← Regulations / Pakistan / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in Pakistan

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Pakistan without local incorporation, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
No
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • AML obligations under the Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (AMLA 2010) and SBP CDD/KYC Regulations 2022 (BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022) apply to VASPs, including custodial wallet providers.
  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Must verify full legal name, date of birth, national ID (CNIC for Pakistanis, passport for foreigners), address, contact details, occupation/source of funds for individuals.
  • Legal entity CDD: Must verify legal name, registration number, articles of association, memorandum, board resolution, and key management personnel.
  • Beneficial ownership identification: Must identify and verify beneficial owners of customer entities.
  • Risk-based approach: Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for higher-risk customers, transactions, or jurisdictions; simplified CDD allowed for low-risk scenarios but never full exemption.
  • Ongoing transaction monitoring: Scrutinize transactions throughout the relationship to ensure consistency with customer profile and source of funds.
  • PEP screening: Implement enhanced CDD for politically exposed persons, including senior management approval for establishing relationships.
  • Sanctions screening: Screen customers and transactions against UN and other sanctions lists.
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR): File reports with the Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU) for any unusual or suspicious transactions; no tipping-off prohibition applies.
  • Record-keeping: Maintain customer CDD records and transaction records for the legally prescribed retention period.
  • Travel Rule (FATF Rec. 16): Implicitly aligned through SBP CDD/KYC Regulations 2022, though explicit VASP-specific guidance may still be developing.

Key Restrictions

  • SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018 prohibits all banks, MFBs, PSOs/PSPs from dealing in, facilitating, or maintaining accounts related to virtual currencies — effectively banning custodial wallet operators from connecting to the formal banking system.
  • No recognized 'qualified custodian' definition exists for digital assets in Pakistan's regulatory framework.
  • No specific rules exist for segregation of client digital assets, insurance/bonding requirements, or cold storage mandates.
  • The SBP's de facto banking ban for crypto-related entities means any fiat on-ramp/off-ramp for custodial wallets operates outside regulated financial channels or is legally impossible.
  • The Virtual Assets Act, 2026 requires all VASPs, including custodians, to obtain a license from PVARA — but the banking prohibition creates a structural conflict that may functionally prevent licensed operation.

Key Risks

  • SBP Circular No. 03 of 2018 remains in effect and prohibits regulated financial institutions from servicing crypto entities — custodial wallet providers cannot lawfully maintain bank accounts or integrate with Pakistan's financial system.
  • FIA enforcement action against Binance Pakistan demonstrates active law enforcement targeting of crypto operators (money laundering, illegal financial transactions, non-compliance).
  • Regulatory ambiguity persists: PVARA's authority under the Virtual Assets Act, 2026 is nascent, and the SBP prohibition has not been formally withdrawn.
  • No insurance, segregation, or proof-of-reserves rules exist — custodial operators have no regulatory framework to demonstrate safekeeping compliance.
  • Government committees have reportedly favored continued bans (Dawn, Jan 2022), indicating significant political and institutional resistance to crypto operations.
  • FATF compliance pressure may drive rapid regulatory changes, creating whipsaw risk for operators who enter before the banking ban is resolved.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

custody 40% confidence

SBP Circular (January 2018): The State Bank of Pakistan issued Circular No. 03 of 2018, titled "Prohibition of Dealing in Virtual Currencies/Tokens (VCs/ICTs)." This circular explicitly stated that VCs/ICTs are not legal tender in Pakistan and prohibited all banks, financial institutions, and payment system providers from dealing in, processing, or facilitating transactions involving VCs/ICTs.

custody 85% confidence

The State Bank of Pakistan Circular No. 03 of 2018's prohibition remains in effect, but the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority is actively considering its withdrawal, indicating the policy is no longer settled or dominant.

custody 95% confidence

Pakistan has enacted the Virtual Assets Act, 2026, which requires all Virtual Asset Service Providers, including cryptocurrency custodians, to obtain a license from the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA).

custody 40% confidence

No specific rules for the segregation of client digital assets exist. While traditional financial institutions (like banks or brokerages) have strict client asset segregation rules under the relevant banking and securities laws (e.g., Securities Act, 2015, Banking Companies Ordinance, 1962), these do not apply to unregulated digital assets.

custody 40% confidence

There are no mandates for insurance or bonding requirements for digital asset custodians.

custody 40% confidence

No specific mandates or best practices regarding cold storage (offline storage of private keys) for digital assets are prescribed by Pakistani regulators.

custody 40% confidence

The concept of a "qualified custodian" for digital assets is not defined within Pakistan's regulatory framework. The term "qualified custodian" typically refers to institutions meeting specific criteria for safeguarding financial assets, and since cryptocurrencies are not recognized as such for regulatory purposes, no definition applies.

licensing 60% confidence

SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018: Issued on April 06, 2018, this circular explicitly prohibits all banks, Microfinance Banks (MFBs), and Payment System Operators (PSOs)/Payment Service Providers (PSPs) from:

licensing 60% confidence

Cryptocurrency exchanges, custody providers, and payment processors cannot legally operate with bank accounts in Pakistan or integrate with the traditional financial system.

licensing 60% confidence

Custody Providers: No license. Cannot lawfully connect to the banking system.

aml 60% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (AMLA 2010): This is the overarching legislation that criminalizes money laundering and provides the legal basis for AML/CFT measures in Pakistan. It mandates reporting obligations for financial institutions and designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs).

aml 60% confidence

SBP CDD / KYC Regulations, 2022 (BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022): This is a critical development. The State Bank of Pakistan, through its Banking Policy & Regulations Department (BPRD), issued comprehensive Customer Due Diligence (CDD) / Know Your Customer (KYC) Regulations, 2022. These regulations explicitly define and include "Virtual Asset Service Providers" (VASPs) as a type of entity that must comply with AML/CFT requirements, effectively bringing them under the regulatory ambit.

aml 95% confidence

Key Aspect: These regulations define a VASP, consistent with FATF definitions, and mandate that they adhere to all the CDD/KYC obligations applicable to other financial institutions.

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer, including for legal persons, trusts, and other legal arrangements.

aml 90% confidence

VASPs must adopt a risk-based approach to CDD. This means applying enhanced CDD measures for higher-risk customers, products, services, transactions, or geographic areas.

aml 90% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): Implement enhanced CDD measures for PEPs, including obtaining senior management approval for establishing business relationships, taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and funds, and conducting ongoing enhanced monitoring.

aml 60% confidence

Sanctions Screening: Screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN Security Council sanctions lists).

aml 60% confidence

"Travel Rule" (FATF Recommendation 16): While the SBP CDD/KYC Regulations 2022 implicitly align with FATF standards, explicit guidance on the "Travel Rule" for VASPs (requiring the collection and transmission of originator and beneficiary information for crypto transfers above a certain threshold) may still be developing or need further specific directives. However, as Pakistan adheres to FATF standards, VASPs should anticipate and prepare for full implementation of this rule.

aml 60% confidence

Trigger: Any transaction (attempted or completed) that appears unusual, lacks a clear economic or lawful purpose, is inconsistent with the customer's known profile, or raises suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing.

aml 60% confidence

"No Tipping Off": VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that a STR has been or will be filed.

aml 60% confidence

Customer Records: All records obtained through CDD procedures, including identity documents, account files, business correspondence, and analysis of transactions.

enforcement 50% confidence

Entity Targeted: Binance Pakistan (and implicitly, individuals running scam schemes facilitated through Binance). Violation Type: Alleged involvement in multi-million dollar cryptocurrency scam, money laundering, illegal financial transactions, non-compliance with local regulations. The FIA issued a formal notice to Binance's Global Head of Growth for its alleged role in facilitating fraudulent transactions that led to significant financial losses for Pakistani citizens. Penalty Amount: No direct fine was publicly levied against Binance by Pakistani authorities. The "penalty" was primarily investigative pressure, a formal inquiry, and a demand for cooperation, which could have led to further action or reputational damage. The FIA initiated criminal proceedings against individuals involved in the scam. Outcome: The FIA launched an inquiry and issued a formal notice to Binance, demanding details and cooperation. Binance subsequently stated its commitment to cooperate with the FIA and local authorities. The FIA also identified and initiated action against 11 individuals alleged to be masterminds of a multi-million dollar fraud scheme involving Binance. The action highlighted the government's serious concerns about unregulated crypto activities. While Binance itself wasn't fined, the action put significant pressure on the exchange and warned the public.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS providers are subject to the Virtual Assets Act, 2026 and must obtain a PVARA license, but the still-in-effect SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018 prohibits all regulated financial institutions from servicing crypto entities, creating a structural banking ban that functionally prevents licensed custodial operation pending the circular's withdrawal.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?