Self-custodial wallet / non-custodial software in Serbia
Publisher of software where users hold their own private keys. The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds.
Self-custodial wallet is conditionally permitted in Serbia without local incorporation, subject to AML obligations and none licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- No
- Licensing burden
- None
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
Key Restrictions
- The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds — this falls outside the definition of 'custody and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets' as defined in the Law on Digital Assets.
- None of the licensable VASP activities (exchange, transfer, safekeeping, issuance, advisory) are triggered by mere software publishing where the publisher does not control private keys.
- No licensing obligation attaches because the operator does not perform any 'virtual asset service' as defined under Serbian law.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity remains — if the wallet software generates revenue through integrated swap/trading features (e.g., embedded exchange), that could be viewed as unlicensed VASP activity.
- Tax reporting obligations for users are the user's concern, but the publisher could face reputational or PR risk if users use the software for unlicensed activity.
- Serbia has active enforcement against unlicensed crypto operators (Ponzi schemes, fraud), but there is no precedent targeting pure non-custodial software publishers.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Law on Digital Assets (Zakon o digitalnoj imovini):
This law defines digital assets, regulates their issuance and trading, and explicitly designates Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) as obliged entities under the general AML/CFT law. It also sets out the licensing requirements for VASPs.
Receipt, transfer, and execution of orders related to digital assets.
Exchange of digital assets for fiat currency.
Exchange of digital assets for fiat currency.
Transfer of digital assets.
Safekeeping and administration of digital assets on behalf of clients (custody).
Issuance of digital assets.
Advisory services related to digital assets.
Custody and/or administration of virtual assets or instruments enabling control over virtual assets.
Exchange between virtual assets and fiat currencies.
Exchange between one or more forms of virtual assets.
Entity Targeted: Various domestic entities and individuals operating crypto asset exchange or custody services without the required licenses. While specific names are not always publicly disclosed with detailed penalties, the NBS has consistently emphasized its licensing requirements and taken steps against non-compliant entities. Violation Type: Operating a virtual asset service provider (VASP) without obtaining the necessary operating license from the NBS, as mandated by the Digital Assets Law. This includes facilitating the exchange of virtual assets for fiat currency or other virtual assets, or providing custody services. Penalty Amount: Administrative fines, cessation of operations. The Digital Assets Law (Article 109, Paragraph 1, Point 1 and 2) prescribes fines ranging from RSD 100,000 to RSD 5,000,000 for legal entities and RSD 10,000 to RSD 500,000 for responsible persons within the legal entity, along with potential protective measures like a ban on conducting business. Outcome: Several entities have either ceased operations, come into compliance, or faced administrative proceedings. The NBS continues to monitor the market for unlicensed activity.
Entity Targeted: Individuals and organized criminal groups involved in large-scale crypto Ponzi schemes, investment fraud, and money laundering using virtual assets. Examples include actions related to the "Infinity Economics" scheme and connections to other global crypto scams like "Finiko.". Violation Type: Fraud, money laundering, unauthorized organization of games of chance (depending on the nature of the scheme), cybercrime. These often fall under general criminal statutes rather than specific "crypto violations.". Penalty Amount: Arrests, pre-trial detention, asset freezes (including virtual assets), criminal charges leading to potential prison sentences if convicted. Specific final conviction penalties (amounts/sentences) are rarely publicly detailed for each individual case by Serbian authorities, especially if investigations are ongoing or multi-jurisdictional. Outcome: Numerous arrests have been made, leading to ongoing investigations, indictments, and trials. Assets, including cryptocurrencies, have been seized. These cases are often complex and lengthy.
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a non-custodial wallet software publisher that never holds, controls, or accesses user private keys or funds does not fall within the scope of Serbian VASP licensing or AML obligations, because its activity does not match any of the licensable virtual-asset services (custody, exchange, transfer, issuance, advisory) defined under the Law on Digital Assets.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- Does software publishing trigger VASP / MSB classification?
- Do AML obligations attach when no custody exists?
- What disclosure or consumer-protection rules apply?