Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in Sudan

De Facto Prohibition/Strong Discouragement: While there might not be an explicit blanket ban in the form of a specific law against holding cryptocurrencies, their use for transactions or the operation of crypto-related businesses is highly discouraged and effectively operates in a legal grey area, if not against CBoS directives.

No Legal Tender Status: Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Sudan.

Exchanges (VASP-like activities): There are no specific licenses for cryptocurrency exchanges in Sudan. Any entity attempting to operate such a business would do so without specific regulatory approval, exposing them to significant legal and operational risks, including potential enforcement actions from the CBoS or other financial authorities under existing banking or financial services laws.

Neither: As there is no specific framework, there is no established registration or licensing regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) in Sudan.

AML/KYC Requirements: This is perhaps the most critical aspect. While not crypto-specific, Sudan is a member of the Middle East & North Africa Financial Action Task Force (MENAFATF) and is committed to combating money laundering and terrorist financing (AML/CFT).

General AML/CFT Laws: Sudan has general AML/CFT legislation, such as the National Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Act (2014). Any financial institution or designated non-financial business and profession (DNFBP) operating in Sudan is obligated to adhere to these laws, including implementing customer due diligence (KYC) and reporting suspicious transactions.

Local Presence: Any legally registered business in Sudan typically requires a local presence (registered office, local management/directors) as per general company law requirements.

Non-existent: There is no established application process for cryptocurrency or virtual asset licenses or registrations in Sudan because the framework does not exist.

Bank of Sudan's Stance (Reported): The CBoS has issued numerous warnings against the use of cryptocurrencies. These warnings are often reported by local and international news outlets.

National Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Act (2014): This is the primary legislation for AML/CFT in Sudan. While it predates the widespread recognition of virtual assets, its principles would apply to any financial activity.

Custodial License Requirements: No licenses are issued for cryptocurrency custody as the activity itself is not formally recognized or permitted.

Cryptocurrencies are not recognized as legal tender in Sudan.

Dealing in them carries significant risks due to volatility, lack of regulation, and potential for fraud or money laundering.

2018 & Beyond: The Central Bank of Sudan has repeatedly warned against cryptocurrency trading. For example, in 2018, it reportedly issued a circular prohibiting financial institutions from dealing with cryptocurrencies. This stance has been reiterated in subsequent years.

De Facto Ban: The Central Bank of Sudan (CBOS) has repeatedly warned against the use of cryptocurrencies, citing risks such as money laundering, terrorism financing, price volatility, and consumer protection issues. These warnings have effectively created a ban on their use within the formal financial system.

No Licensed VASPs: Due to this stance, there are no licensed or regulated Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) operating legally in Sudan. Any entity facilitating crypto transactions would be doing so outside the formal regulatory framework and potentially illegally.

The Anti-Money Laundering and Combating Terrorism Financing Law of 2014 (Law No. 4 of 2014): This is the primary legislation governing AML/CFT in Sudan. It establishes the legal framework for identifying, investigating, and prosecuting money laundering and terrorism financing offenses.

Identification and Verification:

Beneficial Ownership Identification: Taking reasonable measures to understand the ownership and control structure of legal entities and identify the natural persons who ultimately own or control the customer.

Ongoing Monitoring: Conducting ongoing due diligence on the business relationship and scrutinizing transactions undertaken throughout the course of the relationship to ensure they are consistent with the institution's knowledge of the customer, their business, and risk profile, including where necessary, the source of funds.

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Applied in higher-risk situations, such as relationships with Politically Exposed Persons (PEPs), customers from high-risk jurisdictions, or complex transactions. This would likely be a default for crypto if ever legalized, given its inherent risks.

Obligation to Report: Financial institutions (and potentially other designated non-financial businesses and professions - DNFBPs, if applicable) are obligated to report suspicious transactions to the Financial Information Unit (FIU) of Sudan.

Financial institutions are typically required to retain all records of customer identification data, account files, business correspondence, and transaction records for a specified period (e.g., at least five years) following the termination of the business relationship or the execution of the transaction. This includes: