Centralized exchange in Pakistan
Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.
CEX is conditionally permitted in Pakistan with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- CDD/KYC under SBP BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022 — identity verification for individuals (CNIC/passport, address, occupation) and legal persons (registration, beneficial ownership)
- Risk-based approach: enhanced due diligence for higher-risk customers, simplified CDD for lower risk (but never full exemption)
- PEP screening — enhanced CDD, senior management approval, source of wealth verification
- Sanctions screening against UN Security Council and national sanctions lists
- Ongoing transaction monitoring — scrutinize transactions for consistency with customer profile and source of funds
- Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) to the Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU) via secure electronic portal for any unusual or suspicious transaction
- No-tipping-off prohibition on disclosing STR filing to customers or third parties
- Record-keeping: CDD records and transaction records for minimum legal retention period under AMLA 2010
- Travel Rule: Not adopted by Pakistan — no legal obligation to transmit originator/beneficiary information for crypto transfers
- Compliance with AMLA 2010 — overarching criminal anti-money laundering law with penalties up to 10 yrs imprisonment and asset forfeiture
Key Restrictions
- De facto banking ban — SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018 prohibits all banks, MFBs, PSOs/PSPs from dealing in, facilitating, or maintaining accounts for virtual currency transactions
- No access to formal financial system — exchange cannot obtain bank accounts or integrate with regulated payment channels in Pakistan
- No specific licensed framework currently exists for centralized exchanges; PVARA licensing under the Virtual Assets Act, 2026 is newly enacted but no operational track record
- No specific client asset segregation rules for digital assets exist under Pakistani law
- No cold-storage mandates or qualified-custodian definitions for digital assets
- No insurance or bonding requirements prescribed for custodians of digital assets
- Travel Rule not adopted — no legal framework for information sharing on crypto transfers exists
Key Risks
- Severe enforcement risk — FIA has actively targeted Binance Pakistan for alleged money laundering and scam facilitation, indicating willingness to prosecute unlicensed VASP activity
- Banking-access risk — the SBP circular remains in effect; policy is not yet settled despite PVARA's new act, creating contradiction between prohibition and nascent licensing regime
- Regulatory ambiguity — the Virtual Assets Act, 2026 conflicts with the SBP circular, and it is unclear whether licensed VASPs will be able to access banking services
- AML/CFT prosecution risk under AMLA 2010 (up to 10 years imprisonment, substantial fines, asset forfeiture) for operating outside the law
- No travel-rule infrastructure means compliance with FATF Recommendation 16 is impossible, creating international compliance gaps
- Public and political sensitivity — crypto is heavily scrutinized in Pakistan media and courts; reputational risk is high
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018: Issued on April 06, 2018, this circular explicitly prohibits all banks, Microfinance Banks (MFBs), and Payment System Operators (PSOs)/Payment Service Providers (PSPs) from:
Dealing in Virtual Currencies/Coins/Tokens (VCs/VCOs/VCTs).
Facilitating any transaction involving VCs/VCOs/VCTs.
Maintaining accounts of individuals/entities involved in VCs/VCOs/VCTs.
Implication: This circular effectively creates a de facto ban on any regulated financial institution in Pakistan from engaging with or facilitating cryptocurrency activities. This means that:
Cryptocurrency exchanges, custody providers, and payment processors cannot legally operate with bank accounts in Pakistan or integrate with the traditional financial system.
Exchanges: No license. Cannot lawfully connect to the banking system.
Pakistan has enacted the Virtual Assets Act, 2026, which requires all Virtual Asset Service Providers, including cryptocurrency custodians, to obtain a license from the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA).
No specific rules for the segregation of client digital assets exist. While traditional financial institutions (like banks or brokerages) have strict client asset segregation rules under the relevant banking and securities laws (e.g., Securities Act, 2015, Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962), these do not apply to unregulated digital assets.
There are no mandates for insurance or bonding requirements for digital asset custodians.
Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (AMLA 2010): This is the overarching legislation that criminalizes money laundering and provides the legal basis for AML/CFT measures in Pakistan. It mandates reporting obligations for financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs).
SBP CDD / KYC Regulations, 2022 (BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022): This is a critical development. The State Bank of Pakistan, through its Banking Policy & Regulations Department (BPRD), issued comprehensive Customer Due Diligence (CDD) / Know Your Customer (KYC) Regulations, 2022. These regulations explicitly define and include "Virtual Asset Service Providers" (VASPs) as a type of entity that must comply with AML/CFT requirements, effectively bringing them under the regulatory ambit.
Key Aspect: These regulations define a VASP, consistent with FATF definitions, and mandate that they adhere to all the CDD/KYC obligations applicable to other financial institutions.
Identification and Verification of Customer Identity:
Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer, including for legal persons, trusts, and other legal arrangements.
Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): Implement enhanced CDD measures for PEPs, including obtaining senior management approval for establishing business relationships, taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and funds, and conducting ongoing enhanced monitoring.
Sanctions Screening: Screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN Security Council sanctions lists).
"Travel Rule" (FATF Recommendation 16): While the SBP CDD/KYC Regulations 2022 implicitly align with FATF standards, explicit guidance on the "Travel Rule" for VASPs (requiring the collection and transmission of originator and beneficiary information for crypto transfers above a certain threshold) may still be developing or need further specific directives. However, as Pakistan adheres to FATF standards, VASPs should anticipate and prepare for full implementation of this rule.
Trigger: Any transaction (attempted or completed) that appears unusual, lacks a clear economic or lawful purpose, is inconsistent with the customer's known profile, or raises suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing.
Reporting Mechanism: Reports are filed electronically through the FMU's secure reporting portal.
"No Tipping Off": VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that a STR has been or will be filed.
No. Pakistan has not adopted the FATF Travel Rule. This is primarily because the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), the central bank and primary financial regulator, along with the Ministry of Finance and other relevant bodies, have taken a position against cryptocurrencies and virtual assets.
Not applicable. Since the Travel Rule has not been adopted, there is no effective date for its implementation.
Which VASPs are Covered:
Entity Targeted: Binance Pakistan (and implicitly, individuals running scam schemes facilitated through Binance). Violation Type: Alleged involvement in multi-million dollar cryptocurrency scam, money laundering, illegal financial transactions, non-compliance with local regulations. The FIA issued a formal notice to Binance's Global Head of Growth for its alleged role in facilitating fraudulent transactions that led to significant financial losses for Pakistani citizens. Penalty Amount: No direct fine was publicly levied against Binance by Pakistani authorities. The "penalty" was primarily investigative pressure, a formal inquiry, and a demand for cooperation, which could have led to further action or reputational damage. The FIA initiated criminal proceedings against individuals involved in the scam. Outcome: The FIA launched an inquiry and issued a formal notice to Binance, demanding details and cooperation. Binance subsequently stated its commitment to cooperate with the FIA and local authorities. The FIA also identified and initiated action against 11 individuals alleged to be masterminds of a multi-million dollar fraud scheme involving Binance. The action highlighted the government's serious concerns about unregulated crypto activities. While Binance itself wasn't fined, the action put significant pressure on the exchange and warned the public.
State Bank of Pakistan BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018: "Caution against usage of Virtual Currencies/Coins/Tokens (VCs/VCOs/VCTs)"
FATF Recommendation 15: Which requires countries to regulate and supervise Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter-Terrorist Financing (CFT) purposes. Pakistan's compliance with FATF recommendations is critical for its international financial standing.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a centralized exchange may operate in Pakistan only under the newly enacted Virtual Assets Act, 2026 with a PVARA license, but faces a de facto banking prohibition under SBP Circular No. 03 of 2018 that blocks access to the formal financial system, creating a legally contradictory and high-risk operating environment.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What exchange / VASP license applies?
- What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
- What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
- What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?