Crypto-funded debit card in Panama
A card program where customer fiat balances are funded from crypto holdings, typically through an off-ramp at point of sale or top-up.
Crypto debit card is conditionally permitted in Panama with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- VASPs (including those offering crypto-to-fiat conversion for card programs) must register with the Superintendencia de Bancos de Panamá (SBP) for licensing and AML/CFT oversight under Law 1 of 2024.
- Customer identification and verification using reliable, independent source documents (government-issued ID, proof of address) for individual cardholders.
- For legal entities: verify legal name, form, proof of existence, directors/partners, and beneficial owners (ultimately owning > specified threshold).
- Understand the purpose, nature, and expected transaction types of the business relationship; gather source of funds/wealth information.
- Ongoing monitoring of transactions for consistency with customer risk profile; scrutinize complex, unusual large transactions.
- Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, customers from high-risk FATF jurisdictions, high-value/complex transactions.
- Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) must be filed with the Unidad de Análisis Financiero (UAF) for any transaction where there are reasonable grounds to suspect ML/TF — no threshold.
- No tipping-off: prohibited from disclosing to customer or third party that an STR has been or will be submitted.
- Record-keeping: at least 5 years after termination of business relationship or transaction date.
- Simplified Due Diligence (SDD) permitted only in clearly defined low-risk scenarios.
Key Restrictions
- Crypto is not legal tender in Panama and is not regulated as such by the SBP; no deposit insurance applies.
- Crypto-to-fiat conversion in a debit card program likely triggers SBP VASP licensing under Law 1 of 2024, which is now the primary regulatory framework.
- The card issuer/program manager must be incorporated under Panamanian law and obtain a general business license (Aviso de Operación) from the Ministry of Commerce and Industries.
- If the program involves holding significant fiat balances for clients or offering services that mimic traditional banking, a banking license under Law Decree 2 of 2008 may be required (highly stringent).
- Partner-bank / BIN-sponsor arrangements are required — the SBP has repeatedly warned regulated banks against involvement with unlicensed crypto activities, so a licensed VASP structure is necessary to secure banking partners.
- If the crypto asset used for funding is deemed a 'security' under Law Decree 1 of 1999, additional securities broker-dealer licensing from the SMV would apply.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity: no specific crypto VASP capital requirements exist yet, but the SBP's new authority under Law 1 of 2024 creates uncertainty about exact licensing conditions until implementing regulations are issued.
- Banking partner risk: Panamanian banks are cautious due to SBP warnings against crypto; securing a BIN sponsor or partner bank may be very difficult without a fully licensed status.
- Potential SBP enforcement for operating without proper authorization — the SBP has publicly warned that crypto activities are not supervised by them, creating a gap that Law 1 of 2024 aims to fill.
- Ongoing FATF scrutiny on Panama's AML/CFT framework means regulators may take aggressive enforcement against perceived gaps.
- Failed Bill 697 (2022 veto) shows political ambivalence — future legislative changes could materially alter the operating environment.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No Crypto-Specific Licensing Regime: As of late 2023 / early 2024, there is no specific "virtual asset license" in Panama issued by a dedicated crypto regulator.
Be incorporated under Panamanian law (Public Registry).
Obtain a business license ("Aviso de Operación") from the Ministry of Commerce and Industries.
Comply with general tax and labor laws.
Primary Relevance: This is the most likely regulator to assert jurisdiction over virtual asset activities, mainly for AML/CFT compliance. Panama is a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and is committed to implementing its recommendations, which include regulating VASPs for AML/CFT purposes.
Applicability: Exchanges, custody providers, and payment processors dealing with virtual assets are highly likely to be considered "Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions" (DNFBPs) or fall under an extended interpretation of "financial activities" for AML purposes.
Requirement: While not a "license," these entities would need to register with the SSNF for AML/CFT oversight and comply with all associated requirements.
Regulatory Reference: Law 23 of 2015 (Ley 23 de 2015, que adopta medidas para prevenir el blanqueo de capitales, el financiamiento del terrorismo y el financiamiento de la proliferación de armas de destrucción masiva). This law designates certain entities as "obligated subjects" (sujetos obligados) for AML/CFT purposes. While it doesn't explicitly name "VASPs," its broad scope and subsequent interpretations can cover them.
Relevance: Less likely to directly regulate pure crypto activities unless they involve fiat currency in a way that resembles traditional banking or payment services.
Applicability: If an exchange, custody provider, or payment processor holds significant fiat balances for clients, offers fiat-to-crypto conversion with a "trust" element, or provides services that closely mimic those of licensed financial institutions (e.g., issuing payment instruments that are essentially fiat-backed digital money), the SBP might assert jurisdiction. This is a high bar, as the SBP primarily regulates licensed banks and financial groups.
Requirement: A banking license or a license as a specific type of financial institution would be required, which is highly stringent.
Regulatory Reference: Law Decree 2 of 2008 (Decreto Ley No. 2 de 2008, que regula la actividad bancaria en Panamá).
No specific crypto VASP capital requirements.
General corporate capitalization requirements apply for company formation.
If classified under securities or banking laws, significant capital requirements would apply (e.g., millions for a bank, hundreds of thousands for certain securities brokers).
Law 23 of April 27, 2015 (Ley 23 de 27 de abril de 2015): This is the foundational AML/CFT law in Panama. It adopted measures to prevent money laundering, financing of terrorism, and financing of the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. It established the Financial Analysis Unit (UAF) and defined "obligated subjects" (sujetos obligados), which, through subsequent interpretations and amendments, have come to include VASPs. This law sets general obligations for customer due diligence, suspicious transaction reporting, and record-keeping.
Executive Decree 44 of April 15, 2016 (Decreto Ejecutivo N° 44 de 15 de abril de 2016): This decree complements Law 23, providing detailed regulations for its application, including specific procedures for due diligence, risk assessment, and internal controls for obligated subjects.
Law 1 of January 5, 2024 (Ley No. 1 de 5 de enero de 2024): This is the most crucial and recent piece of legislation specifically for virtual assets. It amends Law 23 of 2015 and other related laws to define virtual assets and virtual asset service providers (VASPs), establish a licensing and supervision regime, and explicitly subject VASPs to AML/CFT obligations under the supervision of the Superintendency of Banks of Panama (SBP). This law ensures Panama's compliance with FATF Recommendation 15 on new technologies and VASPs.
Superintendencia de Bancos de Panamá (SBP) - Superintendency of Banks of Panama:
Unidad de Análisis Financiero (UAF) - Financial Analysis Unit of Panama:
Identification and Verification:
For Individuals: Obtaining and verifying the identity of the customer and beneficial owner (if different from the customer) using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information (e.g., government-issued ID, passport, proof of address).
For Legal Entities/Arrangements: Obtaining and verifying the legal name, legal form, proof of existence, powers that regulate and bind the entity, names of relevant persons (directors, partners), and the identity of beneficial owners (those ultimately owning or controlling more than a specified percentage, typically 10% or 25%).
Understanding the Purpose and Nature of the Business Relationship: Gathering information on the customer's financial activities, expected transaction types, and the source of funds/wealth.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitoring the business relationship and transactions to ensure consistency with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes scrutinizing complex, unusual large transactions, and all unusual patterns of transactions that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Applying EDD measures for high-risk customers, business relationships, or transactions, which include:
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and their family members and close associates.
Customers from high-risk jurisdictions identified by FATF or local authorities.
High-value or complex transactions.
Obligation to Report: VASPs are legally obligated to report any suspicious transaction or activity to the UAF, regardless of the amount. A transaction is suspicious if the VASP has reasonable grounds to suspect that it may be related to money laundering, terrorism financing, or other illicit activities.
No Tipping-Off: VASPs, their employees, and officers are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that an STR has been or will be submitted.
Duration: Records must typically be kept for at least five (5) years after the business relationship has ended or after the date of the transaction.
Focus on AML/CFT: Panama was on the FATF grey list until October 2023, which heavily emphasized improving its Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Financing of Terrorism (AML/CFT) regime. While this pressure indirectly affects crypto (as it's a known vector for financial crime), direct, high-profile enforcement actions against crypto entities with specific fines haven't been widely publicized as a result.
SBP Circulars and Statements on Crypto Risks:
The SBP has repeatedly issued statements clarifying that cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in Panama, are not regulated by the SBP, and entities under its supervision (banks) should exercise extreme caution and assess risks related to crypto assets. They have warned against financial institutions engaging in crypto activities without proper risk management and adherence to existing AML/CFT regulations.
Failed Cryptocurrency Law (Bill 697):
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a crypto-funded debit card program in Panama requires incorporation as a Panamanian entity, registration/licensing with the Superintendencia de Bancos de Panamá (SBP) under Law 1 of 2024 as a VASP, a general business license (Aviso de Operación), full AML/CFT compliance under Law 23 of 2015, and likely a partner-bank/BIN sponsor arrangement that itself requires the operator to be duly licensed; if the program involves holding significant fiat client balances, a full banking license under Law Decree 2 of 2008 may also be required.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What e-money / payment-institution license is required?
- How is the crypto-to-fiat conversion regulated?
- What KYC and AML obligations apply to cardholders?
- What partner-bank or BIN-sponsor arrangements are required?