On-shore VASP in Slovenia
Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.
On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Slovenia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.
Verdict Details
- Permitted
- conditional
- Local entity required
- Yes
- Licensing burden
- Medium
- Last updated
- 2026-07-13
AML Obligations
- Registration with FURS (Financial Administration) under ZPPML-1 before commencing operations (currently registration, not a full prudential license).
- Implementation of robust internal AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls as per ZPPDFT-2.
- Risk assessment frameworks covering customer, product, and geographical risks.
- Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) measures.
- Record-keeping of transactions and customer data.
- Reporting of suspicious transactions to the Office for Money Laundering Prevention (UPPD).
- Appointment of an AML officer.
- Training for relevant employees on AML/CFT matters.
- Fit and proper assessment for management and beneficial owners.
- If processing fiat payments (e.g., EUR deposits/withdrawals), may require a Payment Institution (PI) or Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Bank of Slovenia under ZPlaS-1 (PSD2 transposition).
- Future (MiCA): Will require a CASP license from a national competent authority (likely ATVP or Bank of Slovenia) with minimum initial capital/professional indemnity insurance, governance arrangements, and legal person establishment in the EU.
Key Restrictions
- Must register with FURS under ZPPML-1 before offering services (current pre-MiCA regime).
- Must be locally incorporated (legal person established in the EU — required both currently and under MiCA).
- If the business model involves holding client fiat funds or initiating payments, a separate PI/EMI license from the Bank of Slovenia is likely needed.
- Under current (pre-MiCA) law, there is no explicit statutory requirement for segregation of client crypto assets, cold storage mandates, or professional indemnity insurance for VASPs — creating structural uncertainty.
- Future (MiCA): Will require a CASP license with prudential requirements (capital, governance, custody standards) once MiCA comes into full effect.
Key Risks
- Regulatory ambiguity in the pre-MiCA period — ZPPDFT-2 focuses on AML/CFT only, with no prudential requirements for asset protection, capital adequacy, or custody standards.
- FURS could reclassify crypto activity as a 'regular economic activity' for tax purposes, triggering income tax and social security obligations.
- Declaration obligations for foreign accounts (including foreign crypto exchange accounts) above EUR 10,000 — risk of non-compliance for cross-border operations.
- If processing fiat payments without the proper PI/EMI license, risk of enforcement by the Bank of Slovenia.
- MiCA transition creates a near-term regulatory shift — firms registered under ZPPML-1 will need to upgrade to a full CASP license, with potentially higher capital and governance requirements.
Evidence
This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).
Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPML-1):
Competent Authority: The Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (FURS) (Finančna uprava Republike Slovenije) is the primary supervisory authority for AML/CTF compliance, including the registration and supervision of VASPs.
Current Regime (ZPPML-1): Registration. Slovenia currently requires VASPs to register with FURS before they can operate. This is a registration for AML/CTF purposes, focusing on preventing illicit financial activities, rather than a full operational license that would typically cover aspects like prudential requirements, consumer protection, or market integrity comprehensively.
Future Regime (MiCA): Licensing. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) will introduce a comprehensive, harmonized licensing framework for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) across all EU member states. MiCA will come into full effect for most crypto-assets by December 30, 2024 (stablecoin rules apply from June 30, 2024). Once MiCA is fully implemented, it will largely supersede the national AML-driven registration requirements for the activities it covers, introducing a full licensing regime with passporting rights across the EU.
Requirement: Registration with FURS under ZPPML-1.
If processing fiat payments for crypto transactions (e.g., enabling users to deposit/withdraw EUR to/from an exchange account):
This could require a Payment Institution (PI) license or Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Bank of Slovenia (Banka Slovenije). This is separate from VASP registration and is generally a more robust licensing process.
Future under MiCA: Will require a CASP license from a competent authority (which Slovenia will designate, likely Bank of Slovenia or ATVP) for operating an exchange platform.
Future under MiCA: Activities like "execution of orders for crypto-assets" or "transfer services for crypto-assets" would require a CASP license.
VASP Registration: Entities providing services of safeguarding private cryptographic keys on behalf of clients, or holding, storing, and transferring virtual currencies, are classified as "virtual asset service providers" (VASPs) under ZPPDFT-2.
Obligation to Register: VASPs must register with the Office for Money Laundering Prevention (UPPD). This is a registration requirement, not a full prudential licensing regime akin to banks or investment firms, but it entails strict AML/CFT compliance obligations.
Requirements for Registration:
Implementation of robust internal AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls.
Risk assessment frameworks (customer, product, geographical risks).
Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) measures.
Record-keeping of transactions and customer data.
Reporting of suspicious transactions to UPPD.
Appointment of an AML officer.
Training for relevant employees.
Fit and proper assessment for management and beneficial owners (though not as extensive as for licensed financial institutions).
Currently (Pre-MiCA): ZPPDFT-2 primarily focuses on AML/CFT compliance, ensuring the identification of asset ownership and preventing illicit finance. It does not explicitly mandate insolvency-remote segregation of client crypto assets from the custodian's own assets in the same way traditional financial regulations (e.g., MiFID II for investment firms, CRD for banks) do.
Currently (Pre-MiCA): There are no specific statutory requirements under ZPPDFT-2 for VASPs (including custodians) to hold professional indemnity insurance or maintain a minimum level of own funds for asset protection, unlike for traditional financial institutions.
Authorization: CASPs offering custody services will require authorization from a national competent authority (e.g., ATVP in Slovenia). This is a much more stringent licensing process than the current AML registration.
Key Requirements (MiCA Articles 59-64, and specific for custody Articles 65-68):
Legal form: CASPs must be legal persons established in the EU.
Governance: Robust governance arrangements, internal control mechanisms, risk management procedures.
Management body: Members must be of good repute and possess sufficient knowledge, skills, and experience.
Initial capital: Requirement for minimum initial capital or professional indemnity insurance (see below).
Verdict Attribution
- Source:
- AI-Generated · Unreviewed
- AI synthesized:
- 2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
- Last updated:
- 2026-07-13
- Confidence:
- medium
This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.
Conditional — an on-shore VASP in Slovenia must register with FURS under ZPPML-1 (pre-MiCA) for AML/CFT compliance, and if handling fiat payments, may need an additional PI/EMI license from the Bank of Slovenia; the upcoming MiCA regime will introduce a full CASP licensing framework with prudential requirements.
Questions this verdict aims to answer
- What license(s) are required to operate locally?
- What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
- What is the application process and timeline?