← Regulations / Papua New Guinea / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Papua New Guinea

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Papua New Guinea with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • VASPs must implement customer identification and verification (KYC) procedures at onboarding.
  • VASPs must conduct ongoing customer due diligence.
  • VASPs must monitor transactions for suspicious activity.
  • VASPs must file Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) with FASU (Financial Analysis and Supervision Unit).
  • VASPs must implement robust risk-based AML/CTF programs.
  • VASPs must adhere to the FATF Travel Rule for VA transfers (anticipated, not yet legally enforceable).
  • VASPs must screen customers against UN Consolidated Sanctions Lists at onboarding and ongoing basis.
  • VASPs must immediately freeze assets belonging to designated persons/entities and report to FASU.
  • VASPs must comply with prohibitions on dealing with designated persons/entities.
  • Reporting thresholds for traditional financial institutions (PGK 20,000 for cash transactions, PGK 1,000 for electronic funds transfers) provide reference, though not yet legally extended to VASPs.
  • VASPs engaging in international transactions involving USD or US/EU counterparties should screen against OFAC and EU sanctions lists due to extraterritorial reach and correspondent banking risks.

Key Restrictions

  • No specific VASP licensing regime exists yet — a local entity must operate in a regulatory vacuum while awaiting anticipated legislation based on FATF recommendations.
  • Cryptocurrencies are not legal tender in PNG — BPNG has publicly warned consumers about their risks.
  • VASPs are not currently explicitly defined as 'reporting entities' under the AML/CTF Act 2015, creating legal uncertainty.
  • Local incorporation would likely be required for financial licensing once a regime is established.
  • Fit and proper tests for directors and senior management are anticipated under future regulations.
  • Minimum paid-up capital requirements will be set by BPNG based on scope and risk of services.
  • Pre-application consultation with BPNG/FASU is expected before formal licensing once the regime is in place.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity — no VASP-specific licensing or registration framework exists, creating legal uncertainty for operations.
  • Enforcement risk — BPNG has issued public warnings highlighting risks of crypto and lack of consumer protection; operating without a clear regime could attract regulatory action.
  • Travel Rule not yet implemented — VASPs cannot fully comply with FATF Recommendation 16, creating international compliance gaps.
  • Reputational and correspondent banking risk — PNG financial institutions (and VASPs dealing with them) rely on US/EU correspondent relationships, creating de-risking exposure.
  • Tax uncertainty — no specific crypto GST rules exist; treatment of gains depends on whether activity constitutes a business vs. passive investment (absence of CGT creates ambiguity).
  • PNG is rated by FATF-style regional body (APG) as having significant deficiencies in VASP oversight — likely to be pushed toward regulation.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

Currently, neither a specific registration nor a licensing regime exists for VASPs.

licensing 60% confidence

Anticipated Future: Based on FATF recommendations, it is highly probable that PNG will eventually adopt a licensing regime for VASPs. The FATF standards recommend that VASPs be licensed or registered, and subject to effective systems for monitoring and ensuring compliance with AML/CTF requirements. Licensing typically implies a more rigorous pre-approval process and ongoing supervision than simple registration.

licensing 60% confidence

Bank of Papua New Guinea (BPNG): BPNG has previously issued warnings to the public regarding the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including volatility, lack of consumer protection, and potential use for illicit activities. These warnings do not constitute a regulatory framework but indicate a cautious approach.

licensing 60% confidence

Financial Analysis and Supervision Unit (FASU): As the AML/CTF regulator, FASU is responsible for ensuring compliance with the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Act 2015. While VASPs are not explicitly listed as "reporting entities" under this Act yet, the FATF standards imply that they should be.

licensing 60% confidence

AML/KYC (Anti-Money Laundering / Know Your Customer): This is the most certain requirement. Future regulations will mandate VASPs to:

licensing 60% confidence

Identify and verify customers (KYC).

licensing 60% confidence

Conduct ongoing customer due diligence.

licensing 60% confidence

Monitor transactions for suspicious activity.

licensing 60% confidence

Report suspicious transactions to FASU.

licensing 60% confidence

Implement robust risk-based AML/CTF programs.

licensing 60% confidence

Adhere to the "travel rule" for VA transfers, requiring information sharing between VASPs.

licensing 60% confidence

Local Presence: For foreign entities, a local physical presence, a local board of directors, or a local registered company structure is often a requirement for financial licenses.

licensing 60% confidence

Management & Governance: Fit and proper tests for directors and senior management, robust governance structures, internal controls, and risk management frameworks (including cybersecurity).

licensing 60% confidence

Capital Requirements: Financial institutions, including future VASPs, are typically required to maintain a certain level of minimum paid-up capital to demonstrate financial stability and ability to absorb losses. The exact amount would be determined by BPNG based on the scope and risk of services offered.

licensing 60% confidence

Pre-Application Consultation: Discussion with BPNG/FASU.

licensing 60% confidence

Submission of Application: Detailed business plan, legal structure, ownership details, management profiles, capital adequacy proof, AML/CTF policies, risk management framework, technology infrastructure details.

licensing 60% confidence

Due Diligence & Assessment: BPNG/FASU would review the application, conduct interviews, and assess the suitability of the applicant.

licensing 60% confidence

Fit and Proper Checks: For all key personnel.

travel-rule 40% confidence

No, not fully adopted for VASPs/Travel Rule. PNG's Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Act 2015 (AML/CTF Act 2015) and its associated Regulations 2016 do not comprehensively define Virtual Assets (VAs) or Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) in line with FATF Recommendation 15.

travel-rule 40% confidence

Consequently, VASPs are not explicitly designated as "reporting entities" or "financial institutions" under the current AML/CTF framework. This means they are generally not subject to AML/CTF obligations, including the Travel Rule.

travel-rule 40% confidence

The APG MER specifically notes that PNG needs to take steps to license or register VASPs and subject them to the full range of AML/CTF obligations.

aml 60% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing Act 2015 (AML/CTF Act 2015): This Act provides the legal basis for identifying, freezing, and confiscating assets related to money laundering and terrorist financing. It obligates financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) to implement AML/CTF measures. While it pre-dates specific crypto regulation, its broad definitions and principles are applied to virtual asset activities where deemed appropriate by regulators.

aml 60% confidence

Financial Analysis and Supervision Unit (FASU): As the FIU, FASU issues guidance, receives suspicious transaction reports (STRs), and disseminates information regarding designated persons and entities subject to sanctions.

aml 60% confidence

Designated Person/Entity Screening: VASPs must screen their customers (both at onboarding and on an ongoing basis) against the UN Consolidated Sanctions List, which includes individuals and entities designated under various UN sanctions regimes (e.g., terrorism, proliferation, specific country regimes).

aml 60% confidence

Asset Freezing: If a VASP identifies that it holds assets (including virtual assets) belonging to a designated person or entity, it must immediately freeze those assets and report the match to FASU.

aml 60% confidence

Prohibition on Dealing: VASPs are prohibited from making funds or economic resources available to, or for the benefit of, designated persons or entities.

aml 60% confidence

Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): Any transaction involving designated persons, or transactions suspected of being related to money laundering or terrorist financing, must be reported to FASU.

aml 60% confidence

Extraterritorial Reach: OFAC and EU sanctions can have extraterritorial effects, particularly if transactions involve:

aml 60% confidence

Reputational Risk: Failing to comply with major international sanctions regimes like OFAC or EU can lead to severe reputational damage, de-risking by international partners, and exclusion from global financial systems.

tax 40% confidence

PNG does not impose a general Capital Gains Tax.

tax 40% confidence

Income from Business Activities: If an individual or entity is regularly trading cryptocurrency, mining crypto as a business, operating a crypto exchange, or providing services in exchange for crypto, the profits derived would be considered assessable income.

tax 40% confidence

No Specific Crypto GST Rules: There are no specific GST rules for cryptocurrency in PNG.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a locally-incorporated on-shore VASP can operate in Papua New Guinea only in a regulatory vacuum; no specific VASP licensing regime exists yet, but AML/CTF obligations under the AML/CTF Act 2015 (KYC, STRs, sanctions screening) apply via FASU, and a future licensing regime based on FATF recommendations is anticipated, requiring local entity, fit-and-proper management, and minimum capital.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?