← Regulations / Paraguay / Operating Models / Custodial SaaS

Custodial wallet / SaaS in Paraguay

Hosted wallet provider that holds keys on behalf of end users, often white-labeled to businesses (custody as a service).

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Custodial SaaS is conditionally permitted in Paraguay with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with SEPRELAD as a VASP (Resolution No. 222/2022 and Resolution No. 24/2023)
  • Appointment of a qualified Compliance Officer responsible for AML/CFT compliance
  • Implementation of comprehensive AML/CFT policies including risk assessment, customer due diligence (CDD), enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers, and ongoing monitoring
  • Customer Identification and Verification (KYC) for natural and legal persons
  • Transaction monitoring for suspicious patterns and activities
  • Reporting suspicious transactions (SARs) to SEPRELAD
  • Record-keeping of customer identification data and transactions for a minimum of 5 years
  • Employee training on AML/CFT obligations
  • Maintenance of robust technological infrastructure and cybersecurity protocols to protect customer data and assets
  • The VASP must be established as a legal entity duly registered in Paraguay with a physical registered office
  • No explicit minimum capital requirement defined by SEPRELAD, but financial solvency and operational capacity must be demonstrated

Key Restrictions

  • Must obtain a general operating license from the Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MIC) under Law No. 6995/2022
  • Must register with SEPRELAD as a VASP under AML Resolution No. 222/2022 (as modified by Resolution No. 24/2023)
  • Must be established as a legal entity with a physical registered office in Paraguay
  • There is no specific 'crypto custody license' — only a general operating license under the MIC which may cover custody activities
  • No explicit regulatory mandates exist for asset segregation, insurance/bonding, cold storage, or proof-of-reserves for crypto custodians
  • Banco Central del Paraguay (BCP) does not recognize crypto as legal tender or financial instruments and does not license crypto custodians as financial institutions

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity: the scope of Law No. 6995/2022 is general and may not clearly address pure third-party custody services (vs. mining or trading platforms)
  • No specific qualified-custodian framework exists, creating uncertainty about best practices for asset segregation and client asset protection
  • SEPRELAD's AML framework exists but a comprehensive licensing regime for VASPs is still developing — future enforcement actions are possible
  • BCP has historically maintained a cautious stance and does not treat crypto activities as regulated financial services, limiting access to the formal banking system
  • Enforcement focus to date has been on illegal mining (electricity theft); VASP enforcement is nascent but building

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

custody 60% confidence

Law No. 6995/2022: Ley que crea el marco regulatorio para la explotación comercial de la minería, comercialización y la industrialización de activos digitales criptoactivos (Law creating the regulatory framework for the commercial exploitation of mining, commercialization, and industrialization of crypto digital assets).

custody 60% confidence

General Operating License: Law 6995/2022 mandates that any company engaged in the "commercial exploitation, mining, commercialization and industrialization of crypto assets" must obtain an operating license from the Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MIC).

custody 60% confidence

Ministry of Industry and Commerce (MIC): This is the primary regulatory body designated by Law 6995/2022 for issuing operating licenses and overseeing the activities related to the commercial exploitation, mining, commercialization, and industrialization of crypto assets.

custody 60% confidence

While the law defines "commercialization" broadly, it is not explicitly detailed whether a pure third-party custody service (i.e., not involved in mining or general trading platform operation) falls squarely under this definition, or if a separate, specific "custody license" is required.

custody 60% confidence

There is no specific "crypto custody license" distinct from the general operating license for crypto businesses established by Law 6995/2022, nor is there a dedicated financial regulator (like the BCP) overseeing crypto custody in the same way they do for traditional financial institutions.

custody 60% confidence

General commercial and consumer protection laws would apply, but there are no specific crypto-focused requirements for asset segregation.

custody 60% confidence

No Explicit Requirements: The current legislation does not explicitly mandate insurance coverage or bonding requirements specifically for crypto asset custodians.

custody 60% confidence

No Explicit Mandates: There are no explicit regulatory mandates in Paraguay for the use of cold storage (offline storage) for digital assets under custody. The law does not prescribe specific technical security measures for asset storage.

custody 60% confidence

No Specific Definition: Paraguay's existing legislation does not provide a specific definition for a "qualified custodian" in the context of digital assets, similar to those found in U.S. or European financial regulations.

aml 60% confidence

SEPRELAD (Secretaría de Prevención de Lavado de Dinero o Bienes): This is the key regulatory body for AML/CFT compliance for virtual assets. SEPRELAD defines Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) and sets forth their obligations.

aml 60% confidence

Resolution No. 222/2022: This resolution from SEPRELAD specifically established guidelines for the prevention of money laundering and terrorism financing for Virtual Asset Service Providers. It defines what constitutes a VASP and outlines their obligations.

aml 60% confidence

Resolution No. 24/2023: This resolution modified certain aspects of Resolution No. 222/2022, particularly detailing reporting requirements for VASPs.

aml 60% confidence

Custody Providers (Virtual Asset Custody Providers): Entities that provide safekeeping services for virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets are considered VASPs.

aml 60% confidence

AML/KYC (Anti-Money Laundering / Know Your Customer): This is the core requirement.

aml 60% confidence

Robust Policies and Procedures: Implementation of comprehensive AML/CFT policies and procedures, including risk assessment, customer due diligence (CDD), enhanced due diligence (EDD) for high-risk customers, and ongoing monitoring.

aml 60% confidence

Customer Identification and Verification: Collecting and verifying identity information for natural and legal persons (KYC).

aml 60% confidence

Transaction Monitoring: Monitoring transactions for suspicious patterns and activities.

aml 60% confidence

Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs): Reporting suspicious transactions to SEPRELAD.

aml 60% confidence

Compliance Officer: Appointment of a qualified and designated Compliance Officer responsible for AML/CFT compliance.

aml 60% confidence

Employee Training: Regular training for employees on AML/CFT obligations.

aml 60% confidence

Record Keeping: Maintaining records of customer identification data and transactions for the prescribed period (usually 5 years).

aml 60% confidence

Legal Entity: The VASP must be established as a legal entity (e.g., corporation or limited liability company) duly registered in Paraguay.

aml 60% confidence

Registered Office: Maintenance of a physical registered office in Paraguay.

aml 60% confidence

SEPRELAD's resolutions for VASPs do not explicitly define a minimum capital requirement for the purpose of AML/CFT registration. However, as a business operating in Paraguay, the entity must demonstrate financial solvency and operational capacity, which implies having sufficient capital to operate responsibly and meet its obligations. Financial institutions, if a VASP were to be considered one, would have capital requirements imposed by the Central Bank (BCP), but currently, VASPs are primarily regulated for AML/CFT purposes, not as licensed financial institutions.

aml 60% confidence

Technology and Security:

aml 60% confidence

Internal Controls and Governance:

custody 60% confidence

BCP Stance Example: Comunicado del BCP sobre criptomonedas (2021) (While older, it reflects their general position of non-recognition as legal tender/financial instrument under their direct oversight).

enforcement 60% confidence

Entity Targeted: Numerous individuals and groups operating large-scale, unauthorized cryptocurrency mining farms. Outcome: Hundreds of illegal mining farms disconnected, numerous arrests, significant economic losses to operators through equipment confiscation and fines, and continued efforts by authorities to curb the practice.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — custodial wallet/SaaS providers are permitted as VASPs under Law No. 6995/2022 (MIC general operating license) and must register with SEPRELAD for AML/CFT compliance, but no specific custody, segregation, insurance, or qualified-custodian framework exists, creating operational ambiguity.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What custody license / qualified-custodian status applies?
  • What segregation, insurance, and proof-of-reserves rules apply?
  • What AML obligations attach to the SaaS vs the white-label client?