← Regulations / Solomon Islands / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Solomon Islands

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Solomon Islands with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD) under the AML/CFT Act 2021 — identify and verify natural persons (full name, DOB, residential address, nationality, unique ID number) and legal persons (name, legal form, proof of existence, senior management identities)
  • Beneficial ownership identification at 25%+ threshold for legal entity customers
  • Purpose and intended nature of the business relationship must be documented
  • Ongoing monitoring of transactions for consistency with customer risk profile
  • Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) required for PEPs, cross-border correspondent relationships, high-risk jurisdictions, complex/unusually large transactions, and anonymity-enhancing virtual assets
  • Suspicious Transaction Reports (STRs) must be submitted to the Solomon Islands Financial Intelligence Unit (SIFIU) promptly (within 24–48 hours of forming suspicion as per SIFIU guidance)
  • No tipping-off prohibition on disclosing STR submissions
  • Record-keeping: copies of CDD documents, all transaction records (including Travel Rule info where applicable), and business correspondence must be retained
  • No specific crypto Travel Rule adopted — FATF Recommendation 16 not yet implemented; no threshold amounts for information exchange exist

Key Restrictions

  • No dedicated VASP licensing framework exists — the operator must be structured under traditional financial/securities law (Financial Institutions Act 1998 or Companies Act 2009) which was not designed for virtual assets
  • Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender by CBSI and the CBSI has publicly warned against their use
  • If tokens held or dealt in are deemed securities under the Howey-style test, prospectus requirements under the Companies Act 2009 may apply
  • No specific crypto custody license exists; custody activities rely on general fiduciary principles and potential application of the Financial Institutions Act 1998
  • No regulatory framework for regulated crypto exchanges in the Solomon Islands; trading typically occurs on offshore platforms
  • No specific capital adequacy, insurance, cold storage, or qualified custodian rules exist for digital assets

Key Risks

  • Extreme regulatory ambiguity — no dedicated VASP, crypto custody, or securities token framework creates significant legal uncertainty for on-shore operations
  • CBSI has issued public warnings discouraging cryptocurrency use, creating potential PR and regulatory friction
  • Enforcement risk under general laws (Companies Act 2009 for unregistered securities; AML/CFT Act 2002/2021 for financial crime) — lack of specific crypto legislation does not mean immunity
  • Tax treatment of crypto income is uncertain and left to general Income Tax Act interpretation — no CGT but profits from regular trading may be taxed as business income at up to 30% corporate rate or ~40% top individual rate
  • APG mutual evaluation (2019) found Solomon Islands had not assessed ML/TF risks of VAs/VASPs — future FATF-driven legislative changes could impose new obligations retroactively or with short lead times
  • No Travel Rule adoption means compliance with FATF standards is incomplete, potentially affecting correspondent relationships and international reputation

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

There are no regulated cryptocurrency exchanges operating under Solomon Islands' jurisdiction. Trading would typically occur on offshore platforms, which are outside the direct regulatory purview of the Solomon Islands authorities.

licensing 60% confidence

The CBSI has warned the public against the risks of trading cryptocurrencies due to their volatility, speculative nature, and lack of regulation.

licensing 60% confidence

Lack of Specific Legislation: Without a dedicated framework, enforcement actions are harder to initiate.

licensing 60% confidence

Companies Act 2009: For breaches related to illegal offerings of unregistered securities or failures in disclosure.

licensing 60% confidence

Prospectus Requirements: Issuers may need to prepare and register a prospectus or offer document with the Registrar of Companies, providing full disclosure of material information about the token, the project, the risks, and the issuer.

licensing 60% confidence

Licensing: While not explicitly for "token issuers," entities offering or dealing in securities might need to be licensed or authorized if such a framework exists for traditional securities brokers or investment advisors under a future Securities Act or related regulations.

aml 60% confidence

Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing Act 2021 (the AML/CFT Act): This comprehensive legislation aligns the Solomon Islands with international FATF standards, covering customer due diligence, reporting obligations, and broader AML/CFT requirements for financial institutions, which increasingly include VASPs.

aml 60% confidence

Solomon Islands Financial Intelligence Unit (SIFIU)

aml 60% confidence

Identification and Verification of Identity:

aml 60% confidence

Natural Persons: Obtain full name, date of birth, residential address, nationality, and unique identification number (e.g., passport, national ID). Verify this information using reliable, independent source documents, data, or information.

aml 60% confidence

Legal Persons/Entities (e.g., Companies): Obtain name, legal form, proof of existence, powers that regulate and bind the legal person, and the names of relevant persons holding senior management positions.

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership: Identify and verify the identity of the natural person(s) who ultimately own or control the customer (typically 25% or more ownership/control threshold for legal entities).

aml 60% confidence

Purpose and Intended Nature of the Business Relationship: Understand the reason for the customer establishing the relationship and the expected nature of their virtual asset activities.

aml 60% confidence

Ongoing Monitoring: Continuously monitor the business relationship and transactions to ensure they are consistent with the VASP's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile. This includes monitoring for unusual or suspicious activities.

aml 60% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Apply EDD measures in higher-risk situations, including:

aml 60% confidence

Reporting Obligation: Reports must be submitted to the SIFIU promptly. SIFIU guidance usually specifies a timeframe (e.g., within 24-48 hours of forming suspicion).

aml 60% confidence

No Tipping-Off: VASPs and their employees are strictly prohibited from informing the customer or any third party that an STR has been or will be submitted.

custody 60% confidence

No specific crypto custody license: There is no dedicated license for virtual asset custodians.

custody 60% confidence

Potential application of existing licenses: If an entity's activities involving digital assets were deemed to fall under the definition of banking business, financial institution services, or securities trading, it would likely require a license under the Financial Institutions Act 1998 or other relevant financial legislation administered by the CBSI. However, this would depend on how digital assets are legally characterized, which is currently ambiguous for custody.

custody 60% confidence

No specific crypto rules: There are no explicit rules mandating the segregation of client digital assets from the custodian's proprietary assets.

custody 60% confidence

General fiduciary principles: For traditional financial institutions, general principles of fiduciary duty and client asset protection would typically apply, implying segregation. However, without specific legislation for digital assets, the enforceability and interpretation for crypto assets would be unclear.

custody 60% confidence

No specific mandates: There are no legal mandates in the Solomon Islands for using cold storage or any particular security measures for digital assets under custody. This is an operational detail typically specified in advanced crypto regulatory frameworks.

travel-rule 60% confidence

Not Adopted: The Solomon Islands does not have a specific regulatory framework for Virtual Assets (VAs) or Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs). Consequently, the FATF Travel Rule (Recommendation 16, as applied to VASPs under Recommendation 15) has not been adopted or made effective.

tax 60% confidence

Solomon Islands does NOT have a general Capital Gains Tax.

tax 60% confidence

However, this does not mean profits are entirely tax-free. If the activities involving cryptocurrency are deemed to constitute a "business" or if the profits are considered "income" under the Income Tax Act, they could be taxable under income tax provisions (see below).

tax 60% confidence

Profits from Trading: If a company trades cryptocurrency, any profits generated would generally be considered part of the company's ordinary business income and taxed at the corporate income tax rate.

tax 60% confidence

Companies: The general corporate income tax rate is typically around 30%.

tax 60% confidence

There is currently NO crypto-specific tax legislation in the Solomon Islands.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
low

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP is theoretically possible but faces a near-absence of tailored legislation; it must navigate general financial services licensing (Financial Institutions Act 1998, Companies Act 2009 securities provisions) and AML/CFT Act 2021 obligations, with no dedicated VASP license, no crypto custody rules, no Travel Rule adoption, and active CBSI warnings against crypto, creating high legal uncertainty.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?