← Regulations / Syria / Operating Models / Self-custodial wallet

Self-custodial wallet / non-custodial software in Syria

Publisher of software where users hold their own private keys. The publisher never holds, controls, or has access to user funds.

Not permitted AI-Generated · Unreviewed

Self-custodial wallet is not permitted in Syria.

Verdict Details

Permitted
no
Local entity required
No
Licensing burden
None
Last updated
2026-07-13

AML Obligations

  • No AML/KYC obligations attach — the activity (publishing software related to cryptocurrencies) itself is prohibited under Syrian law and thus cannot be lawfully carried out.
  • Engaging in such activities carries significant criminal penalties under Law No. 36 of 2022 (imprisonment and fines).
  • Syria's general AML framework (Law No. 33 of 2014, Legislative Decree No. 33 of 2005) applies to traditional finance, but is irrelevant here because the crypto activity is prohibited outright.

Key Restrictions

  • Publishing software that enables cryptocurrency self-custody could be construed as 'promoting' or 'using' virtual currencies, which is prohibited under Central Bank of Syria Circular No. 6/M.A. (2021).
  • Law No. 36 of 2022 criminalizes trading, use as payment, and promotion of cryptocurrencies — software distribution may fall under 'promotion'.
  • No licensing or registration regime exists; there is no legal pathway to operate.
  • Syria is subject to international sanctions, making any cross-border financial or software activity involving novel assets extremely high-risk.

Key Risks

  • Legal prosecution under Law No. 36 of 2022, with penalties including imprisonment and fines.
  • Seizure/blocking of funds and accounts by Syrian authorities.
  • Classification of software publishing as 'promotion' of prohibited virtual currencies — enforcement precedent suggests blanket prohibition applies to all cryptocurrency-related activities.
  • International sanctions exposure — any involvement with Syria carries secondary sanctions risk for foreign entities.
  • Reputational risk from operating in a jurisdiction with an outright ban and opaque enforcement environment.

Evidence

This verdict synthesizes the following facts. Each fact links to its primary source(s).

licensing 40% confidence

None are available or required. Engaging in these activities with cryptocurrencies is generally prohibited under current Syrian financial regulations.

licensing 40% confidence

Any entity attempting to operate such services would be doing so outside the legal framework and would face severe legal repercussions.

licensing 40% confidence

Neither a registration nor a licensing regime exists for virtual assets. The regime is one of prohibition.

licensing 40% confidence

Irrelevant. Since the activities are prohibited, there are no prescribed requirements for capital, AML/KYC policies (specific to crypto, general financial AML/KYC still applies to traditional finance), or local presence for crypto businesses.

licensing 40% confidence

Central Bank of Syria Circular No. 6/M.A. (2021):

licensing 40% confidence

Specific Prohibition: It prohibits individuals and entities from creating, promoting, trading, or using any form of virtual currencies within Syria.

licensing 40% confidence

Legal prosecution: Imprisonment and fines.

aml 40% confidence

Prohibition: The Central Bank of Syria (CBS) has repeatedly issued warnings and directives prohibiting the use and trading of cryptocurrencies.

aml 40% confidence

Criminalization: Law No. 36 of 2022 (issued in November 2022) explicitly criminalizes various activities related to cryptocurrencies, including their use as a payment method, trading, and promotion. Penalties are severe, including imprisonment and hefty fines.

aml 40% confidence

There are no legal AML/KYC requirements because the service itself is prohibited.

aml 40% confidence

Engaging in such activities carries significant criminal penalties under Law No. 36 of 2022.

aml 40% confidence

Furthermore, Syria is subject to international sanctions, making any financial activity, especially involving novel assets like crypto, extremely high-risk from an international compliance perspective.

custody 20% confidence

Explanation: Since cryptocurrencies are prohibited, there are no licensing frameworks for any entities (including financial institutions) to provide custodial services for digital assets. Engaging in such activities would likely be considered a violation of the existing ban.

custody 20% confidence

Status: There is no publicly available information or indication of pending legislation in Syria specifically addressing the regulation or custody of digital assets. Given the current outright ban and the country's economic and political circumstances, the focus remains on enforcing the prohibition rather than developing regulatory frameworks for legal crypto activities.

enforcement 60% confidence

Outcome: All cryptocurrency activities (trading, mining, possession, promotion) are officially illegal within Syria. This directive empowers authorities to crack down on anyone found dealing with digital assets. Reports from within Syria, though anecdotal and difficult to verify with official sources, suggest individuals have faced arrest and asset seizure for cryptocurrency-related activities following this ban.

Verdict Attribution

Source:
AI-Generated · Unreviewed
AI synthesized:
2026-07-13 (deepseek-chat)
Last updated:
2026-07-13
Confidence:
high

This verdict was produced by an AI model from the underlying facts. Confirm with counsel before relying on it for material decisions.

Not permitted — Syria has an outright prohibition on cryptocurrency dealings under Central Bank of Syria Circular No. 6/M.A. (2021) and Law No. 36 of 2022, which criminalizes trading, use, and promotion of virtual currencies; self-custodial wallet software publishing is not exempt and carries risk of legal prosecution, with no licensing or registration pathway available.

Questions this verdict aims to answer

  • Does software publishing trigger VASP / MSB classification?
  • Do AML obligations attach when no custody exists?
  • What disclosure or consumer-protection rules apply?