On-shore VASP in Peru
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Peru with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and low licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Low
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Register as a regular company in Peru (no dedicated VASP license regime exists).
- Register as an 'obligated subject' with UIF-Perú under Ley N° 27693 and its regulations (Decreto Supremo N° 020-2017-JUS).
- Implement a full AML/CFT compliance program as required by Resolución SBS N° 893-2019, which explicitly designates VASPs as obliged entities.
- Appoint a compliance officer responsible for AML/CFT matters.
- Perform Customer Due Diligence (CDD) — identify and verify customers using reliable independent source documents (national ID, passport, business registration).
- Identify and verify beneficial ownership of legal entity customers.
- Conduct Ongoing Monitoring of business relationships and transactions for unusual or suspicious patterns.
- Perform Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for: high-risk jurisdictions, PEPs and their family members/close associates, significant-value virtual-asset transactions, transactions with unusual patterns.
- Report Suspicious Transactions (ROS) to UIF-Perú.
- Maintain records of transactions and customer data (duration not specified in provided facts but standard under AML law).
- Conduct a comprehensive money-laundering/terrorist-financing risk assessment.
- Establish internal policies, procedures, and training programs for AML/CFT.
Key Restrictions
- No dedicated VASP licensing regime — operator must operate under general commercial law as a standard Peruvian company.
- If the VASP facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat conversions, it risks being deemed a financial intermediation or money-transmission service, potentially triggering SBS oversight and requirements applicable to Electronic Money Issuing Companies (EEDEs).
- If custody services evolve into interest-bearing accounts, lending, or other financial products using virtual assets, traditional financial licensing from SBS may be required.
- No specific capital requirements for VASPs — only general company-formation capital for the chosen entity type (e.g., S.A.C., S.A.A.). However, if deemed an EEDE, significant SBS-mandated capital requirements would apply.
- VASPs are not explicitly listed in the current AML/CTF law as 'obligated subjects' but Resolución SBS N° 893-2019 designates them as such for AML/CFT purposes.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity: No dedicated VASP law creates uncertainty around whether SBS will classify certain services (fiat on/off-ramps, custody with yield) as traditional financial activities requiring full banking/EEDE licensing.
- Enforcement risk: VASPs that do not implement robust AML/CFT programs may face UIF-Perú scrutiny and sanctions, even without a formal licensing requirement.
- Regulatory drift: Peru is a FATF/GAFILAT member and is expected to evolve toward a more comprehensive virtual-asset regulatory framework; operators may face transitional compliance burdens.
- Tax/PR exposure: Operating in a grey regulatory area may attract negative attention from regulators or the press, especially if adjacent to traditional finance.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No specific Licensing Regime for VASPs: There is no dedicated law requiring crypto exchanges, custody providers, or crypto-focused payment processors to obtain a specific "virtual asset license" from a regulatory body like the Superintendencia de Banca, Seguros y AFP (SBS) or the Banco Central de Reserva del Perú (BCRP).
AML/CTF Obligations for Existing "Obligated Subjects": The primary regulatory interaction for entities dealing with virtual assets comes from the Unidad de Inteligencia Financiera del Perú (UIF-Perú), which oversees AML/CTF compliance. Existing "obligated subjects" (sujetos obligados) under the AML/CTF framework (like banks, financial institutions, payment service providers dealing with fiat, and money transmitters) are expected to manage risks associated with virtual assets if they engage with them.
No specific crypto exchange license is required.
They typically operate under general commercial law, registering as a regular company in Peru.
However, if an exchange facilitates fiat-to-crypto or crypto-to-fiat conversions, or offers services that could be interpreted as financial intermediation or money transmission under existing laws, there's a risk they might be expected to comply with some aspects of financial regulation, particularly AML/CTF.
No specific crypto custody license is required.
Similar to exchanges, they operate under general company law.
If custody services evolve to offer interest-bearing accounts, lending, or other financial products using virtual assets, they could potentially attract scrutiny from the SBS and might be deemed to require traditional financial licenses.
No specific crypto payment processor license is required.
If they only process crypto-to-crypto payments, they generally fall outside existing financial services regulations.
If they facilitate crypto-to-fiat or fiat-to-crypto payments, or if their services resemble traditional payment services (e.g., money transfers in fiat), they might be subject to the regulations applicable to Electronic Money Issuing Companies (Empresas Emisoras de Dinero Electrónico - EEDEs) or other payment service providers, which are regulated by the SBS. However, the direct application to pure-play crypto firms is often unclear.
No specific capital requirements for VASPs. General company formation capital requirements apply based on the chosen legal entity type (e.g., S.A.C., S.A.A.).
If a VASP were to be deemed a traditional financial institution (e.g., an EEDE), then significant capital requirements mandated by the SBS would apply.
AML/KYC (Anti-Money Laundering/Know Your Customer): This is the most relevant area.
While VASPs are not explicitly listed as "obligated subjects" in the current AML/CTF law, the UIF-Perú encourages all entities engaged in activities susceptible to money laundering (including new technologies) to implement robust AML/KYC practices.
Expected Practices (even if not explicitly licensed):
Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Implementing KYC procedures to identify and verify customers (natural persons and legal entities).
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): For higher-risk customers or transactions.
Monitoring Transactions: Identifying unusual or suspicious patterns.
Reporting Suspicious Transactions (ROS): Reporting any suspicious activity to the UIF-Perú.
Record-Keeping: Maintaining records of transactions and customer data.
Risk Assessment: Conducting a comprehensive risk assessment of money laundering and terrorist financing risks.
Internal Controls: Establishing internal policies, procedures, and training programs.
Resolución SBS N° 893-2019 (and its preceding/subsequent modifications):
What it means for VASPs: VASPs are now required to implement an AML/CFT compliance program, appoint a compliance officer, and report to the UIF-Perú.
FATF Recommendations: As a member of the Financial Action Task Force of Latin America (GAFILAT/FATF-LAC), Peru is committed to implementing the FATF Recommendations. FATF Recommendation 15 specifically calls for countries to regulate and supervise VASPs for AML/CFT purposes, and to apply the FATF standards to them. Peru's regulatory moves reflect this commitment.
Beneficial Ownership: Identify and verify the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the customer, or on whose behalf a transaction is being conducted.
Purpose and Intended Nature of Business Relationship: Understand the customer's activities and the intended purpose and nature of the business relationship or transaction.
Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitor the business relationship and transactions to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring for unusual or suspicious transaction patterns.
Simplified CDD: May be applied in situations of lower risk, provided the VASP has sufficient information to determine that the risk is low.
Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Required for higher-risk customers, business relationships, or transactions. This includes:
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs) and their family members/close associates.
Transactions involving significant amounts of virtual assets.
Transactions with unusual patterns or no apparent economic or lawful purpose.
Collecting additional information on the customer, beneficial owner, source of funds/wealth, and the reasons for the intended transactions.
Obtaining senior management approval for establishing or continuing relationships with such customers.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a locally-incorporated on-shore VASP may operate in Peru without a dedicated crypto license, but must register as a standard company, comply with AML/CFT obligations under Resolución SBS N° 893-2019 (which designates VASPs as obliged entities), and risk being reclassified as a financial institution (e.g., EEDE) if offering fiat conversion or yield-bearing services.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?