← Regulations / Slovenia / Operating Models / On-shore VASP

On-shore VASP in Slovenia

Locally-incorporated VASP that operates under full local jurisdiction, holding all required licenses and registrations.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

On-shore VASP is conditionally permitted in Slovenia with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and medium licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
Medium
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Registration with FURS (Financial Administration) under ZPPML-1 before commencing operations (currently registration, not a full prudential license).
  • Implementation of robust internal AML/CFT policies, procedures, and controls as per ZPPDFT-2.
  • Risk assessment frameworks covering customer, product, and geographical risks.
  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) measures.
  • Record-keeping of transactions and customer data.
  • Reporting of suspicious transactions to the Office for Money Laundering Prevention (UPPD).
  • Appointment of an AML officer.
  • Training for relevant employees on AML/CFT matters.
  • Fit and proper assessment for management and beneficial owners.
  • If processing fiat payments (e.g., EUR deposits/withdrawals), may require a Payment Institution (PI) or Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Bank of Slovenia under ZPlaS-1 (PSD2 transposition).
  • Future (MiCA): Will require a CASP license from a national competent authority (likely ATVP or Bank of Slovenia) with minimum initial capital/professional indemnity insurance, governance arrangements, and legal person establishment in the EU.

Key Restrictions

  • Must register with FURS under ZPPML-1 before offering services (current pre-MiCA regime).
  • Must be locally incorporated (legal person established in the EU — required both currently and under MiCA).
  • If the business model involves holding client fiat funds or initiating payments, a separate PI/EMI license from the Bank of Slovenia is likely needed.
  • Under current (pre-MiCA) law, there is no explicit statutory requirement for segregation of client crypto assets, cold storage mandates, or professional indemnity insurance for VASPs — creating structural uncertainty.
  • Future (MiCA): Will require a CASP license with prudential requirements (capital, governance, custody standards) once MiCA comes into full effect.

Key Risks

  • Regulatory ambiguity in the pre-MiCA period — ZPPDFT-2 focuses on AML/CFT only, with no prudential requirements for asset protection, capital adequacy, or custody standards.
  • FURS could reclassify crypto activity as a 'regular economic activity' for tax purposes, triggering income tax and social security obligations.
  • Declaration obligations for foreign accounts (including foreign crypto exchange accounts) above EUR 10,000 — risk of non-compliance for cross-border operations.
  • If processing fiat payments without the proper PI/EMI license, risk of enforcement by the Bank of Slovenia.
  • MiCA transition creates a near-term regulatory shift — firms registered under ZPPML-1 will need to upgrade to a full CASP license, with potentially higher capital and governance requirements.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 60% confidence

Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPML-1):

licensing 20% confidence

Competent Authority: The Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia (FURS) (Finančna uprava Republike Slovenije) is the primary supervisory authority for AML/CTF compliance, including the registration and supervision of VASPs.

licensing 20% confidence

Current Regime (ZPPML-1): Registration. Slovenia currently requires VASPs to register with FURS before they can operate. This is a registration for AML/CTF purposes, focusing on preventing illicit financial activities, rather than a full operational license that would typically cover aspects like prudential requirements, consumer protection, or market integrity comprehensively.

licensing 20% confidence

Future Regime (MiCA): Licensing. The EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2023/1114) will introduce a comprehensive, harmonized licensing framework for crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) across all EU member states. MiCA will come into full effect for most crypto-assets by December 30, 2024 (stablecoin rules apply from June 30, 2024). Once MiCA is fully implemented, it will largely supersede the national AML-driven registration requirements for the activities it covers, introducing a full licensing regime with passporting rights across the EU.

licensing 20% confidence

Requirement: Registration with FURS under ZPPML-1.

licensing 20% confidence

If processing fiat payments for crypto transactions (e.g., enabling users to deposit/withdraw EUR to/from an exchange account):

licensing 20% confidence

This could require a Payment Institution (PI) license or Electronic Money Institution (EMI) license from the Bank of Slovenia (Banka Slovenije). This is separate from VASP registration and is generally a more robust licensing process.

licensing 20% confidence

Future under MiCA: Will require a CASP license from a competent authority (which Slovenia will designate, likely Bank of Slovenia or ATVP) for operating an exchange platform.

licensing 20% confidence

Future under MiCA: Activities like "execution of orders for crypto-assets" or "transfer services for crypto-assets" would require a CASP license.

aml 60% confidence

VASP Registration: Entities providing services of safeguarding private cryptographic keys on behalf of clients, or holding, storing, and transferring virtual currencies, are classified as "virtual asset service providers" (VASPs) under ZPPDFT-2.

aml 60% confidence

Obligation to Register: VASPs must register with the Office for Money Laundering Prevention (UPPD). This is a registration requirement, not a full prudential licensing regime akin to banks or investment firms, but it entails strict AML/CFT compliance obligations.

aml 100% confidence

Fit and proper assessment for management and beneficial owners (though not as extensive as for licensed financial institutions).

aml 60% confidence

Currently (Pre-MiCA): ZPPDFT-2 primarily focuses on AML/CFT compliance, ensuring the identification of asset ownership and preventing illicit finance. It does not explicitly mandate insolvency-remote segregation of client crypto assets from the custodian's own assets in the same way traditional financial regulations (e.g., MiFID II for investment firms, CRD for banks) do.

aml 60% confidence

Currently (Pre-MiCA): There are no specific statutory requirements under ZPPDFT-2 for VASPs (including custodians) to hold professional indemnity insurance or maintain a minimum level of own funds for asset protection, unlike for traditional financial institutions.

aml 60% confidence

Authorization: CASPs offering custody services will require authorization from a national competent authority (e.g., ATVP in Slovenia). This is a much more stringent licensing process than the current AML registration.

aml 60% confidence

Governance: Robust governance arrangements, internal control mechanisms, risk management procedures.

aml 60% confidence

Management body: Members must be of good repute and possess sufficient knowledge, skills, and experience.

aml 60% confidence

Initial capital: Requirement for minimum initial capital or professional indemnity insurance (see below).

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — an on-shore VASP in Slovenia must register with FURS under ZPPML-1 (pre-MiCA) for AML/CFT compliance, and if handling fiat payments, may need an additional PI/EMI license from the Bank of Slovenia; the upcoming MiCA regime will introduce a full CASP licensing framework with prudential requirements.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What license(s) are required to operate locally?
  • What capital, governance, and reporting obligations apply?
  • What is the application process and timeline?