On-shore VASP in Palestine
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is not permitted in Palestine.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- no
- Local entity required
- No
- Licensing burden
- None
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- General AML/CFT Law No. 9 of 2007 applies to traditional financial institutions, but is not specifically tailored or applied to crypto service providers.
- No crypto-specific AML/CFT obligations exist because there is no regulated VASP framework.
- Entities attempting to operate as an on-shore VASP would be outside the legal framework and subject to general financial crime laws, but without defined crypto-specific reporting requirements.
Key Restrictions
- The PMA has prohibited or strongly discouraged financial institutions under its supervision from dealing in cryptocurrencies, effectively banning on-shore VASP operations.
- No licensing framework exists for cryptocurrency exchanges, custody providers, or payment processors — there is no legal pathway to become a licensed on-shore VASP.
- The PMA's position is that cryptocurrencies are high-risk, speculative, lack legal tender status, and are outside the regulated financial system.
- Any attempt to operate would face legal exposure under existing banking and financial laws for operating unlicensed financial services.
- Entities in the Palestinian territories also face heightened scrutiny related to terror financing sanctions by OFAC and Israeli authorities, creating additional geopolitical risk.
Key Risks
- Legal illegality risk: The PMA's stance constitutes a de facto prohibition, and anyone operating could face fines, asset freezes, or criminal charges for operating an unlicensed financial business.
- Sanctions risk: OFAC and Israeli NBCTF enforcement actions against Hamas-linked crypto activity create severe counterparty and geographic risk for any operator in Palestinian territories.
- No legal framework: There are no capital requirements, no application process, and no licensing pathway — full legal uncertainty.
- Reputational and financial risk: Any regulated financial institution found facilitating crypto activity would face PMA sanctions and reputational damage.
- MENAFATF mutual evaluation reports highlight the prohibitive stance as a risk-mitigation strategy but note gaps in oversight of virtual assets.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
No specific licensing framework: There are no dedicated laws, regulations, or licensing procedures specifically for cryptocurrency exchanges, custody providers, or payment processors in Palestine.
Discouragement/Prohibition: The PMA views cryptocurrencies as high-risk, speculative, lacking legal tender status, and outside the regulated financial system. Financial institutions under PMA supervision are generally discouraged or implicitly prohibited from dealing with them.
Exchanges: Not licensed. Any attempt to operate a cryptocurrency exchange legally would likely face significant hurdles due to the lack of a regulatory framework and the PMA's stance.
Custody Providers: Not licensed.
Payment Processors (dealing with crypto): Not licensed. Traditional payment processors are regulated by the PMA, but this framework does not extend to processing payments directly in cryptocurrencies.
Neither exists for crypto specifically. Palestine does not have a "registration regime" or a "licensing regime" for virtual assets or VASPs. The de facto regime is one of caution and unofficial prohibition for regulated entities.
Capital: No specified capital requirements for crypto firms.
AML/KYC: Palestine has general Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) laws and regulations that apply to traditional financial institutions. However, because there's no framework for crypto, these laws are not specifically tailored or applied to crypto service providers in a licensing context. Any entity operating would still be subject to general business registration and potential scrutiny under existing AML/CFT laws if they are found to be facilitating illicit activities.
Local Presence: No specific requirements for local presence for crypto businesses, as they are not formally recognized or licensed.
There is no application process for cryptocurrency licenses in Palestine because such licenses do not exist.
N/A. As there is no specific regulatory framework for licensed VASPs, there is no effective date for the Travel Rule's implementation.
PMA Position: The PMA has explicitly stated that it does not license or supervise any entities dealing with cryptocurrencies and has warned financial institutions against engaging in any transactions related to them. They emphasize the risks associated with price volatility, lack of regulatory oversight, potential for illicit activities, and the absence of an issuing authority.
Regulator Name: Palestinian Monetary Authority (PMA)
Entity Targeted: All financial institutions under PMA supervision, and by extension, the general public within its jurisdiction. Violation Type: Dealing in cryptocurrencies. The PMA considers cryptocurrencies to be highly volatile, prone to speculative risks, lacking legal tender status, and a tool for money laundering and terrorism financing. Penalty Amount: No specific penalty amount against an individual entity has been publicly announced by the PMA for crypto dealing. The implication is that financial institutions dealing in crypto would face regulatory sanctions (e.g., license revocation, operational restrictions) from the PMA. Individuals could face legal consequences under local laws.
Date: The PMA first issued a warning against dealing in cryptocurrencies in 2018 and has reiterated its prohibition multiple times, including within the last three years. For instance, statements reiterating caution or prohibition have been reported in 2021.
Outcome: Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Palestine, and licensed financial institutions are explicitly prohibited from dealing in them. This discourages official adoption and pushes any activity underground.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- high
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
No — On-shore VASP operations are not permitted in Palestine because the PMA has effectively prohibited cryptocurrencies within the regulated financial system, there is no licensing framework for VASPs, and no legal pathway exists to establish a compliant locally-incorporated crypto service provider.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?