories — non-face-to-face relationships, complex ownership structures, high-value transactions, cross-border correspondent virtual asset relationships, high-risk jurisdictions.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) — file promptly with Oman Financial Intelligence Unit (OMAFIU) if funds are suspected proceeds of crime or related to terrorism financing.
  • No Tipping-Off — prohibited from disclosing to customer or any third party that an STR is being submitted or an investigation is conducted.
  • Recordkeeping — maintain transaction records (origin/destination, amount, date, type), CDD records, and correspondence; records must be kept for at least 10 years under FATF-aligned standards.

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain a relevant license from either CBO (as a Payment Service Provider or Electronic Money Institution if classified as e-money) or CMA (as an investment firm if classified as a security) under the CMA Virtual Assets Regulatory Framework (2023).
  • If classified as e-money, stablecoin must be fully backed by fiat reserves held in segregated accounts with reputable financial institutions; redemption at par must be offered.
  • Algorithmic or unbacked stablecoins are de facto prohibited — the CBO's cautious stance would make issuance by regulated entities practically impossible.
  • Must comply with the CMA's Virtual Assets Regulatory Framework (2023), which governs issuance, listing, and trading of virtual assets including stablecoins.
  • Foreign-issued stablecoins face legal uncertainty — no explicit permission for use locally; may be subject to classification as securities or e-money with attendant licensing requirements.
  • A local Omani entity (incorporation) is required to obtain the necessary financial service license from CBO or CMA.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity — no dedicated stablecoin regulation exists; classification as e-money vs. securities vs. virtual assets is unresolved and subject to interpretation by two separate regulators (CBO and CMA).
  • Competition risk from Omani CBDC — CBO has expressed interest in a CBDC, which could reduce demand for private stablecoins or create a regulatory blueprint that may not favor private issuance.
  • Enforcement risk — CBO has issued public warnings against virtual currencies; operating without explicit regulatory clarity exposes the issuer to potential enforcement actions.
  • AML/CFT compliance gap risk — strict FATF-aligned obligations apply via Royal Decree No. 30/2016, and any gap in customer screening, STR filing, or recordkeeping carries criminal liability risk.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

stablecoin 60% confidence

Central Bank of Oman (CBO): Regulates banking, payment systems, and e-money. Its purview would cover stablecoins that function as a means of payment or stored value.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Capital Market Authority (CMA): Regulates securities, capital markets, and investment products. Its purview would cover stablecoins that qualify as securities.

stablecoin 60% confidence

E-money/Payment Tokens: If a stablecoin is backed 1:1 by a fiat currency, issued by a regulated entity, and primarily used for payments or as a store of value, the CBO would likely treat it under its existing framework for Payment Systems Law or future specific e-money regulations. This would align with international standards where such stablecoins are often viewed similarly to e-money.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Securities: If a stablecoin grants rights similar to traditional securities (e.g., rights to profits, ownership in an enterprise, or a promise of return beyond simple redemption at par), or if it represents an investment contract, the CMA would likely classify it as a security under the Securities Law.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Virtual Assets (General): Regardless of their specific functional classification, stablecoins would be considered "virtual assets" under the Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) Law. This means any entity dealing with them would be subject to stringent AML/CFT obligations.

stablecoin 60% confidence

CBO's general stance on Virtual Assets: While specific regulations for stablecoins are pending, the CBO has issued warnings and statements regarding the risks associated with virtual assets. Direct CBO regulations on "Virtual Assets" are anticipated or under development, but a specific "Stablecoin Act" is not yet published.

stablecoin 60% confidence

By Analogy (E-money): If a stablecoin were classified as e-money under the CBO's purview, then existing or future regulations for e-money issuers would likely require full backing of issued e-money with safeguarding requirements, ensuring that customer funds are held in segregated accounts with reputable financial institutions. This is a common practice for e-money regulations globally.

stablecoin 60% confidence

By Analogy (Securities): If classified as a security, disclosure requirements under CMA regulations would necessitate clear information about the backing assets, their custody, and regular audits.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Financial Service Licenses: Depending on the classification, an entity issuing a stablecoin would likely require a relevant financial service license from either the CBO or the CMA:

stablecoin 60% confidence

CBO: A license as a Payment Service Provider (PSP) or an Electronic Money Institution (EMI) if the stablecoin functions as e-money.

stablecoin 60% confidence

CMA: A license as an investment firm or a financial services company if the stablecoin is deemed a security.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Fintech Regulatory Sandbox: The CBO has established a Fintech Regulatory Sandbox. Companies wishing to experiment with innovative financial technologies, including potentially stablecoins, can apply to operate within this controlled environment. This allows for testing and observation under CBO supervision before full regulatory frameworks are in place.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Payment Systems Law (CBO): Royal Decree No. 8/2021 Promulgating the Payment Systems and Settlement Law. (Specific details on e-money issuer licensing would be in associated regulations/circulars by the CBO).

stablecoin 60% confidence

By Analogy (E-money): If regulated as e-money, issuers would be obliged to redeem the e-money at par value with the underlying fiat currency upon request, subject to any fees disclosed. This is a fundamental principle of e-money regulation.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Contractual Rights: Redemption rights would primarily be governed by the terms and conditions set forth by the stablecoin issuer in their user agreements. These agreements would be subject to Omani contract law and consumer protection laws.

stablecoin 60% confidence

General Caution: The CBO's cautious stance on virtual assets generally would likely extend to a strong disinclination towards unbacked or algorithmically-backed stablecoins, which inherently carry higher volatility and systemic risks.

stablecoin 60% confidence

De Facto Prohibition: Without explicit rules, the existing requirement for full backing or stringent capital requirements for regulated financial instruments would likely make the issuance of algorithmic stablecoins by regulated entities practically impossible.

licensing 60% confidence

CMA Announcement: CMA Oman News - Issuance of Virtual Assets Regulatory Framework (This link might change or be archived; search CMA Oman for "Virtual Assets Regulatory Framework 2023")

licensing 60% confidence

Central Bank of Oman (CBO): The CBO has previously issued warnings regarding the risks of virtual currencies. However, in parallel with the CMA, it has also been working on developing its own regulatory framework for digital assets, particularly concerning digital currencies and payments.

licensing 60% confidence

Royal Decree No. 30/2016 on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT Law), amended by Royal Decree No. 112/2020: This is the foundational law for AML/CFT in Oman. While it predates explicit crypto regulations, its broad definitions of "funds," "financial institutions," and "financial activities" are intended to encompass new technologies and virtual assets once they fall under a regulated scope. VASPs, once licensed, will be designated as financial institutions or designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) under this law.

aml 60% confidence

Royal Decree No. 30/2016 (Law on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing): This is the foundational AML/CFT law in Oman, outlining the obligations for financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs).

aml 60% confidence

Ministerial Decision No. 63/2016 (Implementing Regulations of the Law on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorism Financing): This decision provides detailed regulations and guidelines for implementing Royal Decree 30/2016.

aml 60% confidence

Identification and Verification (ID&V) of Customers:

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership Identification:

aml 60% confidence

Understanding the Purpose and Intended Nature of the Business Relationship:

aml 60% confidence

Conducting ongoing scrutiny of transactions undertaken throughout the course of the business relationship to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile.

aml 60% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs):

aml 60% confidence

Screening customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN, OFAC).

aml 60% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD):

aml 60% confidence

Obligation to Report: If a VASP knows, suspects, or has reasonable grounds to suspect that funds are proceeds of a criminal activity or are related to terrorism financing, it must promptly file a Suspicious Transaction Report (STR) with the Oman Financial Intelligence Unit (OMAFIU).

aml 60% confidence

No Tipping-Off: VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR is being, or has been, submitted, or that an investigation is being conducted.

aml 60% confidence

Transaction Records: All records of domestic and international transactions, including information on the origin and destination of the funds/virtual assets, transaction amount, date, and type.

aml 60% confidence

CDD Records: Records of all information obtained through the CDD process (identification data, beneficial ownership information, business relationship purpose, etc.).

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a stablecoin issuer may operate in Oman only after obtaining the appropriate license (CBO as e-money/PSP or CMA as investment firm under the 2023 Virtual Assets Framework), establishing a local entity, fully backing the coin with segregated reserves, offering redemption at par, and complying with FATF-aligned AML/CFT obligations under Royal Decree No. 30/2016; however, the lack of a dedicated stablecoin regulation creates significant classification ambiguity and enforcement risk.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
  • What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
  • What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
  • Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?