← Regulations / Pakistan / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Pakistan

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Not permitted AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is not permitted in Pakistan.

Verdict Details

Permitted
no
Local entity required
No
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • VASPs must adhere to CDD/KYC obligations under SBP CDD/KYC Regulations 2022 (BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022) — but only if a lawful licensing path existed (pk.aml.sbp-cdd-kyc-regulations-2022)
  • Customer identification & verification: full name, date of birth, CNIC/passport, address, occupation/source of funds (pk.aml.identification-and-verification-of-customer)
  • Beneficial ownership identification required (pk.aml.beneficial-ownership-identify-and-take)
  • Risk-based approach: enhanced due diligence for higher-risk customers, simplified CDD only for lower risk (never full exemption) (pk.aml.vasps-must-adopt-a-risk-based)
  • PEP screening with senior management approval and ongoing enhanced monitoring (pk.aml.politically-exposed-persons-peps-implement)
  • Sanctions screening against UN and national sanctions lists (pk.aml.sanctions-screening-screen-customers-and)
  • Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) to Financial Monitoring Unit (FMU) for any unusual/suspicious transactions (pk.aml.trigger-any-transaction-attempted-or)
  • Record-keeping: customer CDD records and transaction records must be maintained (pk.aml.customer-records-all-records-obtained, pk.aml.transaction-records-records-of-all)
  • No tipping-off prohibition applies (pk.aml.no-tipping-off-vasps-and)

Key Restrictions

  • SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018 prohibits all banks, MFBs, PSOs/PSPs from dealing in, facilitating, or maintaining accounts for VC/VCO/VCT transactions — creating a de facto inability to access the fiat banking system (pk.licensing.sbp-bprd-circular-no-03)
  • No licensing regime currently exists for on-shore VASPs — proposed frameworks (SECP/SBP) remain draft/legislative proposals only (pk.licensing.exchanges-no-license-cannot-lawfully)
  • The SBP prohibition remains in effect; while the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (PVARA) under the Virtual Assets Act 2026 is mentioned, this appears to be a proposed/emerging framework not yet operationalized (pk.custody.reference-state-bank-of-pakistan, pk.custody.custodial-license-requirements)
  • FATF Travel Rule not adopted; VASPs cannot legally exist to implement it (pk.travel-rule.no-pakistan-has-not-adopted)
  • No segregation-of-client-assets rules, no insurance/bonding mandates, no cold storage mandates, and no qualified custodian definition exist for digital assets (pk.custody.segregation-of-client-assets-rules, pk.custody.there-are-no-mandates-for, pk.custody.cold-storage-mandates, pk.custody.qualified-custodian-definitions)

Key Risks

  • Enforcement risk: FIA has targeted Binance Pakistan for multi-million dollar cryptocurrency scam, money laundering, and illegal financial transactions — demonstrating active enforcement against crypto operations (pk.enforcement.entity-targeted-binance-pakistan-and)
  • Criminal liability risk: individuals/entities could face prosecution under AMLA 2010 (up to 10 years imprisonment), PECA 2016, or SBP regulatory sanctions for operating outside the law (pk.travel-rule.anti-money-laundering-act-2010-amla, pk.travel-rule.prevention-of-electronic-crimes-act)
  • Banking access risk: impossibility of obtaining or maintaining bank accounts due to the SBP circular, making any fiat on/off ramp unlawful (pk.licensing.any-individual-or-entity-involved)
  • Regulatory ambiguity: despite the Virtual Assets Act 2026 being referenced, the SBP ban remains in effect and government committees have produced conflicting recommendations (ban vs. regulate) (pk.custody.update-2022-2023-while-there-have, pk.custody.government-committees-various-committees-have)
  • Tax filing risk: FBR expects crypto gains to be declared as capital gains (15% holding >1 year) or business income (at slab/corporate rates), and assets disclosed in wealth statements, but compliance is nearly impossible without a legal banking channel (pk.tax.if-the-capital-asset-crypto, pk.tax.income-tax-return-itr-any, pk.tax.wealth-statement-form-ab-all)

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

SBP BPRD Circular No. 03 of 2018: Issued on April 06, 2018, this circular explicitly prohibits all banks, Microfinance Banks (MFBs), and Payment System Operators (PSOs)/Payment Service Providers (PSPs) from:

licensing 60% confidence

Dealing in Virtual Currencies/Coins/Tokens (VCs/VCOs/VCTs).

licensing 60% confidence

Facilitating any transaction involving VCs/VCOs/VCTs.

licensing 60% confidence

Maintaining accounts of individuals/entities involved in VCs/VCOs/VCTs.

licensing 60% confidence

Implication: This circular effectively creates a de facto ban on any regulated financial institution in Pakistan from engaging with or facilitating cryptocurrency activities. This means that:

licensing 60% confidence

Exchanges: No license. Cannot lawfully connect to the banking system.

licensing 60% confidence

Custody Providers: No license. Cannot lawfully connect to the banking system.

licensing 60% confidence

Payment Processors (Crypto-related): If processing fiat for crypto, no license and prohibited for regulated entities. If purely crypto-to-crypto, it operates outside the formal financial system but still in a legally ambiguous and high-risk environment.

licensing 60% confidence

Ongoing discussions and proposed legislative efforts, primarily driven by the need to comply with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations, to eventually introduce a regulatory framework.

licensing 60% confidence

Proposed Drafts: Various draft bills and frameworks have been reported in the media, suggesting that a future regime might include:

aml 60% confidence

SBP CDD / KYC Regulations, 2022 (BPRD Circular No. 04 of 2022): This is a critical development. The State Bank of Pakistan, through its Banking Policy & Regulations Department (BPRD), issued comprehensive Customer Due Diligence (CDD) / Know Your Customer (KYC) Regulations, 2022. These regulations explicitly define and include "Virtual Asset Service Providers" (VASPs) as a type of entity that must comply with AML/CFT requirements, effectively bringing them under the regulatory ambit.

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and take reasonable measures to verify the identity of the beneficial owner(s) of the customer, including for legal persons, trusts, and other legal arrangements.

aml 90% confidence

VASPs must adopt a risk-based approach to CDD. This means applying enhanced CDD measures for higher-risk customers, products, services, transactions, or geographic areas.

aml 90% confidence

Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs): Implement enhanced CDD measures for PEPs, including obtaining senior management approval for establishing business relationships, taking reasonable measures to establish the source of wealth and funds, and conducting ongoing enhanced monitoring.

aml 60% confidence

Sanctions Screening: Screen customers and transactions against national and international sanctions lists (e.g., UN Security Council sanctions lists).

aml 60% confidence

Trigger: Any transaction (attempted or completed) that appears unusual, lacks a clear economic or lawful purpose, is inconsistent with the customer's known profile, or raises suspicion of money laundering or terrorist financing.

aml 60% confidence

Customer Records: All records obtained through CDD procedures, including identity documents, account files, business correspondence, and analysis of transactions.

aml 60% confidence

Transaction Records: Records of all transactions, including the amount, currency, date, and details of the parties involved (both originator and beneficiary, where applicable).

aml 60% confidence

"No Tipping Off": VASPs and their employees are prohibited from disclosing to the customer or any third party that a STR has been or will be filed.

custody 40% confidence

SBP Circular (January 2018): The State Bank of Pakistan issued Circular No. 03 of 2018, titled "Prohibition of Dealing in Virtual Currencies/Tokens (VCs/ICTs)." This circular explicitly stated that VCs/ICTs are not legal tender in Pakistan and prohibited all banks, financial institutions, and payment system providers from dealing in, processing, or facilitating transactions involving VCs/ICTs.

custody 85% confidence

The State Bank of Pakistan Circular No. 03 of 2018's prohibition remains in effect, but the Pakistan Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority is actively considering its withdrawal, indicating the policy is no longer settled or dominant.

custody 85% confidence

Custodial License Requirements:

custody 40% confidence

Segregation of Client Assets Rules:

custody 40% confidence

There are no mandates for insurance or bonding requirements for digital asset custodians.

custody 40% confidence

Cold Storage Mandates:

custody 40% confidence

Qualified Custodian Definitions:

custody 40% confidence

Update (2022-2023): While there have been ongoing discussions and government committees formed to evaluate the possibility of regulating cryptocurrencies, no formal change to the SBP's stance or new legislation has been enacted. Reports in local media suggest that committees involving the Ministry of Finance, Law Ministry, and the SBP have explored various options, including maintaining a ban or developing a regulatory framework, often influenced by FATF recommendations.

travel-rule 60% confidence

No. Pakistan has not adopted the FATF Travel Rule. This is primarily because the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), the central bank and primary financial regulator, along with the Ministry of Finance and other relevant bodies, have taken a position against cryptocurrencies and virtual assets.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering Act, 2010 (AMLA): This is the primary legislation for AML/CFT in Pakistan. If virtual asset transactions are used for money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illegal activities, individuals/entities would be prosecuted under this Act. Penalties can include:

travel-rule 60% confidence

Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2016 (PECA): Depending on the nature of the activity, if electronic means are used for illicit VA transactions, other cybercrime laws might also apply.

tax 60% confidence

If the capital asset (crypto) is held for one year or less, the gain is taxed at the individual's normal income tax slab rates.

tax 60% confidence

Income Tax Return (ITR): Any gains or income derived from cryptocurrency activities (whether capital gains, business income, or income from other sources) must be declared in the annual income tax return.

tax 60% confidence

Wealth Statement (Form A/B): All assets, including significant holdings of cryptocurrencies (if considered an asset), should ideally be disclosed in the annual wealth statement, along with their cost and fair market value. This is critical for reconciling income and assets.

enforcement 50% confidence

Entity Targeted: Binance Pakistan (and implicitly, individuals running scam schemes facilitated through Binance). Violation Type: Alleged involvement in multi-million dollar cryptocurrency scam, money laundering, illegal financial transactions, non-compliance with local regulations. The FIA issued a formal notice to Binance's Global Head of Growth for its alleged role in facilitating fraudulent transactions that led to significant financial losses for Pakistani citizens. Penalty Amount: No direct fine was publicly levied against Binance by Pakistani authorities. The "penalty" was primarily investigative pressure, a formal inquiry, and a demand for cooperation, which could have led to further action or reputational damage. The FIA initiated criminal proceedings against individuals involved in the scam. Outcome: The FIA launched an inquiry and issued a formal notice to Binance, demanding details and cooperation. Binance subsequently stated its commitment to cooperate with the FIA and local authorities. The FIA also identified and initiated action against 11 individuals alleged to be masterminds of a multi-million dollar fraud scheme involving Binance. The action highlighted the government's serious concerns about unregulated crypto activities. While Binance itself wasn't fined, the action put significant pressure on the exchange and warned the public.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

No — a locally-incorporated on-shore VASP cannot lawfully operate in Pakistan because the SBP's 2018 circular prohibits any regulated financial institution from facilitating crypto transactions, there is no operative licensing framework (only proposed drafts), and any attempt to operate risks criminal prosecution under AMLA 2010 and active enforcement (e.g., FIA action against Binance Pakistan).

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?