← Regulations / San Marino / Operating Models / Stablecoin issuer

Stablecoin issuer / redeemer in San Marino

Issues a fiat-pegged stablecoin to the public, operates redemption, and holds reserves backing the float.

Conditional AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Stablecoin issuer is conditionally permitted in San Marino with a local entity, subject to AML obligations and high licensing burden.

Verdict Details

Permitted
conditional
Local entity required
Yes
Licensing burden
High
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • Must obtain ODLT authorization (Authorized Operator for DLT) from BCRSM as a prerequisite (sm.stablecoin.authorized-operator-for-distributed-ledger)
  • Must obtain an e-money institution license from BCRSM if the stablecoin is classified as an e-money token (fiat-denominated, redeemable at par) (sm.stablecoin.e-money-institution-license-for-stablecoins)
  • Alternatively, if classified as a security token, must obtain an investment firm/financial institution license from BCRSM (sm.stablecoin.investment-firmfinancial-institution-license-for)
  • Full AML/CFT compliance under Decree No. 120/2019 including CDD/KYC, beneficial ownership identification (>25% threshold), PEP screening, and EDD for high-risk relationships (sm.aml.legal-personsarrangements-obtain-and-verify, sm.aml.beneficial-ownership-bo, sm.aml.enhanced-due-diligence-edd-apply)
  • Must appoint an AML Officer and a Board-level AML Compliance Officer (sm.licensing.appointing-an-aml-officer-and)
  • Must establish STR mechanism and report suspicious transactions to the Financial Intelligence Agency (AIF) (sm.licensing.establishing-a-suspicious-transaction-reporting)
  • Must implement risk-based approach (RBA) to AML/CFT with ongoing transaction monitoring (sm.aml.risk-based-approach-rba-vasps-must, sm.aml.conduct-ongoing-monitoring-of-the)
  • Compliance with BCRSM Circular No. 1/2020 (DLT operators AML/CFT provisions) (sm.stablecoin.example-circolare-n-12020-disposizioni)

Key Restrictions

  • Must be incorporated in San Marino as an S.p.A. or S.r.l. with registered office and effective management in San Marino (sm.licensing.must-be-a-joint-stock-company, sm.licensing.must-have-its-registered-office)
  • Minimum share capital of €300,000 for ODLTs providing services to the public and holding client funds/virtual assets; BCRSM may require higher capital based on risk profile (sm.licensing.300000-for-odlts-providing-services, sm.licensing.the-bcra-may-require-a)
  • Algorithmic stablecoins (lacking direct fiat/asset backing) likely cannot qualify as e-money tokens and face significant classification challenges; may be treated as high-risk unregulated digital assets (sm.stablecoin.lack-of-direct-fiatasset-backing, sm.stablecoin.classification-challenges-their-classification-would)
  • Reserve assets for e-money stablecoins must be fully backed, segregated from operational funds, and held in secure accounts (e.g., credit institutions) (sm.stablecoin.full-backing-the-issuer-must, sm.stablecoin.segregation-these-assets-must-be, sm.stablecoin.custody-rules-on-the-safe)
  • Foreign-issued stablecoins likely require an authorized San Marino-based entity to issue/redeem locally; no indication that foreign issuers can operate without local licensing

Key Risks

  • Classification uncertainty: stablecoins could be treated as e-money tokens, security tokens, or unregulated digital assets depending on their exact structure, creating legal risk (sm.stablecoin.if-a-stablecoin-is-designed, sm.stablecoin.if-a-stablecoin-represents-a)
  • Algorithmic stablecoins face a particularly high risk of being denied licensing or deemed unregulated, with no clear legal pathway (sm.stablecoin.lack-of-direct-fiatasset-backing)
  • Rigorous and potentially lengthy licensing process involving capital, governance, fit-and-proper, and business plan assessments by BCRSM (sm.stablecoin.the-licensing-process-is-rigorous)
  • All business income from stablecoin operations subject to 17% corporate income tax (IGR) (sm.tax.current-igr-rate-the-standard)
  • Small regulatory ecosystem — limited precedent, likely slow response times, and concentrated supervisory capacity at BCRSM

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

stablecoin 60% confidence

Legge Delegata n. 129 del 2019 – Legge per le tecnologie a registro distribuito (Delegated Law No. 129 of 2019 – Law for Distributed Ledger Technologies - DLT Law): This is the foundational law that provides the legal framework for DLT-based activities, defines types of tokens, and delegates regulatory power to the BCRSM for DLTs applied to financial instruments.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Decreto della Banca Centrale n. 2 del 2020 – Regolamento attuativo della Legge Delegata n. 129 del 2019 in materia di emissione di strumenti finanziari tramite DLT (BCRSM Decree No. 2 of 2020 – Implementing Regulation of Delegated Law No. 129 of 2019 concerning the issuance of financial instruments via DLT): This decree, issued by the Central Bank, specifically details the rules for issuing financial instruments, including security tokens and potentially certain types of stablecoins, on DLTs.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Authorized Operator for Distributed Ledger Technologies (ODLT): Law 129/2019 introduced the concept of an "Authorized Operator for Distributed Ledger Technologies" (ODLT). All entities wishing to operate DLT-based activities in San Marino that involve regulated financial instruments or services must obtain authorization from the BCRSM.

stablecoin 60% confidence

If a stablecoin is designed to maintain a stable value, is denominated in fiat currency (e.g., EUR, USD), and is redeemable at par by the issuer, it would likely be classified as e-money if issued by an authorized entity or used as a payment instrument. Issuers of such tokens would be subject to e-money regulations, requiring a specific license from the BCRSM. The BCRSM Decree No. 2/2020, referring to financial instruments, clarifies that where DLTs are used for activities falling under existing financial sector laws (e.g., e-money, payment services), those specific laws apply.

stablecoin 60% confidence

If a stablecoin represents a share in a basket of assets, a debt instrument, or ownership of specific underlying assets (e.g., real estate, commodities), it would likely be classified as a security token under Law 129/2019. The issuance of security tokens is regulated by BCRSM Decree No. 2/2020, which sets requirements for public offerings, whitepapers, and investor protection.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Lack of Direct Fiat/Asset Backing: Algorithmic stablecoins, which rely on software algorithms and market incentives rather than direct fiat or collateral backing to maintain their peg, would not likely qualify as e-money tokens under San Marino's framework due to the absence of the required full and segregated fiat reserves.

stablecoin 60% confidence

Example: Circolare n. 1/2020 – Disposizioni in materia di prevenzione e contrasto del riciclaggio e del finanziamento del terrorismo per gli operatori DLT (Circular No. 1/2020 – Provisions concerning the prevention and combating of money laundering and terrorist financing for DLT operators).

licensing 60% confidence

Law No. 171 of December 17, 2019, "Regulations for Distributed Ledger Technologies and Blockchain for Business" (Legge 171/2019): This law defines DLT, virtual assets, and establishes the framework for Operators in Distributed Ledger Technologies (ODLTs).

licensing 60% confidence

BCRA Circular No. 64 of 15 September 2020, "Disciplining the activities of Operators in Distributed Ledger Technologies": This circular provides detailed implementation rules for Law 171/2019, specifying the requirements for obtaining authorization (registration) as an ODLT.

licensing 60% confidence

Must be a joint-stock company (Società per Azioni - S.p.A.) or a limited liability company (Società a responsabilità limitata - S.r.l.) established in San Marino.

licensing 60% confidence

Must have its registered office and effective management in San Marino.

licensing 60% confidence

€300,000 for ODLTs providing services directly to the public (including VASPs like exchanges and custody providers) and holding client funds or virtual assets.

licensing 60% confidence

The BCRA may require a higher capital amount based on the complexity, scale, and risk profile of the proposed activities.

licensing 60% confidence

Appointing an AML Officer and a Board-level AML Compliance Officer.

licensing 60% confidence

Establishing a Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR) mechanism and reporting to the Financial Intelligence Agency (AIF).

aml 60% confidence

Legal Persons/Arrangements: Obtain and verify legal name, legal form, address, proof of existence, powers that regulate and bind the legal person/arrangement, and names of individuals authorized to act on its behalf.

aml 60% confidence

Beneficial Ownership (BO):

aml 60% confidence

Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD): Apply EDD in higher-risk situations, including but not limited to:

aml 60% confidence

Risk-Based Approach (RBA): VASPs must implement a risk-based approach to AML/CFT, meaning they should:

aml 60% confidence

Conduct ongoing monitoring of the business relationship and transactions undertaken throughout the course of that relationship.

tax 60% confidence

Current IGR Rate: The standard corporate income tax (IGR) rate in San Marino is 17%. Special reduced rates or incentives may apply to new businesses or specific types of activities under certain conditions.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
medium

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Conditional — a stablecoin issuer may operate in San Marino only by establishing a locally incorporated S.p.A. or S.r.l., obtaining both ODLT authorization and a specific financial license (e-money institution or investment firm) from BCRSM, meeting minimum capital of €300,000+, complying with full AML/CFT obligations, and adhering to strict reserve segregation and custody rules; algorithmic stablecoins without full fiat/asset backing face significant classification and licensing obstacles.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • What e-money or banking license is required to issue?
  • What reserve composition, segregation, and audit rules apply?
  • What redemption rights must be granted to holders?
  • Are foreign-issued stablecoins permitted for use locally?