Centralized exchange in Saudi Arabia
Order-book exchange that takes custody of user assets and matches trades between users.
CEX is conditionally permitted in Saudi Arabia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- High
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Subject to Royal Decree M/20 (AML/CFT) general transaction reporting obligations
- Entity must have AML systems in place for sandbox admission review
- Ongoing AML/CFT compliance verification required post-sandbox
- Travel-rule obligations: No specific Saudi legislation or regulatory guidance enacted; no effective implementation date, threshold amounts, or VASP coverage scope defined for Travel Rule
Key Restrictions
- Public crypto trading, custody, and exchange services are illegal/unlicensed per the 2018 Standing Committee Declaration (SAMA/CMA/MOF) — virtual currencies declared illegal
- SAMA and MOF have issued ongoing warnings that crypto activities fall outside the legal framework
- No standardized VASP or crypto-specific license exists for retail exchanges; activities fall outside approved perimeters
- Only route for potential approval is SAMA's Regulatory Sandbox — requires full application, up to 1 year review/testing, and post-sandbox operational approval
- Must first register a local company (e.g., LLC), disclose UBOs, and define business objects before applying to sandbox
- Foreign firms may operate only if activities align with SAMA approvals; must form local entity upon issuance
- No custody segregation rules, insurance requirements, or cold-storage mandates apply due to lack of recognized custody framework
- Institutional players advised to use offshore custodians in UAE or Bahrain
Key Risks
- Fundamental regulatory ambiguity: public crypto exchanges have been declared illegal since 2018 — any sandbox approval is at SAMA's sole discretion and precedent is unclear
- No recognized licensing framework means operators face legal action risk if they operate outside the sandbox or if sandbox approval is not granted
- No travel-rule framework exists, creating compliance ambiguity for cross-border withdrawals
- No asset segregation or custody rules means user assets lack legal protection structures
- Ongoing SAMA and MOF public warnings create enforcement and reputational risk for any crypto activities
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Custodial License Requirements: None exist, as no licenses are issued for cryptocurrency practices; entities claiming otherwise face legal action.
Segregation of Client Assets Rules: No rules apply, given the absence of recognized crypto custody services.
Insurance/Bonding Requirements: Not mandated, as crypto activities are unlicensed and prohibited.
Cold Storage Mandates: No mandates, due to the overall ban on public cryptocurrencies.
Qualified Custodian Definitions: No definitions provided in regulations, as crypto custody is not authorized.
No standardized licenses: There is no broadly public VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) or crypto-specific license for retail exchanges, custody, or payment processing; activities like crypto trading, wallet services, or brokerage fall outside approved perimeters without explicit regulatory approval.
Limited permitted activities: Under SAMA's 2023 Payment Service Provider Regulations (enabled by the 2022 Law of Payments and Payment Providers), related services such as digital banking, electronic payment processing, P2P lending/investment, asset/wealth investment, crypto/blockchain applications, and BNPL may qualify indirectly, but not pure crypto trading or custody.
Exchanges and custody: Require entry via SAMA's Regulatory Sandbox as the primary (and currently only recognized) route for testing and potential approval; full operations demand ongoing compliance verification.
Payment processors: Must align with payment regulations; foreign entities can apply pre-incorporation but must form a local entity upon issuance.
Primarily a licensing regime with sandbox entry: Business registration alone (e.g., via Ministry of Investment - MISA portal) is insufficient; it precedes a preliminary sandbox application to SAMA for crypto-related activities. No "one-click" registration substitutes for licensing, and unlicensed operations face administrative penalties, unannounced inspections, and potential legal action.
Entity setup first: Legally register a company (e.g., LLC), disclose UBOs/shareholding, define business objects, then seek sandbox admission; foreign firms may operate if activities align with SAMA approvals.
Register entity and obtain investment license via MISA portal (upload documents, select authorized activity).
Submit preliminary application to SAMA Regulatory Sandbox electronically (full documentation on solvency, audits, AML systems, business model).
Undergo review/testing (up to 1 year); meet ongoing reporting, security, and client protection standards.
Post-sandbox: Secure full operational approval; continuous audits required.
SAMA Payment Service Provider Regulations (2023): https://www.sama.gov.sa (search regulations).
SAMA Regulatory Sandbox: https://www.sama.gov.sa/en-US/FinTech/Pages/RegulatorySandbox.aspx
2018 Standing Committee Declaration (via SAMA/CMA): Virtual assets illegal/unlicensed.
MISA Portal: https://misa.gov.sa
Asset segregation rules: No rules apply, as crypto custody lacks regulation; institutional players are advised to use offshore custodians in jurisdictions like UAE or Bahrain.
Insurance requirements: None specified, given the lack of a custody framework. [1-7]
2018 Standing Committee declaration (SAMA/CMA/MOF): Virtual currencies illegal. (https://www.lightspark.com/knowledge/is-crypto-legal-in-saudi-arabia)
SAMA warnings against Bitcoin (ongoing): No oversight or support. (https://zipmex.com/blog/is-crypto-mining-legal-in-saudi-arabia/) ; (https://freemanlaw.com/cryptocurrency/saudi-arabia/)
MOF 2019 warning: Outside legal framework. (https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/middle-east/saudis-bitcoin-trading-laws-2025-what-traders-and-businesses-need-to-know/articleshow/124017628.cms)
Royal Decree M/20 (AML/CFT): General transaction reporting. (https://zipmex.com/blog/is-crypto-mining-legal-in-saudi-arabia/)
Whether Saudi Arabia has enacted specific legislation or regulatory guidance for the Travel Rule
An effective implementation date for Saudi Arabia
Applicable threshold amounts for transactions
Which types of VASPs are covered under Saudi Arabia's framework
URLs to relevant Saudi Arabian legislation or regulatory guidance
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — a centralized exchange can only potentially operate via SAMA's Regulatory Sandbox pathway, but faces fundamental legal headwinds since the 2018 Standing Committee declared virtual currencies illegal and no standardized VASP licensing framework exists.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What exchange / VASP license applies?
- What custody segregation rules apply to user assets?
- What market-conduct and listing rules apply?
- What travel-rule obligations apply on withdrawals?